128 Mihail Megan, Codruța StoicaExample 2. Let us consider a skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) <strong>and</strong> aparameter λ ∈ R. We define the mappingΦ λ : ∆ × X → B(V ), Φ λ (t, t 0 , x) = e λ(t−t 0) Φ(t, t 0 , x).One can remark that C λ = (Φ λ , ϕ) also satisfies the conditions of Definition3, being called λ-shifted skew-evolution semiflow on Y .Let us consider on the Banach space V the Cauchy problem{ ˙v(t) = Av(t), t > 0v(0) = v 0where A is an operator which generates a C 0 -semigroup S = {S(t)} t≥0 .Then Φ(t, s, x)v = S(t − s)v, where t ≥ s ≥ 0, (x, v) ∈ Y , defines anevolution cocycle. Moreover, the mapping defined by Φ λ : ∆ × X → B(V ),Φ λ (t, s, x)v = S λ (t−s)v, where S λ = {S λ (t)} t≥0 is generated by the operatorA − λI, is also an evolution cocycle.Example 3. Let f : R + → R ∗ + be a decreasing function with the propertythat there exists lim f(t) = a > 0. We denote by C = C(R + , R + ) the sett→∞of all continuous functions x : R + → R + , endowed with the topology ofuniform convergence on compact subsets of R + , metrizable by means of thedistanced(x, y) =∞∑n=11 d n (x, y)2 n 1 + d n (x, y) , where d n(x, y) = sup |x(t) − y(t)|.t∈[0,n]If x ∈ C, then, for all t ∈ R + , we denote x t (s) = x(t + s), x t ∈ C. LetX be the closure in C of the set {f t , t ∈ R + }. It follows that (X, d) is ametric space. The mapping ϕ : ∆ × X → X, ϕ(t, s, x) = x t−s is an evolutionsemiflow on X.We consider V = R 2 , with the norm ‖v‖ = |v 1 | + |v 2 |, v = (v 1 , v 2 ) ∈ V .If u : R + → R ∗ +, then the mapping Φ u : ∆ × X → B(V ) defined byΦ u (t, s, x)v =( u(s)u(t) e− R ts x(τ−s)dτ v 1 , u(t)u(s) e R ts x(τ−s)dτ v 2),is an evolution cocycle over ϕ <strong>and</strong> C = (Φ u , ϕ) is a skew-evolution semiflow.
Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spaces 129Example 4. Let X be a metric space, ϕ an evolution semiflow on X <strong>and</strong>A : X → B(V ) a continuous mapping, where V is a Banach space. If Φ(t, s, x)is the solution of the Cauchy problem{ v ′ (t) = A(ϕ(t, s, x))v(t), t > sv(s) = x,then C = (Φ, ϕ) is a linear skew-evolution semiflow.Other examples of skew-evolution semiflows are given in [15].3 Exponential dichotomyIn this section we define three concepts of exponential dichotomy for skewevolutionsemiflows. We will establish connections between these notions <strong>and</strong>we will emphasize that they are not equivalent.Let C : ∆ × Y → Y , C(t, s, x, v) = (Φ(t, s, x)v, ϕ(t, s, x)) be a skewevolutionsemiflow on Y .We recall that a mapping P : X → B(V ) with the propertyP (x) 2 = P (x), ∀x ∈ Xis called projections family on V .The mapping Q : X → B(V ) defined by Q(x) = I − P (x) is a projectionsfamily, which is called the complementary of P .Definition 4. A projections family P : X → B(V ) is said to be compatiblewith the skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) iff:for all (t, s, x) ∈ ∆ × X.Φ(t, s, x)P (x) = P (ϕ(t, s, x))Φ(t, s, x),In what follows, if P is a given projections family, we will denoteΦ P (t, s, x) = Φ(t, s, x)P (x),for every (t, s, x) ∈ ∆ × X.We remark that(i) Φ P (t, t, x) = P (x), for all (t, x) ∈ R + × X;(ii) Φ P (t, s, ϕ(s, t 0 , x))Φ P (s, t 0 , x) = Φ P (t, t 0 , x), for all (t, s, t 0 , x) ∈ T × X.
- Page 1: ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTSANNAL
- Page 4 and 5: Annals of the Academyof Romanian Sc
- Page 7 and 8: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 9: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 13 and 14: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 15 and 16: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 17 and 18: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 19 and 20: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 21 and 22: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 23 and 24: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 25 and 26: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 27 and 28: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 29 and 30: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 32 and 33: 150 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 34 and 35: 152 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanha
- Page 36 and 37: 154 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanLe
- Page 38 and 39: 156 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanBe
- Page 40 and 41: 158 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanwh
- Page 42 and 43: 160 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan1
- Page 44 and 45: 162 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan(i
- Page 46 and 47: 164 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 48 and 49: 166 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanth
- Page 50 and 51: 168 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan)w
- Page 52 and 53: 170 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan[1
- Page 54 and 55: 172 Peter Philipkeywords: nonlinear
- Page 56 and 57: 174 Peter PhilipΩ g,3Ω sΩ sΩ g,
- Page 58 and 59: 176 Peter Philipusing the nonlocal
- Page 60 and 61:
178 Peter Philipsuch that (3) becom
- Page 62 and 63:
180 Peter PhilipDenition 8. Assume
- Page 64 and 65:
182 Peter Philip(b) If f ∈ L 1 (
- Page 66 and 67:
184 Peter Philipare related to weak
- Page 68 and 69:
186 Peter Philip(A-18) ɛ : Σ −
- Page 70 and 71:
188 Peter Philipω s,1 ω s,1ω s,1
- Page 72 and 73:
190 Peter PhilipThe approximation o
- Page 74 and 75:
192 Peter Philipvector ⃗u := (θ
- Page 76 and 77:
194 Peter Philip4.4 The Finite Volu
- Page 78 and 79:
196 Peter PhilipGeometry Temperatur
- Page 80 and 81:
198 Peter Philipdirectly as in (28)
- Page 82 and 83:
200 Peter Philiptimized solutions s
- Page 84 and 85:
202 Peter Philip[16] P.-É. Druet a
- Page 86 and 87:
204 Peter PhilipProceedings of the
- Page 88 and 89:
206 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 90 and 91:
208 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 92 and 93:
210 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 94 and 95:
212 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 96 and 97:
214 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 98 and 99:
216 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 100 and 101:
218 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 102 and 103:
220 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 104 and 105:
Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 106 and 107:
224 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 108 and 109:
226 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 110 and 111:
228 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 112 and 113:
230 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 114 and 115:
232 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 117 and 118:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 119 and 120:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 121 and 122:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 123 and 124:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 125 and 126:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 127 and 128:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 129 and 130:
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORSSUBMITTING M