Alexander I. Kazarinov,Chief Accountantservices decreased from 18 to11%, primarily because of thetransfer of some auxiliary func−tions to subcontractors. At thesame time, amortization costsincreased from 9 to 17% of to−tal costs and total taxation grewfrom 3 to 13% compared to theOperating costsIn <strong>2004</strong>, the company activelytook steps to decrease the costfigures for 2003. The percent−age of salaries as a share of totalcosts was constant at 21%.These changes − both in totalcosts and in the breakdown ofcosts − are a result of produc−tion plants reaching their projectof producing precious metals. Be−cause all of <strong>Polymetal</strong>’s produc−tion facilities are either focusedon gold or silver production (withcapacities. Since precious metalsmining is a material− and cost−in−tensive industry, most costs arefixed−cost expenditures. Thus, in−creasing production leads to low−er per unit production costs.the other precious metal as a co−product), total cash costs werecalculated based on Gold InstituteStandards .Company Deposit UnitTotal cash costs<strong>2004</strong> 2003 <strong>2004</strong>/2003Northern Urals Gold Vorontsovskoye $US/oz Au 221 130 70,1%Okhotsk Mining and Geological Company Khakanjinskoye $US/oz Au 114 − −Magadan Silver, Silver Territory Dukat, Lunnoye $US/oz Ag 1,68 2,55 (34,1%)Notes:for the Vorontsovskoye and Khakanjinskoye deposits, silver is a co−product;for the Dukat and Lunnoye deposits, gold is a co−product;production of precious metals at the Dukat and Lunnoye deposits is a single technological process.The above figures are calculated for both deposits together;in 2003, only mining took place at the Khakanjinskoye deposit, no metal was produced.4In <strong>2004</strong>, the Russian inflation rate was 11.7%, the US dollar grew 5.6% compared to the ruble exchange rate; theaverage annual London PM Fix price for gold was $409.7/oz. (up 13%), and the average annual London PM Fix pricefor silver increased 37% to $6.67/oz.5See full calculations and methodology in Appendix 1The company was able to main−tain cash costs at or below theglobal average at all of its produc−tion plants. In <strong>2004</strong>, the averageglobal cash costs grew by 13%and reached $253/oz. Duringthis same period, the averagegold price grew from $363/oz. to$409/oz. It should be highlightedthat <strong>Polymetal</strong> has significantlydecreased production costs overa several year period when theglobal trend has been toward ris−ing costs.Total cash costs at the Vo−rontsovskoye deposit in <strong>2004</strong>grew by 154% (compared to2003) and reached $257/oz. Au.This significant increase in cashcosts is due to rising operatingcosts at the deposit, because ofintensive stripping and explosivework for obtaining primary ore forthe new plant. In addition, during<strong>2004</strong>, gold production declinedat the deposit. <strong>Polymetal</strong> plans toreduce its cash costs at this de−posit during the coming year.In <strong>2004</strong>, total cash costs at theKhakanjinskoye deposit totaled$201/oz. Au. Gold production be−gan in <strong>2004</strong>, and the companyplans to reach its target projectcapacity by the end of the firsthalf of 2005. At the same time,we estimate significantly loweringtotal cash costs by decreasingproduction processing costs andincreasing production efficiency(through improved recovery ratesand metal production volumes).18 <strong>Polymetal</strong> annual report <strong>2004</strong>
At the Dukat and Lunnoye depos−its − the key silver production fa−cilities of the company − total cashcosts fell to $1.77/oz. Ag, a 23%decrease compared to 2003results. At the same time, aver−age global cash costs for silverincreased by 11% and reached$2.36/oz. The impressive resultsat Dukat and Lunnoye can be at−tributed to technological innova−tions that optimized the produc−tion process and lowered metallosses during production. Basedon results from the reported pe−riod, <strong>Polymetal</strong>’s silver productionfacilities were among the mostprofitable primary silver mines inthe world.The company sees further possi−bilities to lower production costs,for example, by optimizing techno−logical processes (through mini−mizing the use of reagents) andby decreasing metal lost duringprocessing and shipping.Capital expendituresIn <strong>2004</strong>, <strong>Polymetal</strong> continued toinvest in developing its productionplants. The total value of property,plants and equipment was $256.7million, a 25.7% increase com−pared to 2003. The period from2003 to <strong>2004</strong> can be character−ized as a period of active invest−ment in construction. The valueof buildings and additional struc−tures grew 2.2 times due to thelaunch of new production plants.The number of facilities underconstruction declined as differentprojects were launched.Property, plants and equipment valuemln. $USIn 2003, the Khakanjinskoye de−posit was launched and the Dukatdeposit reached its project ca−pacity. In <strong>2004</strong>, the Dukat depositincreased its production capacity.<strong>Polymetal</strong> continued financing theCapital Expendituresfacilitiesfinal stages of construction atthe Khakanjinskoye deposit. How−ever, the greatest percentage ofcapital expenditures was devotedto the construction and launch ofStage II at the Vorontsovskoyedeposit. <strong>2004</strong> capital expendi−tures were $29.6 million (a 37%decrease compared to 2003 fig−ures) − a result of the companypassing the peak of expenditures.mln. $USLunnoyeDukatKhakanjinskoye(Stage I)Vorontsovskoye(Stage II)Capital expenditures19
- Page 1 and 2: Annual report2004St. Petrsburg1
- Page 3 and 4: Annual Report2004St. Petersburg3
- Page 5 and 6: FinancialhighlightIndicator Meas. u
- Page 7 and 8: 2004Key eventsFebruarynew managemen
- Page 9 and 10: koye gold mine. This cost increasec
- Page 11 and 12: MineralResourcesVladimir T. Ryabukh
- Page 13 and 14: Igor V. Venatovsky,First Deputy CEO
- Page 15 and 16: Sergey A. Cherkashin,CFOSalesFinanc
- Page 17: Denis G. Pavlov,Head of TreasuryDep
- Page 21 and 22: ProductionfacilitiesoverviewProduct
- Page 23 and 24: Victor R. Wulfert,Managing Director
- Page 25 and 26: Victor R. Wulfert,Managing Director
- Page 27 and 28: Andrey V. Novikov,Managing Director
- Page 29 and 30: Sergey G. Antipin,Managing Director
- Page 31 and 32: Vorontsovskoye(Northern Urals Gold,
- Page 33 and 34: Alexander V. Bulavin,Head of Licens
- Page 35 and 36: Dukat depositconducting a feasibili
- Page 37 and 38: GlobalpositioningIn 2004, world sil
- Page 39 and 40: CorporategovernancePolymetal follow
- Page 41 and 42: Hazardous facilities at the deposit
- Page 43 and 44: Personnel at mining facilitiesCompa
- Page 45 and 46: Upgrading skillsIn 2004, the compan
- Page 47 and 48: ManagementVitaly NESISCEOMr. Nesis
- Page 49 and 50: ZAOPricewaterhouseCoopers AuditSred
- Page 51 and 52: JSC “ISPA “POLYMETAL”STATEMEN
- Page 53 and 54: JSC “ISPA “POLYMETAL”CONSOLID
- Page 55 and 56: The Group’s 100% interest in avar
- Page 57 and 58: Deferred developmentexpendituresIn
- Page 59 and 60: NOTE 3Variable Interest EntityStart
- Page 61 and 62: Investments mainly represent or−d
- Page 63 and 64: Loans from NIKoil Bank in total ofU
- Page 65 and 66: Future payments under capital lease
- Page 67 and 68: Note 24Income TaxThe income tax exp
- Page 69 and 70:
In accordance with FAS 141, thecont
- Page 71 and 72:
NOTE 30Subsequent eventsBank loan r
- Page 73 and 74:
Vorontsovskoye (Northern Urals Gold
- Page 75 and 76:
Dukat and Lunnoye (Magadan Silver,
- Page 77 and 78:
1) Per ounce of gold produced or so