Working Group Report on - Haryana Kisan Ayog

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3.0 PROSPECTS AND STRATEGIES FOR FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT3.1. Haryana Fisheries 2022Based on the assessment of resource status, anticipated technological out flow andpossible management interventions, two sets of fish production targets for the next10 years, one for the XII Plan Period of 2012-17 and another for the XII Plan Periodof 2017-22 have been visualised and presented in the table 3.1.Table 3.1 Haryana Fish Production Targets 2017 and 2022Sl.No.Resource TypeNo.1. Village ponds (natural) 6000 17,225 17,225 6000 1,03,350 17,225 10,000 1,72,2502. Private ponds 2000 1,840 2000 6000 12,000 2000 12,000 24,000(man-made)3. Marshy area - 2,000 1000 2500 2,500 2000 5,000 10,0004. Salt Affected - 20,000 5000 2500 12,500 10000 10,000 1,00,000water area5. Critical waterlogged - 2,000 2000 2500 5,000 2000 10,000 20,000area6. Micro-watershed 189 3,780 3780 2500 9,450 3780 6,000 22,6807. Effective length for - 3790 1500 300 450 3000 600 1800for fisheries from majorcanals & tributarieskm km kg/km km(total length-16647km8. Man-made lakes 10 444 - - - - - -9. Natural Lakes 9 4,147 - - - - - -10. Natural flowing water 108 3407 - - - - - -(2 Rivers, 12 rivulets&94 drains)Total Resource Area, 58,632 32,505 4,468 1,45,250 40,005 8,767 3,50,730Targeted AUC, Productivity ha ha kg/ha tonnes ha ha tonnes& ProductionAUC=Area Under CultureAreaAvailable(ha)Fish Production Targets Fish Production Targets20172022TargetTarget TargetTarget Target TargetYield Production Yield ProductionAUC (kg/ha) (tonnes) AUC (kg/ha) (tonnes)A perspective plan is often a heuristic exercise in spite of detailed empirical basis,and hence the targets shall be considered more as guiding posts rather than as fixedmantras. It is estimated, on the conservative side, that the total fish productionfrom Haryana can be enhanced to 1,45,250 tonnes by 2017 from the present( 30 )
one lakh tonnes with expected annual growth rate of about 10%. The increasewould come primarily from bringing one fourth of suitable salt affected areas andthe all the identified water logged areas under aquaculture. Technology being new,the productivity expectation from these resources is kept at the minimal 2500 kg/ha.In addition, it is assumed that the productivity gain from existing pond resourceswould be marginal as they are already fully exploited.However, if new candidate species with high growth rate like Pangasianodonhypophthalmus finds greater consumer and grower acceptance in the immediatefuture, the productivity gain will be significant as visualised during XII Plan.Similarly, greater technological success of shrimp culture (either tiger or white legshrimp) in salt affected areas would witness a quantum jump in both areas underculture as well as unit area productivity as visualised during XII Plan. Hence, undersuch a scenario the expected fish production (3,50,730 tonnes) by the end of XIIPlan (2017-22)would be nearly two and a half times that of XII plan target.It must be evident that in both Plan periods nil production is expected from thenatural capture based fisheries resources (lake and rivers) as they shall beearmarked exclusively for biodiversity conservation purposes and be out of boundsfor commercial exploitation. Also, it is assumed that requisite input support in theform of quality seed, feed, credit / financial support, technological backstopping,policy support and budgetary support as outlined below would be forthcoming tomake the targets feasible.The major approach for each of the approach during the next ten years is brieflyoutlined below while the individual issues and options in the form of action pointsare discussed in the next Chapter.3.2. Enhanced and Conservation Oriented Fisheries in Lakes, Riversand CanalsRestoration of biodiversity and fisheries enhancement shall be the twin strategy forthe natural water bodies (lakes and rivers) in the State for the next 10 years. All thelakes and rivers shall be declared as fish sanctuaries and commercial fishingprohibited through regulation. Ranching of endemic fish species would help in( 31 )
Page 1: Working Gr
Page 4: CitationWorking <s
Page 7 and 8: DIRECTOR/VICE CHANCELLORCIFE, ICAR
Page 9 and 10: ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSWe are highly grate
Page 11 and 12: ABBREVIATIONSADOsARTIAUCBFScCCSHAUC
Page 13 and 14: EXECUTIVE SUMMARYHaryana is one of
Page 15 and 16: harvest handling practices, storage
Page 17 and 18: or undersized weak seed. Inbreeding
Page 19 and 20: communication between farming commu
Page 21 and 22: 1.0 INTRODUCTIONFisheries and aquac
Page 23 and 24: 2.0 STATUS OF FISHERIES DEVELOPMENT
Page 25 and 26: Canal System cutting across the Sta
Page 27 and 28: Considering the total area in each
Page 29 and 30: area under culture in this category
Page 31 and 32: y about 6% annually. For the same p
Page 33 and 34: Performance of Fish Farmers Develop
Page 35 and 36: Fish seed production and hatcheries
Page 37 and 38: Though the structural constraints l
Page 39 and 40: Haryana as compared to the national
Page 41 and 42: other States given the moratorium o
Page 43 and 44: Human Resource DevelopmentRecognisi
Page 45 and 46: Linkages with Development Departmen
Page 47 and 48: • The human capital of Haryana in
Page 49: d) Threats• Increasing and compet
Page 53 and 54: present infrastructure in the State
Page 55 and 56: 4.2. Technological Issues and Optio
Page 57 and 58: R&D options are developing and stre
Page 59 and 60: markets through a network of women
Page 61 and 62: Aquaculture Development MissionThe
Page 63 and 64: within one year period. Therefore,
Page 65 and 66: Lack of product as well as process
Page 67 and 68: The State should focus on reviving
Page 69 and 70: Annexure IHaryana Kisan Ayog headed
Page 71 and 72: 3. Meetings HeldDate Venue Remark26
Page 73: www.haryanakisanayog.org

Working Group Report on - Haryana Kisan Ayog

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?