12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

AN OUTLINE OF AIJ GUIDELINES FOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONOF EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDINGSToshimi KABEYASAWA*ABSTRACTThis paper outlines AIJ guidelines for seismic performance evaluation published in January2004 as a draft. The guidelines provides deterministic and probabilistic methods <strong>of</strong> evaluatingseismic performance level <strong>of</strong> a reinforced concrete building which has been designed in detailbased on an appropriate design guidelines. The limit states <strong>of</strong> the structures are selected on theinelastic load-deformation curve by estimating the post-earthquake damage levels <strong>of</strong> memberscorresponding to the performance objectives as: (1) serviceability, (2) minor repair, (3) majorrepair, and (4) safety. The deterministic procedure evaluates the basic seismic capacity indexfor each limit state, which is defined as the amplitude ratio <strong>of</strong> the capacity earthquake to thestandard earthquake, where the capacity earthquake is to induce the response equal to the limitstate. The probabilistic evaluation method is provided as an additional procedure, where theperformance level is expressed using the probability <strong>of</strong> exceeding the limit state by site-specificearthquakes during design service life.Keywords: Limit states; Seismic performance evaluation; Serviceability; Reparability;Safety.1. INTRODUCTIONThe Architectural Institute <strong>of</strong> Japan has proposed a series <strong>of</strong> seismic design guidelinesfor reinforced concrete buildings[1][2], where calculation methods and detailing <strong>of</strong>reinforced concrete members are presented to assure ductile overall mechanism. Theevaluation methods, especially for ultimate strength and deformability <strong>of</strong> members,proposed in these guidelines, have not only promoted research as a model code butalso have been used in advanced practical design.On the other hand, the Building Standard Law <strong>of</strong> Japan was revised in 2001,where design earthquake response spectrum was explicitly specified at the bedrockand the design method <strong>of</strong> comparing the inelastic response with the limit states wasintroduced as the design criteria, called as “limit strength design method.” Although,the basic concepts for defining the limit states were specified, the detailed and generalcalculation methods were not specified._____________Earthquake Research Institute, <strong>University</strong> <strong>of</strong> TokyoAddress: 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan, E-mail: kabe@eri.u-tokyo.ac.jp27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!