130 Mihail Megan, Codruța StoicaDefinition 5. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) is exponentially dichotomicrelative to the projections family P : X → B(V ) (<strong>and</strong> we denoteP.e.d.) iff there exist a constant α > 0 <strong>and</strong> a nondecreasing mappingN : R + → [1, ∞) such that:(ed 1 ) e α(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ N(s) ‖Φ P (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ;(ed 2 ) e α(t−s) ‖Φ Q (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ N(t) ‖Φ Q (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ,for all (t, s, t 0 , x 0 , v 0 ) ∈ T × Y , where Q is the complementary of P .Remark 2. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) is P.e.d. if <strong>and</strong> only ifthere exist a constant α > 0 <strong>and</strong> a nondecreasing mapping N : R + → [1, ∞)such that:(ed ′ 1 ) eα(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ N(s) ‖P (x)v‖ ;(ed ′ 2 ) eα(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ N(t) ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆ × Y .A particular case of P.e.d. is given byDefinition 6. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (ϕ, Φ) is called Barreira-Valls exponentially dichotomic relative to the projections family P : X →B(V ) (<strong>and</strong> we denote P.B.V.e.d.) iff there exist N ≥ 1, α > 0 <strong>and</strong> β ≥ 0such that:(BV ed 1 ) e α(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ Ne βs ‖Φ P (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖;(BV ed 2 ) e α(t−s) ‖Φ Q (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ Ne βt ‖Φ Q (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ,for all (t, s, t 0 , x 0 , v 0 ) ∈ T × Y .Remark 3. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) is P.B.V.e.d. if <strong>and</strong>only if there exist N ≥ 1, α > 0 <strong>and</strong> β ≥ 0 such that:(BV ed ′ 1 ) eα(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ Ne βs ‖P (x)v‖(BV ed ′ 2 ) eα(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ Ne βt ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆ × Y .Remark 4. It is obvious that if C is P.B.V.e.d., then it is P.e.d.The converse is not true, fact illustrated byExample 5. We consider the metric space (X, d), the Banach space V <strong>and</strong>the evolution semiflow ϕ defined as in Example 3. Let us consider thecomplementary projections families P, Q : X → B(V ), P (x)v = (v 1 , 0),Q(x)v = (0, v 2 ), for all x ∈ X <strong>and</strong> all v = (v 1 , v 2 ) ∈ V , compatible with C.
Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spaces 131Let g : R + → [1, ∞) be a continuous function with(g(n) = e n·22n <strong>and</strong> g n + 1 )2 2n = e 4 , for all n ∈ N.The mapping Φ : ∆ × X → B(V ), defined by( g(s)tΦ(t, s, x)v =g(t) e−(t−s)−R s x(τ−s)dτ v 1 , g(s))tg(t) et−s+R s x(τ−s)dτ v 2is an evolution cocycle over the evolution semiflow ϕ.We observe that for α = 1 + a we have that<strong>and</strong>e α(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, s, x)v‖ ≤ g(s) ‖P (x)v‖e α(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ g(s)e α(t−s) ‖Q(x)v‖ ≤ g(t) ‖Φ Q (t, s, x)v‖ ,for all (t, s, x, v) ∈ ∆ × Y. Thus, conditions (ed ′ 1 ) <strong>and</strong> (ed′ 2 ) are satisfied forα = 1 + a <strong>and</strong> N(t) = sup g(s)s∈[0,t]<strong>and</strong>, hence, C = (Φ, ϕ) is P.e.d.If we suppose that C is P.B.V.e.d., then there exist N ≥ 1, α > 0 <strong>and</strong>β ≥ 0 such thatg(s)e αt ≤ Ng(t)e βs+t−s+R ts x(τ−s)dτ ,for all (t, s, x) ∈ ∆ × X.From here, for t = n + 1 <strong>and</strong> s = n, it follows that22n e n(22n +α−β) ≤ 81Ne 1−α+f(0)2 2n ,which, for n → ∞, implies a contradiction.Another particular case of P.e.d. is introduced byDefinition 7. The skew-evolution semiflow C = (Φ, ϕ) is uniformly exponentiallydichotomic relative to the projections family P : X → B(V ) (<strong>and</strong>we denote P.u.e.d.) iff there exist some constants N ≥ 1 <strong>and</strong> α > 0 suchthat:(ued 1 ) e α(t−s) ‖Φ P (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ N ‖Φ P (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ;(ued 2 ) e α(t−s) ‖Φ Q (s, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ≤ N ‖Φ Q (t, t 0 , x 0 )v 0 ‖ ,for all (t, s, t 0 , x 0 , v 0 ) ∈ T × Y .
- Page 1: ACADEMY OF ROMANIAN SCIENTISTSANNAL
- Page 4 and 5: Annals of the Academyof Romanian Sc
- Page 7 and 8: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 9 and 10: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 11: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 15 and 16: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 17 and 18: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 19 and 20: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 21 and 22: Concepts of dichotomy in Banach spa
- Page 23 and 24: Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 25 and 26: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 27 and 28: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 29 and 30: Robust stability of discrete-time l
- Page 32 and 33: 150 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 34 and 35: 152 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanha
- Page 36 and 37: 154 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanLe
- Page 38 and 39: 156 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanBe
- Page 40 and 41: 158 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanwh
- Page 42 and 43: 160 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan1
- Page 44 and 45: 162 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan(i
- Page 46 and 47: 164 Vasile Dragan, Toader MorozanWe
- Page 48 and 49: 166 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozanth
- Page 50 and 51: 168 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan)w
- Page 52 and 53: 170 Vasile Dragan, Toader Morozan[1
- Page 54 and 55: 172 Peter Philipkeywords: nonlinear
- Page 56 and 57: 174 Peter PhilipΩ g,3Ω sΩ sΩ g,
- Page 58 and 59: 176 Peter Philipusing the nonlocal
- Page 60 and 61: 178 Peter Philipsuch that (3) becom
- Page 62 and 63:
180 Peter PhilipDenition 8. Assume
- Page 64 and 65:
182 Peter Philip(b) If f ∈ L 1 (
- Page 66 and 67:
184 Peter Philipare related to weak
- Page 68 and 69:
186 Peter Philip(A-18) ɛ : Σ −
- Page 70 and 71:
188 Peter Philipω s,1 ω s,1ω s,1
- Page 72 and 73:
190 Peter PhilipThe approximation o
- Page 74 and 75:
192 Peter Philipvector ⃗u := (θ
- Page 76 and 77:
194 Peter Philip4.4 The Finite Volu
- Page 78 and 79:
196 Peter PhilipGeometry Temperatur
- Page 80 and 81:
198 Peter Philipdirectly as in (28)
- Page 82 and 83:
200 Peter Philiptimized solutions s
- Page 84 and 85:
202 Peter Philip[16] P.-É. Druet a
- Page 86 and 87:
204 Peter PhilipProceedings of the
- Page 88 and 89:
206 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 90 and 91:
208 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 92 and 93:
210 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 94 and 95:
212 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 96 and 97:
214 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 98 and 99:
216 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 100 and 101:
218 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 102 and 103:
220 Nicolae Cîndea, Marius Tucsnak
- Page 104 and 105:
Annals of the Academy of Romanian S
- Page 106 and 107:
224 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 108 and 109:
226 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 110 and 111:
228 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 112 and 113:
230 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 114 and 115:
232 Klaus Krumbiegel, Ira Neitzel,
- Page 117 and 118:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 119 and 120:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 121 and 122:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 123 and 124:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 125 and 126:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 127 and 128:
Sufficient optimality conditions fo
- Page 129 and 130:
INFORMATION FOR AUTHORSSUBMITTING M