12.07.2015 Views

Full-text - Norsk entomologisk forening

Full-text - Norsk entomologisk forening

Full-text - Norsk entomologisk forening

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ven. Yet some generalization concerning the dominantspecies can be made, based on Fig. 2 andadditional notes made during the samplings: InMay to first part of July species of Sphaerophoriadominated in number, Sphaerophoria scripta(L.) and Sphaerophoria taeniata (Meigen) beingabout equally numerous. In last part ofJuly alsoEristalis arbustorum (LJ and Syritta pipiens (L.)became very common. During the first part ofAugust, Syrphus ribesii (L.) increased significantlyin number, and dominated among thesyrphids during the next month. In the last halfof August, Ephisyrphus balteatus (DeGeer) becamesuccessively more common and wasamong the dominating species throughout restof the season together with S. ribesii, Eristalisspecies and Sphaerophoria species.Because of the sampling dates, the two yearscan be compared from August on. The picturewas quite similar for the dominating species.Some of the less common species were found inone of the years only.By the present sampling methods, speciesrichness was greatest in August. During October,the adult syrphids disappeared from the habitat.In July/August 1970, syrphid eggs and younglarvae (I st and 2nd instars) were rathercommonly observed among dense bean aphidcolonies on C. arvense. The majority (70 %) ofthose larvae collected for breeding to adult, diedas larvae or parasitized pupae. From the fewadults that emerged, it appeared that larvae collectedon 20 July belonged to Metasyrphus coro­/ae (Fabricius) and larvae collected on 10 Augustto S. ribesii.DISCUSSIONThe present results describe the phenology ofsyrphids in a particular, small meadow habitat.Absent species may well occur in the surroundinghabitats, just as present species may haveoccurred in the surroundings before they wererecorded in the studied habitat.Several investigations on the syrphid fauna invarious habitats also include information on seasonalvariation in the occurrence of differentspecies (Schneider 1958, Banks 1959, Bombosch1963, Belakova 1966, Nielsen 1971, 1972, Pollard1971, Wnuk 1972, Dusek & Laska 1974,Bankowska et al. 1975). The syrphid fauna in acertain habitat at a particular time is a result ofboth the present flora, which offers food and/ oroviposition sites, and the developmental biologyof each syrphid species, particularly hibernation86stage and generation number. Dusek & Laska(1974) were able to correlate the sequential springemergence of some dominant syrphid specieswith the thermal requirements of the hibernatingstages.In the present study, the number of floweringplant species culminated in June, whereas speciesrichness of syrphids in this particular habitatwas highest in August. Apparently, life cycleof the flies determine their phenology. However,the rich fauna in August may also be explainedby the late slimmer migration of species into thehabitat from the surrounding vegetation and bypoor representation of spring species due tosmall first generation populations.Because the developmental biology shows geographicalvariations, the present results are bestcomparable with those of Nielsen (1971, 1972)from Jreren, Norway. However, his materialwas sampled from different biotopes, whichwere described by nourishing flowers for thesyrphids. Most abundant species in Fig. 2 were \S. ribesii, S. scripta, S. taeniata, E, arbustorum,Syrphus vitripennis Meigen, E. ba/teatus and S.pipiens. The majority of the listed species haveaphidophagous larvae, exceptions are S. pipiens,Neoascia podagrica (Fabricius), He/iophilus pendu/usL. and the species of Eristalis, Cheilosiaand Vo/ucella. The syrphid species listed in Fig.2, except S. taeniata, Vo/ucella inanis (L.) andCheilosia ve/utina Loew are all recorded fromNielsen's studies on Jreren, where most of thesespecies are characterized as eurytope and common.The occurrences in Fig. 2 fit with the flightperiods from Jreren, although last observationsof adult S. ribesii, Pha/acrodira vittiger (ZetterstedO,Heliophilus pendu/us L. and P/atychiruspeltatus (Meigen) were slightly later than recordedfrom Jreren, and first observations of adultS. ribesii and S. scripta slightly earlier.In the investigation from Jreren, some speciesoccurred most commonly in spring and earlysummer, as Syrphus torvus Osten-Sacken, Dasysyrphus/unu/atus (Meigen), P. vittiger, Platychirusa/bimanus (Fabricius), P/atychirus clypeatus(Meigen) and P. pe/tatus. Others were most numerousin late summer and autumn, as S. ribesii,M. corollae, S. scripta, E. balteatus, Eristalistenax (L.) and Eristalis pertinax (ScopoJi). Onlythe most abundant species in the present studycan be compared with such trends, which fitwell for S. ribesii and E. balteatus. On the otherhand, S. scripta appeared about equally numerousin May as in the autumn.Generally, syrphids hibernating as adults arelikely to be seen early and/or late in the season.II

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!