12.07.2015 Views

Hunting Economic Impact - Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Hunting Economic Impact - Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

Hunting Economic Impact - Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Mark LaBarbera, Outdoor Heritage Education CenterMark LaBarbera, Outdoor Heritage Education CenterHunters—An <strong>Economic</strong> PowerAnd hunters are good for the economy.They not only purchase hunting gear,trucks <strong>and</strong> boats; they also fill their gastanks <strong>and</strong> coolers. They stay at motels <strong>and</strong>resorts. They buy hunting clothes <strong>and</strong>those go<strong>of</strong>y hunting hats with sayings thatare sometimes funny <strong>and</strong> always a conversationpiece. On average, each hunterspends $1,896 per year on hunting, whichis 5.5% <strong>of</strong> the typical wage earner’s annualincome. These expenditures then “ripple”through the economy generating threetimes more impact for the U.S. economy.For many communities, hunting dollarskeep them afloat.Hunters also pay a truckload <strong>of</strong> specialexcise taxes. The <strong>Wildlife</strong> RestorationFund under the Pittman-Robertson legislationcollects these excise taxes on certainhunting equipment <strong>and</strong> apportionsthem to state natural resource agencies forconservation <strong>and</strong> education, whichincludes habitat restoration, shooting■ A hunter’s best friend is his dog <strong>and</strong> they show it—hunters spend $605 million onhunting dogs, well more than the $513 million skiers spend on ski equipment.■ Each year hunters spend more money on food for hunting trips than Americansspend on Domino’s pizza. Business generated by hunters is <strong>of</strong>ten the lifeblood<strong>of</strong> rural communities.■ Over a half million jobs in America are supported by hunters. That’s more jobsthan the combined employees <strong>of</strong> all the top U.S. based airlines includingAmerican, United, Delta, Northwest, Continental, US Airways, Southwest, AlaskaAir <strong>and</strong> American West.■ The $2.4 billion in annual federal income-tax money generated by hunters’spending could cover the annual paychecks <strong>of</strong> 100,000 troops. That’s 8 divisions,143 battalions, 3,300 platoons <strong>and</strong> some major money.Source: Congressional Sportsmen’s Foundationranges, wildlife research <strong>and</strong> more. Forfiscal year 2002, this program deliveredmore than $481 million to the states <strong>and</strong>territories <strong>of</strong> the United States, with morethan $292 million <strong>of</strong> it for sport fishrestoration <strong>and</strong> more than $188 million<strong>of</strong> it for wildlife restoration. Together,hunters <strong>and</strong> anglers may very well be themost important source <strong>of</strong> conservationfunding in the United States.<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> Continues to GrowIn good times <strong>and</strong> bad, hunters set theirsights on spending more time in the fields<strong>and</strong> forests. Even when economic recession<strong>and</strong> uncertainty over homel<strong>and</strong> securityhave the nation <strong>and</strong> the economyrecoiling, hunters continue to aim theirleisure time <strong>and</strong> money toward shootingsports activities. For example, since 1991,when the nation was mired in a similarrecession <strong>and</strong> war, retail sales have grownnearly 17% (adjusted for inflation).Many just do not realize the positiveimpacts generated by hunters. A recentreport released by the CongressionalSportsmen’s Foundation highlights thatAmericans spend more on hunting dogsthan they do for ski equipment. If that’snot enough, the $2.4 billion in federalincome tax revenue generated by hunterscould cover the annual paychecks for100,000 U.S. Army troops. At the statelevel, the hunter’s economic effects canbe especially important. In Georgia, forexample, hunting expenditures wereone-third greater than the value <strong>of</strong> thisstate’s famous peanut harvest, providing atremendous boost to rural areas. Those arethe kinds <strong>of</strong> numbers that should turn thehead <strong>of</strong> any state legislator or politician.And that’s just the point.3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!