12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5.1 Flexural Structural WallsAn example <strong>of</strong> the behaviour <strong>of</strong> flexural walls is shown in Figure 8. Initially the wallstiffness is high. Yielding <strong>of</strong> the steel reinforcement in ductile flexural walls occursat drift values <strong>of</strong> approximately 0.8%. The drift limits corresponding to variousdamage states <strong>of</strong> ductile flexural walls are listed in Table 2.5.2 Squat Shear WallsThe relationship between damage and drift ratio for squat walls is shown in Figure 8.Initially under low levels <strong>of</strong> load, the behaviour <strong>of</strong> the squat wall is the same asductile flexural walls. However, when shear cracks occur and are not arrested, thewall stiffness degrades rapidly reflecting a substantial increase in damage leading toabrupt failure. In the case <strong>of</strong> squat walls, it was experimentally observed that damageindex <strong>of</strong> 0.3 represents the limit <strong>of</strong> repairable damage. This limit corresponds torelatively low drift ratio value <strong>of</strong> 0.4%. The steel yield point is normally not reachedbefore shear failure occurs. The drift limit corresponding to various states <strong>of</strong> damage<strong>of</strong> squat shear walls are listed in Table 2.10.8Damage index0.60.40.20Squat shear wallFlexural wall0 1 2 3Drift ratio %Figure 8. Shear and flexural behaviour <strong>of</strong> walls (Khalil and Ghobarah 2003).331

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!