12.07.2015 Views

651.-london-borough-of-brent-and-its-boundaries-with-barnet,-camden,-ealing,-hammersmith-and-fulham,-harrow,-knc-and-westminster

651.-london-borough-of-brent-and-its-boundaries-with-barnet,-camden,-ealing,-hammersmith-and-fulham,-harrow,-knc-and-westminster

651.-london-borough-of-brent-and-its-boundaries-with-barnet,-camden,-ealing,-hammersmith-and-fulham,-harrow,-knc-and-westminster

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ear" curtilages <strong>of</strong> properties in Moyne Place <strong>and</strong> Abbeyf ieldsClose, to rejoin the existing boundary in Twyford Abbey Road.134. Having considered the response to our draft proposal, weremained doubtful that the current three-way split <strong>of</strong> Park Royalwas in the long-term best interests <strong>of</strong> the industrial estate; weconsidered that, in purely planning terms, there was a case foruniting the estate <strong>with</strong>in one authority. Nevertheless, it wasclear to us that Brent has close, <strong>and</strong> mutually beneficial,contact <strong>with</strong> business <strong>and</strong> industrial concerns in Park Royal.These contacts extend into the education <strong>and</strong> training spheres,<strong>and</strong> appear to be <strong>of</strong> particular value to an area such as southBrent; which has suffered from high unemployment. Moreover, Brentargued persuasively that the current multi-agency <strong>and</strong> multi<strong>borough</strong>approach to planning matters functions effectively, <strong>and</strong>that to disrupt existing arrangements would set backredevelopment. • .135. We accepted that the Central Middlesex Hospital, in spite<strong>of</strong> <strong>its</strong> N.H.S. Trust status, had close links <strong>with</strong> the ParksideHealth Authority <strong>and</strong> Brent's Social Services Department, <strong>and</strong> that<strong>its</strong> transfer to Ealing might have a detrimental effect on healthcare provision in Brent.136. The information received in response to our draft proposalsletter suggested, on balance, that major change in the Park Royalarea would be inappropriate at this time. We have thereforedecided not to confirm our draft proposal 'in full, but toconsider instead the options for more limited changes which wouldunite communities <strong>and</strong> rectify defacements in the existingboundary.137. We took the view that West Twyford should be united inEaling, on the grounds that this area has close community ties<strong>with</strong> Ealing, <strong>and</strong> has better access from that Borough.Accordingly, we have decided to adopt as our final proposal asuggestion from a member <strong>of</strong> the public, to transfer ElvedonPlace, Elvedon Road, Moyne Place <strong>and</strong> Abbey fields Close from Brentto Ealing, by a realignment along the River Brent, the centre <strong>of</strong>40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!