138 Mihail Megan, Codruța Stoica<strong>and</strong>t α‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ Nt α e −α(t−s) ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ Ns α ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆ × Y with s ≥ t 0 = 1.Finally, we obtain that C is P.u.p.d.Now, we give an example which shows that the converse of the precedingresult is not valid.Example 11. We consider the metric space (X, d), the Banach space V<strong>and</strong> the evolution semiflow ϕ defined as in Example 3. Let us consider thecomplementary projections families P, Q : X → B(V ), P (x)v = (v 1 , 0),Q(x)v = (0, v 2 ), for all x ∈ X <strong>and</strong> all v = (v 1 , v 2 ) ∈ V , compatible with C.We consider the evolution cocycle Φ : ∆ × X → B(V ), defined by( s 2 + 1R )tΦ(t, s, x)v =t 2 + 1 e− s x(τ−s)dτ v 1 , t2 + 1Rs 2 + 1 e ts x(τ−s)dτ v 2 ,for (t, s, x) ∈ ∆ × X <strong>and</strong> v = (v 1 , v 2 ) ∈ V = R 2 . Using the inequalitieswe obtains 2 + 1t 2 + 1 ≤ s tes<strong>and</strong>e t ≤ s , for t ≥ s ≥ 1,tt α ‖Φ P (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ tα (s 2 + 1)t 2 e −a(t−s) ‖P (x)v‖+ 1≤ tα · s( s) a= s α ‖P (x)v‖ ,t tfor all t ≥ s ≥ t 0 = 1 <strong>and</strong> (x, v) ∈ Y , where α = 1 + a.Similarly,t α ‖Q(x)v‖ = t · t a ≤ ts a e at e −as ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ t s sα e a(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖≤ sα (t 2 + 1)s 2 + 1 ea(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ s α ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all t ≥ s ≥ t 0 = 1 <strong>and</strong> (x, v) ∈ Y , with α = 1 + a. Thus, C is P.u.p.d.If we suppose that C is P.u.e.d., then there exist N ≥ 1, α > 0 <strong>and</strong> t 0 > 0such that(s 2 + 1)e α(t−s) ≤ N(t 2 + 1)e −a(t−s) ,for all t ≥ s ≥ t 0 . Then, for s = t 0 <strong>and</strong> t → ∞, we obtain a contradiction,which can be eliminated only if C is not P.u.e.d.
Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spaces 139Acknowledgement. This work was supported by CNCSIS–UEFISCSU,project number PN II–IDEI 1080/2008. The authors wish to express specialthanks to the reviewers for their helpful suggestions, which led to theimprovement of this paper.References[1] L. Barreira, C. Valls. Stability of Nonautonomous Differential Equations.Lect. Notes Math. 1926, 2008.[2] L. Barreira, C. Valls. Polynomial growth rates. Nonlinear Analysis.71:5208–5219, 2009.[3] L. Barreira, C. Valls. Existence of nonuniform exponential dichotomies<strong>and</strong> a Fredholm alternative. Nonlinear Analysis. 71:5220–5228, 2009.[4] C. Chicone, Y. Latushkin. Evolution semigroups in dynamical systems<strong>and</strong> differential equations. Mathematical Surveys <strong>and</strong> Monographs,Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Isl<strong>and</strong>, 70, 1999.[5] S.N. Chow, H. Leiva. Existence <strong>and</strong> roughness of the exponential dichotomyfor linear skew-product semiflows in Banach spaces. J. DifferentialEquations. 120:429–477, 1995.[6] J.L. Daleckiĭ, M.G. Kreĭn. Stability of solutions of differential equationsin Banach space. Translations of Mathematical Monographs, Amer.Math. Soc., Providence, Rhode Isl<strong>and</strong>, 43, 1974.[7] N.T. Huy. Existence <strong>and</strong> robustness of exponential dichotomy for linearskew-product semiflows. J. Math. Anal. Appl. 33:731-752, 2007.[8] J.L. Massera, J.J. Schäffer. Linear Differential Equations <strong>and</strong> FunctionSpaces. Pure Appl. Math. 21 Academic Press, New York-London, 1966.[9] M. Megan, A.L. Sasu, B. Sasu. On uniform exponential stability of linearskew-product semiflows in Banach spaces. Bull. Belg. Math. Soc. SimonStevin. 9:143–154, 2002.
- Page 1: ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTSANNAL
- Page 4 and 5: Annals of the Academyof Romanian Sc
- Page 7 and 8: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 9 and 10: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 11 and 12: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 13 and 14: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 15 and 16: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 17 and 18: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 19: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 23 and 24: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 25 and 26: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 27 and 28: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 29 and 30: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 32 and 33: 150 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 34 and 35: 152 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanha
- Page 36 and 37: 154 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanLe
- Page 38 and 39: 156 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanBe
- Page 40 and 41: 158 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanwh
- Page 42 and 43: 160 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan1
- Page 44 and 45: 162 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan(i
- Page 46 and 47: 164 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 48 and 49: 166 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanth
- Page 50 and 51: 168 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan)w
- Page 52 and 53: 170 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan[1
- Page 54 and 55: 172 Peter Philipkeywords: nonlinear
- Page 56 and 57: 174 Peter PhilipΩ g,3Ω sΩ sΩ g,
- Page 58 and 59: 176 Peter Philipusing the nonlocal
- Page 60 and 61: 178 Peter Philipsuch that (3) becom
- Page 62 and 63: 180 Peter PhilipDenition 8. Assume
- Page 64 and 65: 182 Peter Philip(b) If f ∈ L 1 (
- Page 66 and 67: 184 Peter Philipare related to weak
- Page 68 and 69: 186 Peter Philip(A-18) ɛ : Σ −
- Page 70 and 71:
188 Peter Philipω s,1 ω s,1ω s,1
- Page 72 and 73:
190 Peter PhilipThe approximation o
- Page 74 and 75:
192 Peter Philipvector ⃗u := (θ
- Page 76 and 77:
194 Peter Philip4.4 The Finite Volu
- Page 78 and 79:
196 Peter PhilipGeometry Temperatur
- Page 80 and 81:
198 Peter Philipdirectly as in (28)
- Page 82 and 83:
200 Peter Philiptimized solutions s
- Page 84 and 85:
202 Peter Philip[16] P.-É. Druet a
- Page 86 and 87:
204 Peter PhilipProceedings of the
- Page 88 and 89:
206 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 90 and 91:
208 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 92 and 93:
210 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 94 and 95:
212 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 96 and 97:
214 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 98 and 99:
216 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 100 and 101:
218 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 102 and 103:
220 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 104 and 105:
Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 106 and 107:
224 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 108 and 109:
226 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 110 and 111:
228 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 112 and 113:
230 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 114 and 115:
232 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 117 and 118:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 119 and 120:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 121 and 122:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 123 and 124:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 125 and 126:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 127 and 128:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 129 and 130:
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORSSUBMITTING M