LOGISTICSBuilding a NAFTA houseU.S. eases Mexican concrete trade, but tensionsremain on Canadian lumber imports.Housing construction in the UnitedStates remains a robust industry,but severe shortages in buildingmaterials, especially in the hurricaneravagedGulf Coast states, threatens themomentum.To ease supply shortfalls, U.S. builderswant more access to construction materialsmanufactured in Mexico and Canada.They’re demanding Washington lawmakersand Bush administration officials take actionto end trade squabbles over Mexican cementand Canadian softwood lumber.The Bush administration responded onMarch 6 by entering into an agreement withMexico to increase imports of gray portlandcement, effectively ending a 16-year tradedispute between the two countries.“The agreement contains provisions thatwill help increase access to the Mexicanmarket for U.S. cement producers, and it alsoensures that our Gulf Coast communitieswill have the resources necessary to rebuild,”said U.S. Commerce Secretary Carlos M.Gutierrez in a statement.The agreement settles all litigation regardingoutstanding claims for duties beforeU.S. and international courts, and dividesbetween the parties the deposits of estimatedantidumping duties.The agreement also sets a limit of 3 millionmetric tons on imports of Mexican cementto enter the United States at an antidumpingduty rate of $3 per metric ton, comparedto a previous $26 per ton duty. If a disasteroccurs, it allows the president to seek anadditional 200,000 metric tons at the sameduty rate. If the terms of the agreement areadhered to over the next three years, theagreement will end and the antidumpingorder revoked.In 1989, the Southern Tier Cement Committeefiled a petition with the CommerceDepartment, which resulted in an antidumpingduty investigation. The departmentfound that Mexican producers sold cementat less than fair value in the U.S. market. OnAug. 30, 1990, an antidumping duty orderon imports of gray portland cement fromMexico took effect.In 2004, members of Congress, tradegroups and cement consumers called on40 AMERICAN SHIPPER: APRIL 2006BY CHRIS GILLISthe Commerce Department to reduce oreliminate the antidumping duties so thatcement could be imported from Mexico ata more reasonable cost. These efforts wererenewed after Hurricanes Katrina and Ritastruck the Gulf Coast late last year.General cement shortages also continueto hinder the country’s builders at large.“The mild, dry weather this January meantthat more cement was used than usual,making shortages even more likely than lastyear, when 32 states reported shortages byAugust,” said Stephen E. Sandherr, chiefexecutive office of the Associated GeneralContractors of America, in a statement.“Increased ready access to more Mexicancement in some of those states will helpcontractors to keep working instead of havingto lay off employees.”Even with the increased flow of Mexicancement, U.S. builders may still come upshort. According to a recent market analysisby the Portland Cement Association, it’sexpected that builders will increase theirconsumption of cement by at least 10 milliontons over 2005 levels.“The potential increase in Mexicanimports of one million metric tons willimprove supply conditions, but itself willnot be enough to result in an eliminationof concerns regarding future tight marketconditions,” the association said.“The news regarding the Canadiansoftwood lumber debacle is likewalking up an endless sand dune.You take three steps up while slidingback two — with the top neverquite in sight.”Michael Jonespresident,Jones & JonesThe association noted that U.S. cementmakers plan to invest almost $3 billion intheir operations through 2009, which shouldincrease kiln capacity by 14.66 millionmetric tons, a 15.5 percent increase overthe existing capacity.Despite improved prospects for cementsupplies, the trade spate between the UnitedStates and Canada over softwood lumberimports continues to cause headaches forU.S. builders.“The news regarding the Canadian softwoodlumber debacle is like walking up anendless sand dune,” said Michael Jones,president of Jones & Jones, a customs brokerthat specializes in handling Canadian lumberimport clearances. “You take three steps upwhile sliding back two — with the top neverquite in sight.”The Bush administration hopes that talkswith Canada’s newly elected governmentwill help resolve the decades-old tradedispute over Canadian softwood lumber.Deputy U.S. Trade Representative SusanSchwab informed members of the SenateCommerce Committee’s Trade, Tourismand Economic Development Subcommitteein testimony Feb. 14 that the administrationhas approached David Emerson,Canada’s new trade minister, about startingnegotiations as soon as possible to settlethe dispute.“The administration remains committedto a negotiated solution that will end thisdispute, and we look forward to workingwith our Canadian counterparts in order todo so,” she said.The current dispute was sparked after the1996 Softwood Lumber Agreement expiredin 2001, and the U.S. government respondedby imposing antidumping and countervailingduties on softwood lumber importsfrom Canada. Subsequently, the Canadiangovernment and lumber industry have filed
about two-dozen cases challenging the dutiesunder the North <strong>American</strong> Free TradeAgreement, World Trade Organization, andU.S. Court of International Trade.“Throughout the dispute, we repeatedlyhave stressed to our Canadian counterpartsthat, given the long history of this disagreement,there is little reason to believe thatthe current round of cases will resolve thematter once and for all, regardless of how theprocess plays out,” Schwab said. “Withouta negotiated solution, chances are high thatthe dispute will continue.”U.S. lumber industry representativeson both sides of the debate voiced desireto resolve the Canadian softwood lumberdispute through successful negotiationsbetween the two countries.“It is a tragedy that this long festeringtrade dispute has not been resolved,” testifiedSteve Swanson, chairman of Oregon-basedsawmill operator The Swanson Group anda representative of the Coalition for FairLumber Imports, before the Senate subcommittee.“This issue would disappear the daythat Canada made reasonable, transparentand enforceable commitments to end theirunfair trade practices and allow open andcompetitive markets for timber and logs.Canada simply refuses to do so because itis addicted to subsidies and has been unable“Given the long historyof this disagreement, thereis little reason to believethat the current roundof cases will resolvethe matter once andfor all, regardless of howthe process plays out.”Susan SchwabDeputy U.S. TradeRepresentativeto break the habit.”The coalition noted that Douglas firlumber costs $439 per thousand board feetin the United States compared to $113 perthousand board feet in Canada. “Thereis only one explanation — because theCanadian provincial government is settingprices at an artificially low level to subsidizelumber production and employment,”Swanson said.Last year, however, a NAFTA settlementpanel directed the U.S. International TradeLOGISTICSCommission to reverse a finding that unfairimports of Canadian lumber threatenU.S. industry. The coalition responded byquestioning the constitutionality of theNAFTA settlement system, also known asChapter 19, by filing a complaint with theU.S. Court of Appeals for the District ofColumbia Circuit on Sept. 13.Builder groups called the court filing abig mistake which, if allowed to proceed,could further erode U.S. trade relations withCanada at a time when lumber prices arealready inching higher.The National Association of HomeBuilders said U.S. import duties on Canadiansoftwood lumber already add about$1,000 to the cost of a home built in theUnited States.“This duty acts as a tax on <strong>American</strong>home buyers and home owners seeking tomake improvements to their homes, hurtshousing affordability, and prevents manyfamilies from qualifying for a mortgage,”Barry Rutenberg, president of Gainesville,Fla.-based Rutenberg Homes, told Senatelawmakers on Feb. 14.“The simple and critical fact is that theU.S. home building industry cannot meetthe need for new homes and improvementsto existing homes without lumber importsfrom Canada,” Rutenberg said. ■United States Flag Breakbulk Project Service toEastern Mediterranean, Red Sea, East African,Middle Eastern, Pakistan and Indian destinationsLASH CARGOROLL ON/ROLL OFF CARGONew York 212-747-8550 Fax: 212-747-8588 New Orleans 504-586-0500 Fax: 504-525-7792Complete LASH scheduling information on-line www.waterman-steamship.comToll Free: 1-888-972-5274 Email: waterman@intship.comPRINCIPAL SUBSIDIARIES OF INTERNATIONAL SHIPHOLDING CORPORATIONAMERICAN SHIPPER: APRIL 2006 41