12.07.2015 Views

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

Report - PEER - University of California, Berkeley

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

9. CONCLUSIONThe new AIJ Guidelines is outlined, which provides deterministic and probabilisticmethods <strong>of</strong> evaluating the actual seismic performance level <strong>of</strong> a designed reinforcedconcrete building. The limit states <strong>of</strong> the structures are defined based on the residualdamage rates <strong>of</strong> members corresponding to the performance objectives as: (1)serviceability, (2) minor repair, (3) major repair, and (4) safety. The deterministicprocedure evaluates the basic seismic capacity index for each limit state, which isdefined as the amplitude ratio <strong>of</strong> the capacity earthquake to the standard earthquake,where the capacity earthquake is to induce the response equal to the limit state. Theprobabilistic evaluation method is provided as an additional procedure, where theperformance level is expressed using the probability <strong>of</strong> exceeding the limit state bysite-specific earthquakes during design service life.The Guidelines is being translated into English and the English version is to bepublished from AIJ in the near future. We hope the Guidelines will be referred widelyas research and technical documents as well as model code <strong>of</strong> practice for seismicperformance evaluation. It is expected that more sophisticated alternative methodswill be proposed based on reliable verification through intensive research in the future.ACKNOWLEDGEMENTThe Guidelines was drafted by members <strong>of</strong> the Subcommittee on performanceevaluation and limit states, the Steering committee on reinforced concrete structures,the Architectural Institute <strong>of</strong> Japan, including drafting WG members: ToshimiKabeyasawa, Toshikatsu Ichinose, Daisuke Kato, Hitoshi Tanaka, Yuuki Sakai,Hiroshi Kuramoto, Hideyuki Kinugasa, Taizo Matsumori, Nobuyuki Izumi, KazuhiroKitayama, Masaki Meda, Kazuaki Tsuda, Masaru Teraoka, and Hajime Okano. Theefforts <strong>of</strong> above members as well as reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.REFERENCES[1] Architectural Institute <strong>of</strong> Japan. (1990). Design Guidelines for Earthquake-Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings Based on Ultimate Strength Concept1988(draft), 1990 (the first edition in Japanese), 1994 (in English version), AIJ,Tokyo.[2] Architectural Institute <strong>of</strong> Japan. (1999). Design Guidelines for Earthquake-Resistant Reinforced Concrete Buildings Based on Inelastic DisplacementConcept 1997 (draft), 1999 (the first edition in Japanese), AIJ, Tokyo.[3] Architectural Institute <strong>of</strong> Japan. (2004). Guidelines for Seismic PerformanceEvaluation <strong>of</strong> Reinforced Concrete Buildings, 2004 (draft), AIJ, Tokyo.38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!