iMaintenance - Bilfinger

More documents

Recommendations

Info

iMaintenance - the ideaExisting situationDemocase Hannover Messe 2013Static maintenance intervals:▪ No review of the maintenance intervals▪ No allowance made for use-based capacity utilisation▪ Environmental conditions not factored inPurpose of iMaintenanceTo determine the optimum maintenance intervaliMaintenance – next-generation maintenance via intelligent applications page 4
iMaintenance – the ideaExisting situationDemocase Hannover Messe 2013Maintenance and inspection is scheduled on a time basisregardless of the condition and utilisation of the plantProblem• Maintenance intervals static and scheduled on a timebasis• No check of the time-based intervals in the life cycleof the industrial asset• No feedback from maintenance staff on themaintenance performed• No link between plant management and maintenanceinstrumentsEffect• Generally more maintenance performed than required• Occasional down time even after (time-based)inspection• Intervals remain static due to lack of information onduration and insufficient ability to assess the plant(as well as a lack of process data)• No early error detection possibleiMaintenance – next-generation maintenance via intelligent applicationspage 5
Page 3: The idea behind iMaintenanceDemocas
Page 8 and 9: Subjective evaluationStatic vs. dyn
Page 10 and 11: Modular structureModule 1Democase H
Page 12 and 13: Modular structureModule 3Democase H
Page 14 and 15: System architectureOverviewDemocase

iMaintenance - Bilfinger

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?