126 Mihail Megan, Codruța StoicaThe notion of exponential dichotomy for linear differential equations wasintroduced by O. Perron in 1930. The classic paper [12] of Perron served asa starting point for many works on the stability theory.The property of exponential dichotomy for linear differential equationshas gained prominence since the appereance of two fundamental monographsdue to J.L. Daleckiĭ <strong>and</strong> M.G. Kreĭn (see [6]) <strong>and</strong> J.L. Massera <strong>and</strong> J.J.Schäffer (see [8]).The notion of linear skew-product semiflow arises naturally when oneconsiders the linearization along an invariant manifold of a dynamical systemgenerated by a nonlinear differential equation (see [14], Chapter 4).Diverse <strong>and</strong> important concepts of dichotomy for linear skew-productsemiflows were studied by C. Chicone <strong>and</strong> Y. Latushkin in [4], S.N. Chow<strong>and</strong> H. Leiva in [5], R.J. Sacker <strong>and</strong> G.R. Sell in [13].The particular cases of exponential stability <strong>and</strong> exponential instabilityfor linear skew-product semiflows have been considered in [9] <strong>and</strong> [10] .In this paper we consider the general case of skew-evolution semiflows(introduced in our paper [11]) as a natural generalization of skew-productsemiflows. The major difference consists in the fact that a skew-evolutionsemiflow depends on three variables t, t 0 <strong>and</strong> x, while the classic conceptof skew-product semiflow depends only on t <strong>and</strong> x, thus justifying a furtherstudy of asymptotic behaviors for skew-evolution semiflows in a more generalcase, the nonuniform setting (relative to the third variable t 0 ).The aim of this paper is to define <strong>and</strong> exemplify various concepts of dichotomiesas exponential dichotomy, Barreira-Valls exponential dichotomy,uniform exponential dichotomy, polynomial dichotomy, Barreira-Valls polynomialdichotomy <strong>and</strong> uniform polynomial dichotomy, <strong>and</strong> to emphasize connectionsbetween them. Thus we consider generalizations of some asymptoticproperties for differential equations studied by L. Barreira <strong>and</strong> C. Valls in[1], [2] <strong>and</strong> [3].Some results concerning the properties of stability <strong>and</strong> instability forskew-evolution semiflows were published by us in [11], in [15] <strong>and</strong> in [16].The obtained results clarify the difference between uniform dichotomies<strong>and</strong> nonuniform dichotomies.
Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spaces 1272 Skew-evolution semiflowsLet us consider a metric space (X, d), a Banach space V <strong>and</strong> B(V ) thespace of all bounded linear operators from V into <strong>its</strong>elf. I is the identityoperator on V . We denote Y = X × V <strong>and</strong> we consider the following sets∆ = { (t, t 0 ) ∈ R 2 + : t ≥ t 0}<strong>and</strong> T ={(t, s, t0 ) ∈ R 3 + : t ≥ s ≥ t 0 ≥ 0 } .Definition 1. A mapping ϕ : ∆ × X → X is called evolution semiflow onX if the following relations hold:(s 1 ) ϕ(t, t, x) = x, ∀(t, x) ∈ R + × X;(s 2 ) ϕ(t, s, ϕ(s, t 0 , x)) = ϕ(t, t 0 , x), ∀(t, s), (s, t 0 ) ∈ ∆, x ∈ X.Definition 2. A mapping Φ : ∆×X → B(V ) is called evolution cocycle overan evolution semiflow ϕ if:(c 1 ) Φ(t, t, x) = I, ∀(t, x) ∈ R + × X;(c 2 ) Φ(t, s, ϕ(s, t 0 , x))Φ(s, t 0 , x) = Φ(t, t 0 , x), ∀(t, s), (s, t 0 ) ∈ ∆, x ∈ X.Definition 3. The mapping C : ∆ × Y → Y defined by the relationC(t, s, x, v) = (Φ(t, s, x)v, ϕ(t, s, x)),where Φ is an evolution cocycle over an evolution semiflow ϕ, is called skewevolutionsemiflow on Y .Remark 1. The concept of skew-evolution semiflow generalizes the notionof skew-product semiflow, considered <strong>and</strong> studied by M. Megan, A.L. Sasu<strong>and</strong> B. Sasu in [9] <strong>and</strong> [10], where the mappings ϕ <strong>and</strong> Φ do not depend onthe variables t ≥ 0 <strong>and</strong> x ∈ X.Example 1. Let E : ∆ → B(V ) be an evolution operator on V . If thereexists P : X → B(V ) with the propertiesP (x) 2 = P (x) <strong>and</strong> P (x)E(t, s) = E(t, s)P (x),for all (t, s, x) ∈ ∆ × X, then C = (Φ, ϕ), whereis a linear skew-evolution semiflow.Φ(t, s, x) = P (x)E(t, s), ϕ(t, s, x) = x
- Page 1: ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTSANNAL
- Page 4 and 5: Annals of the Academyof Romanian Sc
- Page 7: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 11 and 12: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 13 and 14: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 15 and 16: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 17 and 18: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 19 and 20: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 21 and 22: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 23 and 24: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 25 and 26: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 27 and 28: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 29 and 30: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 32 and 33: 150 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 34 and 35: 152 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanha
- Page 36 and 37: 154 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanLe
- Page 38 and 39: 156 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanBe
- Page 40 and 41: 158 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanwh
- Page 42 and 43: 160 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan1
- Page 44 and 45: 162 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan(i
- Page 46 and 47: 164 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 48 and 49: 166 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanth
- Page 50 and 51: 168 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan)w
- Page 52 and 53: 170 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan[1
- Page 54 and 55: 172 Peter Philipkeywords: nonlinear
- Page 56 and 57: 174 Peter PhilipΩ g,3Ω sΩ sΩ g,
- Page 58 and 59:
176 Peter Philipusing the nonlocal
- Page 60 and 61:
178 Peter Philipsuch that (3) becom
- Page 62 and 63:
180 Peter PhilipDenition 8. Assume
- Page 64 and 65:
182 Peter Philip(b) If f ∈ L 1 (
- Page 66 and 67:
184 Peter Philipare related to weak
- Page 68 and 69:
186 Peter Philip(A-18) ɛ : Σ −
- Page 70 and 71:
188 Peter Philipω s,1 ω s,1ω s,1
- Page 72 and 73:
190 Peter PhilipThe approximation o
- Page 74 and 75:
192 Peter Philipvector ⃗u := (θ
- Page 76 and 77:
194 Peter Philip4.4 The Finite Volu
- Page 78 and 79:
196 Peter PhilipGeometry Temperatur
- Page 80 and 81:
198 Peter Philipdirectly as in (28)
- Page 82 and 83:
200 Peter Philiptimized solutions s
- Page 84 and 85:
202 Peter Philip[16] P.-É. Druet a
- Page 86 and 87:
204 Peter PhilipProceedings of the
- Page 88 and 89:
206 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 90 and 91:
208 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 92 and 93:
210 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 94 and 95:
212 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 96 and 97:
214 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 98 and 99:
216 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 100 and 101:
218 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 102 and 103:
220 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 104 and 105:
Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 106 and 107:
224 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 108 and 109:
226 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 110 and 111:
228 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 112 and 113:
230 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 114 and 115:
232 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 117 and 118:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 119 and 120:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 121 and 122:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 123 and 124:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 125 and 126:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 127 and 128:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 129 and 130:
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORSSUBMITTING M