29.11.2012 Views

2009 ADR v2 Atlas of ESRD - United States Renal Data System

2009 ADR v2 Atlas of ESRD - United States Renal Data System

2009 ADR v2 Atlas of ESRD - United States Renal Data System

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5<br />

App A<br />

pg 366<br />

REFERENCE SECTION A<br />

The Reference Tables present parallel sets <strong>of</strong> counts and rates for<br />

incidence (Section A) and December 31 point prevalence (Section B).<br />

Section B also presents annual period prevalent counts and counts<br />

<strong>of</strong> lost-to-follow-up patients. Because the U.S. population figures<br />

(shown in Reference Section M) used in the <strong>ADR</strong> include only residents<br />

<strong>of</strong> the 50 states and the District <strong>of</strong> Columbia, tables also focus<br />

on patients from these areas. Exceptions are Tables A.1, A.a, A.6, A.8,<br />

A.10, and A.c, all <strong>of</strong> which present data specific to patients in Puerto<br />

Rico and the Territories, or include these patients in the patient<br />

population. Age is computed as <strong>of</strong> the beginning <strong>of</strong> <strong>ESRD</strong> therapy.<br />

Rates in Table A.9 are calculated using the model-based method<br />

(described in the Statistical Methods section later in this appendix),<br />

and adjusted for age, race, and gender, with the 2005 national<br />

population as reference.<br />

REFERENCE SECTION B<br />

With the exception <strong>of</strong> Tables B.1, B.6, B.8, and B.10, these tables<br />

focus on patients in the 50 states and the District <strong>of</strong> Columbia. Age<br />

is calculated as <strong>of</strong> December 31. Table B.9 is constructed similarly<br />

to Table A.9.<br />

Patient characteristics<br />

Chapter Three; C tables<br />

<strong>Data</strong> used in this chapter are obtained from the ME form.<br />

Figure 3.1 includes 2007 incident hemodialysis patients with ME<br />

forms. Access type and primary cause are identified from the ME<br />

form, and data exclude patients with unknown access type.<br />

Figure 3.5 includes incident hemodialysis patients who have valid<br />

EPO claims during each <strong>of</strong> the first four months after initiation.<br />

Treatment modalities<br />

Chapter Four; D tables<br />

Chapter Four and the associated reference tables describe the treatment<br />

modalities <strong>of</strong> all known <strong>ESRD</strong> patients, both Medicare and<br />

non-Medicare, who are not classified as lost-to-follow-up or having<br />

recovered renal function (RRF). The RRF event, introduced in<br />

the 2007 <strong>ADR</strong>, is defined as an event that occurs within the first 180<br />

days <strong>of</strong> <strong>ESRD</strong> initiation and lasts for at least 90 days. Unless noted<br />

otherwise, incident and point prevalent cohorts without the 60-day<br />

stable modality rule are used in the analyses. Treatment modalities<br />

are defined here as follows:<br />

4 center hemodialysis: hemodialysis treatment received at a<br />

dialysis center<br />

4 center self-hemodialysis: hemodialysis administered by the<br />

patient at a dialysis center; a category usually combined with<br />

center hemodialysis<br />

4 home hemodialysis: hemodialysis administered by the patient<br />

at home; cannot always be reliably identified in the database<br />

4 CAPD: continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis; usually<br />

combined with CCPD<br />

4 CCPD: continuous cycling peritoneal dialysis; usually combined<br />

with CAPD<br />

4 peritoneal dialysis: analyses typically consist <strong>of</strong> CAPD and<br />

CCPD only, unless stated otherwise<br />

4 other peritoneal dialysis: primarily intermittent peritoneal<br />

dialysis (IPD), a small category except among very young children;<br />

usually combined with unknown dialysis and uncertain<br />

dialysis to form an other/unknown dialysis category<br />

4 uncertain dialysis: a period in which the dialysis type is<br />

unknown or multiple modalities occur but none last 60<br />

days; usually combined with other peritoneal dialysis (IPD)<br />

and unknown dialysis to form an other/unknown dialysis<br />

category<br />

4 unknown dialysis: a period in which the dialysis modality<br />

is not known (e.g. when dialysis sessions are performed in<br />

a hospital); usually combined with other peritoneal dialysis<br />

(IPD) and uncertain dialysis to form an other/unknown<br />

dialysis category<br />

4 renal transplantation: a functioning graft from either a living<br />

donor (a blood relative or other living person) or a cadaveric<br />

donor<br />

4 death: a category not appearing in the year-end modality<br />

tables, which report only living patients, but used as an outcome<br />

(e.g. in tables showing living patients followed for a<br />

period <strong>of</strong> time for their modality treatment history)<br />

Modality and provider characteristics are presented in Figures 4.3<br />

and 4.6. For a description <strong>of</strong> the provider data used in these figures,<br />

please see the discussion <strong>of</strong> Chapter Ten. All provider-related figures<br />

include only dialysis patients. Figures 4.4 and 4.7 show modality<br />

and payor information, while Tables c–d and Figures 4.9–14 provide<br />

a closer look at the demographic and geographic variations <strong>of</strong><br />

home hemodialysis patients.<br />

Rates by age are adjusted for gender and race, rates by gender are<br />

adjusted for age and race, rates by race and ethnicity are adjusted<br />

for age and gender, and rates by primary diagnosis are adjusted for<br />

age, gender, and race.<br />

REFERENCE SECTION D<br />

Reference Section D is divided into four sections. The first, Tables<br />

D.1–11 and D.15–16, provides counts and percentages — by demographics,<br />

geographic location, and treatment modality — <strong>of</strong> incident<br />

and prevalent patients alive at the end <strong>of</strong> each year. Age is computed<br />

as <strong>of</strong> the start <strong>of</strong> <strong>ESRD</strong> for incident patients, and as <strong>of</strong> December 31<br />

for point prevalent patients.<br />

Table D.12 shows modality at day 90 and two years after first<br />

service for all incident Medicare patients beginning renal replacement<br />

therapy from 2003 to 2005. The 90-day rule is used to exclude<br />

patients who die during the first 90 days <strong>of</strong> <strong>ESRD</strong>, and age is computed<br />

as <strong>of</strong> the first <strong>ESRD</strong> service date.<br />

The third section, Tables D.13–14, presents counts <strong>of</strong> prevalent<br />

patients alive at the end <strong>of</strong> each year, by <strong>ESRD</strong> exposure time and<br />

modality. Table D.13 shows counts by the number <strong>of</strong> years <strong>of</strong> <strong>ESRD</strong>,<br />

while Table D.14 presents counts by the number <strong>of</strong> years on the end<strong>of</strong>-year<br />

treatment modality. For the duration <strong>of</strong> <strong>ESRD</strong> exposure, zero<br />

should be read as less than one year, one as at least one full year but<br />

less than two, and so on.<br />

The fourth section, Tables D.17–22, presents counts <strong>of</strong> incident<br />

and prevalent patients alive at the end <strong>of</strong> selected years (i.e. 1999,<br />

2003, 2007), by demographic characteristics, payor category, and<br />

treatment modality. Again, age is computed as <strong>of</strong> the start <strong>of</strong> <strong>ESRD</strong><br />

for incident patients, and as <strong>of</strong> December 31 for point prevalent<br />

patients. The definitions <strong>of</strong> payor categories can be found under<br />

“<strong>Data</strong>base definitions” at the beginning <strong>of</strong> this appendix.<br />

Clinical care & preventive health<br />

Chapter Five<br />

In Figure 5.1, for both Kt/V measurements, 2005 <strong>ESRD</strong> CPM data<br />

are used to calculate a mean Kt/V value for each patient from the<br />

1–3 values present for each, and the percent <strong>of</strong> patients with a mean<br />

Kt/V over a certain threshold is determined. For prevalent hemo-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!