132 Mihail Megan, Codruța StoicaRemark 5. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) is P.u.e.d. if <strong>and</strong> onlyif there exist some constants N ≥ 1 <strong>and</strong> α > 0 such that:(ued ′ 1 ) eα(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ N ‖P (x)v‖ ;(ued ′ 2 ) eα(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ N ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆ × Y .Remark 6. It is obvious that if C is P.u.e.d., then it is P.B.V.e.d.The following example shows that the converse implication is not valid.Example 6. We consider the metric space (X, d), the Banach space V <strong>and</strong>the evolution semiflow ϕ defined as in Example 3. Let us consider thecomplementary projections families P, Q : X → B(V ), P (x)v = (v 1 , 0),Q(x)v = (0, v 2 ), for all x ∈ X <strong>and</strong> all v = (v 1 , v 2 ) ∈ V , compatible with C.The mapping Φ : ∆ × X → B(V ), defined by=Φ(t, s, x)v =(v 1 e t sin t−s sin s−2(t−s)−R ts x(τ−s)dτ , v 2 e 3(t−s)−2t cos t+2s cos s+R ts x(τ−s)dτ )is an evolution cocycle over the evolution semiflow ϕ.We observe that for α = 1 + a we have thate α(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ e α(t−s) e −(1+a)t e (3+a)s ‖P (x)v‖ ≤ e 2s ‖P (x)v‖ ,for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆ × Y. Similarly,e α(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ e α(t−s) e −3t+3s+2t cos t−2s cos s−R ts x(τ−s)dτ ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖≤ ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆×Y. Thus, conditions (BV ed ′ 1 ) <strong>and</strong> (BV ed′ 2 ) are satisfiedforα = 1 + a, N = 1 <strong>and</strong> β = min{0, 2}.This shows that C = (Φ, ϕ) is P.B.V.e.d.If we suppose that C is P.u.e.d., then there exist N > 1 <strong>and</strong> α > 0 suchthate α(t−s) e t sin t−s sin s−2t+2s−R ts x(τ−s)dτ ≤ N,
Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spaces 133for all (t, s) ∈ ∆. In particular, for t = 2nπ + π 2<strong>and</strong> s = 2nπ, we obtain2nπ + (α − 1) π 2 ≤ ln N ∫ 2nπ+π2= ln N∫ π202nπx(u)du ≤ fwhich, for n → ∞, leads to a contradiction.4 Polynomial dichotomyx(τ − 2nπ)dτ =( π2)ln N,Let C : ∆×Y → Y , C(t, s, x, v) = (Φ(t, s, x)v, ϕ(t, s, x)) be a skew-evolutionsemiflow on Y <strong>and</strong> let P : X → B(V ) be a projections family on V , compatiblewith C, <strong>and</strong> Q : X → B(V ) the complementary projections family ofP .Definition 8. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) is polynomially dichotomicwith respect to P (<strong>and</strong> we denote P.p.d.) iff there exist α > 0,t 1 > 0 <strong>and</strong> a nondecreasing function N : R + → [1, ∞) such that:(pd 1 ) t α ‖Φ P (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ N(s)s α ‖Φ P (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ;(pd 2 ) t α ‖Φ Q (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ N(t)s α ‖Φ Q (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ,for all (t, s, t 0 , x 0 , v 0 ) ∈ T × Y with t 0 ≥ t 1 .Remark 7. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) is P.p.d. if <strong>and</strong> onlyif there exist α > 0, t 0 > 0 <strong>and</strong> a nondecreasing function N : R + → [1, ∞)such that:(pd ′ 1 ) tα ‖Φ P (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ N(s)s α ‖P (x)v‖ ;(pd ′ 2 ) tα ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ N(t)s α ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆ × Y with s ≥ t 0 .Example 7. We consider the metric space (X, d), the Banach space V <strong>and</strong>the evolution semiflow ϕ defined as in Example 3. Let us consider thecomplementary projections families P, Q : X → B(V ), P (x)v = (v 1 , 0),Q(x)v = (0, v 2 ), for all x ∈ X <strong>and</strong> all v = (v 1 , v 2 ) ∈ V , compatible with C.The mapping Φ : ∆ × X → B(V ), defined by( s + 1R tΦ(t, s, x)v =t + 1 e− s x(τ−s)dτ v 1 , t + 1)Rs + 1 e ts x(τ−s)dτ v 2
- Page 1: ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTSANNAL
- Page 4 and 5: Annals of the Academyof Romanian Sc
- Page 7 and 8: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 9 and 10: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 11 and 12: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 13: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 17 and 18: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 19 and 20: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 21 and 22: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 23 and 24: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 25 and 26: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 27 and 28: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 29 and 30: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 32 and 33: 150 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 34 and 35: 152 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanha
- Page 36 and 37: 154 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanLe
- Page 38 and 39: 156 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanBe
- Page 40 and 41: 158 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanwh
- Page 42 and 43: 160 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan1
- Page 44 and 45: 162 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan(i
- Page 46 and 47: 164 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 48 and 49: 166 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanth
- Page 50 and 51: 168 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan)w
- Page 52 and 53: 170 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan[1
- Page 54 and 55: 172 Peter Philipkeywords: nonlinear
- Page 56 and 57: 174 Peter PhilipΩ g,3Ω sΩ sΩ g,
- Page 58 and 59: 176 Peter Philipusing the nonlocal
- Page 60 and 61: 178 Peter Philipsuch that (3) becom
- Page 62 and 63: 180 Peter PhilipDenition 8. Assume
- Page 64 and 65:
182 Peter Philip(b) If f ∈ L 1 (
- Page 66 and 67:
184 Peter Philipare related to weak
- Page 68 and 69:
186 Peter Philip(A-18) ɛ : Σ −
- Page 70 and 71:
188 Peter Philipω s,1 ω s,1ω s,1
- Page 72 and 73:
190 Peter PhilipThe approximation o
- Page 74 and 75:
192 Peter Philipvector ⃗u := (θ
- Page 76 and 77:
194 Peter Philip4.4 The Finite Volu
- Page 78 and 79:
196 Peter PhilipGeometry Temperatur
- Page 80 and 81:
198 Peter Philipdirectly as in (28)
- Page 82 and 83:
200 Peter Philiptimized solutions s
- Page 84 and 85:
202 Peter Philip[16] P.-É. Druet a
- Page 86 and 87:
204 Peter PhilipProceedings of the
- Page 88 and 89:
206 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 90 and 91:
208 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 92 and 93:
210 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 94 and 95:
212 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 96 and 97:
214 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 98 and 99:
216 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 100 and 101:
218 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 102 and 103:
220 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 104 and 105:
Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 106 and 107:
224 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 108 and 109:
226 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 110 and 111:
228 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 112 and 113:
230 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 114 and 115:
232 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 117 and 118:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 119 and 120:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 121 and 122:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 123 and 124:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 125 and 126:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 127 and 128:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 129 and 130:
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORSSUBMITTING M