1935 Comintern 7th Congress Part 3 Georgi Dimitrov Response.pdf

.h w ill e I' t:\Skli h e re . 0 1. Ih- I \'c~ n l \ll .. ,0 o u r :-c ,. thl1" , " , e1l:1I t il''' we s lall ". b ' sellIn,.. 'C I I~' " '' 1111I1'01(' \1111('5 ) . 11;11)0: to U' IIIO\ . prcpnrc t h e Krolln d fo r tI(' It rnry . ill " ~I , ill OIl ,,"(ll'd!' uI ,'" nt of b:lttl " I "It> orkcrs' tUI • 'I' the qllestlon til t ItS Way Ylt" ~ fore a w D tad:.,',etIlghereI I "lI" • creflted? Y peasantry , wou ( 11\ eft ......" R ble ~ IS ' . t from . ~ '\GIl 0 !>. ,"e I)roletana fie . grarian revolution, WOuldI l 'sointe " °wou ', I ' .,tl " • ,g the slog-ai,' f h l)Cople to d islllllte the prolt ..'.h 'Ithdr:l\\ ln ' (;S 0 t e . , ,l}\; \1. -ier for the enel ll · 1 the peasr.-\try III OpPOsItion tomake It en !> I .~. s antr)', and SC. d tie y-" ' , I1lrades, ".,.." is well known, was on.tarlat :lll . I 55 Yet thiS, co 'k' g clasS was defeated in th~the w o rkl~g c a · nS why the wor IIIf the 1l1aln re3S0 .o events of 19.}4' t be forgotten : 10 all countrit!October one thing must no _, Iy small in numbers, whtrtl'Iowe\'er, . omp.'lratlve 1 'he proletariat IS c t _bourgeois strata pre( om1nale,where t try and the urban pet Y d every effort to set up a firrtthe pea~~le more nccessary to b e \ elf so that it may be able toit i,~::ilfront of the work~ng ~Ia~~rl '~' itl; regard to all the toilers,link' 't place as the leading a,c the problem of the proletarl~ta -e 1 s , a\lac\-ang l'Thus comrades, 11l h can be no genera panacea sun·nd the people's fronl~ t erIe I peoples, In this matter uniHt.t ron t a . II untnes, a - II I 'blfor all cases, a co d the same recipe to a coun ntSa e . . of one an 'II ' the apphcatiOn to say so to Ign orance:; ie.sa Ism, " 11 alloW me ' bis equivalent, if you \\1 ed even when it st3lks a. out, nay,ignorance should ~e flo~g bo t in the cloak of u1llversal ttt,." I I when It stalks aU.parUc~ ar Y (APplause.)3ud-dned schemes.10T/tll R olli oj Socia /-D ctlloCFncy and itl A II it 14 de T O,,,llrd, theU"i/ccl F,tnl/ oj tll ll P,oltJta ,ial.COlliratk s, in "iew of Ihe IflCtic:l1 problems confro nting \1 5 , it, ,er)' important 10 gile fl correct reply to the question of whether~ i !l I . De\lloCrncy al Ihe pre;,cn t time is :;till the pri ncilml bulwarkf tho.: bourgeoisie, aud if so, where?o Some of the comr:_des who participated in the discussion(Col1lrades Florin , Dutt) touched upon this question, but in viewfits illlllOrt:lUcc a fulle r reply mu ~ t be given to it, for it is "Ouest ion wh ich workers o f all tre nds, particularly Social·bel\lOC r:ltic workers, are askillg' and cannot help ask ing.It llI ust be borne in mind that in a number of countries the :)Osition o f Social-Democracy in the bourgeois state , and its atti­~ude towards the bourgeoisie , h3vc becn undergoi ng :1 ch :lnge.In the first pl:'ice, the cri sis has thoroughly shaken the positionf even the 1110st secure sectio n of the working- cl:lss, the so-called:ristocraCy of labour, upon which , as we know, Social-Democracyelies for support. T his sectio n, too , i!' begi nning more and more~o revise its views :lS to t he e:>.:pedi -::ncy of the policy of classcollaboration with the bourgeoisie,Second, as I IlOil1ted out in my report, the bourgeoisie in anumber of countri es is itself compelled to abandon bourgeoisdemocracy and resort to t he terroristic form of its dictatorship,depriving Social- Democracy not only of its prcvious position inthe political system of fi nance capital, but also, under certainconditions, of its legal status, persecuting and even su ppress·ing it. .Third, under the lIlfluence of the lessons learnt from t1, .:defeat of the workers in German y , Austria and Spain, a defeatwhich waS brgely the result of the Socin.l-Democratic policy ofclass collaboration with the bou rgeoisie, :md, o n the other hand,under the influence of the victory of Socialism in the Soviet Unionas a result of Bolshevik policy :md the application of living, revolutionaryMarxism, the Social·Democratic workers are becomingrevolutionised, are beginning to tum to the class struggle againstthe bourgeoisie.The joint effect o f all this has been to make it increasinglydifficult, rind in some countries actually impossible, for Social·Democracy to preserve its form-cr role of bulwark of the, "bourgeoiSIe.Failure to understand this is particularly harmful in thosecountries in which the fascist dictatorship has deprived Social·Democracy of its legal status , From this point of view tbe sclf-11