Growing OpportunityThe Business Case‘New faces, new energyventures, are beginning<strong>to</strong> dominate the debate —and leaving the incumbentbig energy companies intheir wake on the issueof innovation aroundsustainable energy.’Colin Le Duc, GenerationInvestment Management76www.generationim.comNext, deeper divesWhatever the sec<strong>to</strong>r, global challengesmean that it’s time <strong>to</strong> s-t-r-e-t-c-h (seecoverage of X Prize Foundation, Panel 3.1).To get a better sense of how all this isplaying out, Chapters 4 and 5 take a closerlook at two key sec<strong>to</strong>rs: healthcare andenergy. Our twin aim is <strong>to</strong> deepen the divesin these sec<strong>to</strong>rs in the future — and <strong>to</strong>expand the approach <strong>to</strong> look at moresec<strong>to</strong>rs.There are striking contrasts betweenthe two sec<strong>to</strong>rs. As Acumen Fund CEO,Jacqueline Novogratz, put it, ‘Healthtends <strong>to</strong> be a more dis<strong>to</strong>rted market whenspeaking of the poor. It is highly subsidizedand largely government-driven. Thereare huge opportunities <strong>to</strong> create socialenterprises in this sec<strong>to</strong>r given thesignificant resources available, but ittakes harnessing large governmentcontracts, measuring output effectivelyand navigating often tricky political terrain.Energy, on the other hand, often overlooksthe poor entirely and so markets for thepoor are often not dis<strong>to</strong>rted, but insteadare simply out of reach for poor people.Look at solar energy as an example wheremany effective technologies exist but veryfew, if any, are truly viable at householdlevel. At the same time, there seems <strong>to</strong>be a tremendous surge of resources in<strong>to</strong>alternative energy, including for the poor.These resources still seem <strong>to</strong> be comingmore from private sources and so thisdifferentiating characteristic — wherefunds come from — is still the criticaldifferentia<strong>to</strong>r.’Most social enterprises tackling healthcarecontinue <strong>to</strong> operate as charities(i.e. foundation-funded non-profits).While highly outcome-oriented, theseorganizations — with a few notableexceptions — struggle <strong>to</strong> secure moresustainable modes of financing. Energystart-ups, at least in the developed world,tend <strong>to</strong> have the benefit of robust capitaland consumer markets for their productsand services. That said, exceptions remain,in large part among entrepreneurs focusedon bringing energy <strong>to</strong> the world’s poorest.Here, <strong>to</strong>o, however, promising examplesare emerging, such as Orb Energy,a venture-capital-backed enterpriseselling inexpensive solar systems <strong>to</strong>Indian cus<strong>to</strong>mers, ranging from farmers<strong>to</strong> technology companies. Interestingly,much of the business was previouslypart of Shell India’s renewables business,but was spun out.28As background <strong>to</strong> our analysis of the worldsof social and environmental entrepreneurship,we talked <strong>to</strong> Colin Le Duc, Headof Research at Generation InvestmentManagement, 76 and itself a form of socialenterprise, about the differences betweenthe energy and healthcare sec<strong>to</strong>rs. Henoted that they ‘see a huge amount ofinnovation in both sec<strong>to</strong>rs, from the fullrange of companies — large public <strong>to</strong>small cap <strong>to</strong> private. And globally, <strong>to</strong>o.’On healthcare, he stressed that, ‘biotech iswhere all the innovation is. We see a hugeamount of interest in DNA and genomicsgenerally. Plus, we see a major trend aroundthe cross-over between health, food, andenergy. The trade offs in biofuels — i.e.land for food or land for energy — are welldocumented, but we also see innovationaround nutraceuticals and new geneticmaterials. In addition, we track companieslike CIPLA in India, who are innovatingaround new HIV drug delivery systems.And Novo Nordisk’s work around diabetescontinues <strong>to</strong> be stunning, <strong>to</strong>o.’ This viewfrom the emerging mainstream illustratesthe difficulty faced by social entrepreneursin the field, because their ventures andpredicted returns (where they exist) fallfar below the radar of even the mostprogressive of inves<strong>to</strong>rs.On the energy front, he noted that,‘The cleantech boom of recent yearsis manifesting in various ways: largecorporates are buying an unprecedentednumber of private cleantech companies.For example, in 2005 alone Danaherbought 78 cleantech companies. I believethe same dynamic that has happenedin the Big Pharma sec<strong>to</strong>r - where allthe innovation is coming from biotechcompanies and Big Pharma gets everless return on its R&D spending — is alsonow happening in Energy. New faces,new energy ventures, are beginning <strong>to</strong>dominate the debate — and leaving theincumbent big energy companies in theirwake on the issue of innovation aroundsustainable energy.’
Growing OpportunityThe Business Case‘Revolution ThroughCompetition’X Prize Foundation77www.xprize.orgPanel 3.1Time <strong>to</strong> s-t-r-e-t-c-hA significant proportion of those wespoke <strong>to</strong> outside the fields of social andenvironmental entrepreneurship see a keyimpact of all this effort as being a usefulspotlighting of the need for all parts ofbusiness <strong>to</strong> be more innovative andentrepreneurial in meeting social,environmental and governance challenges.But for a real stretch, try the X PrizeFoundation, which really encouragesinnova<strong>to</strong>rs and entrepreneurs <strong>to</strong> thinkoutside the box. 77 They create and manageprizes that encourage innova<strong>to</strong>rs <strong>to</strong> solvesome of the greatest challenges facing theworld <strong>to</strong>day. Their mot<strong>to</strong>: ‘RevolutionThrough Competition.’ Now the Foundationis moving beyond aerospace (its originalarea of focus) <strong>to</strong> tackle some of thechallenges that social and environmentalentrepreneurs are concerned about.We asked Tom Vander Ark, the Foundation’sPresident, what lay behind this shift.First, how did the decision <strong>to</strong> move beyondaerospace happen? ‘Larry Page, Google cofounder,believes in the power of prizes andjoined after we awarded the Ansari X Prizefor space,’ Vander Ark recalled. ‘He thenencouraged the board <strong>to</strong> consider a broadermission.’ And how are the next generationpriorities being selected? ‘We’re attempting<strong>to</strong> identify the world’s biggest problems,particularly those susceptible <strong>to</strong> innovationthrough competition, where it’s possible<strong>to</strong> set a difficult but achievable objective,and where it’s likely that we can secure aprize purse.’Evolving at the moment is the Au<strong>to</strong>motiveX Prize, which will encourage car designersworldwide <strong>to</strong> design, build and sell superefficientcars that — crucially — peoplewant <strong>to</strong> buy. Why?29There are at least five reasons, they say.First, ‘because 40% of world oil outputfuels the au<strong>to</strong>motive industry — and, inthe US, 65% of oil consumption is in thetransportation sec<strong>to</strong>r.’ Second, because‘au<strong>to</strong>motive emissions contributesignificantly <strong>to</strong> global climate change.’Third, because ‘there are no mainstreamconsumer choices for clean, super-efficientvehicles that meet market needs forprice, size, capability, image, safety, andperformance.’ Fourth, because theau<strong>to</strong>motive industry is stalled — legislation,regulation, labor issues, manufacturingcosts, legacy costs, franchise laws, obsoletetechnology, consumer attitudes, and manyother fac<strong>to</strong>rs have combined <strong>to</strong> blockbreakthroughs. Fifth, because ‘increases inengine efficiency have been “spent” onincreased vehicle power, acceleration, andweight, rather than on increased fueleconomy.’ And sixth, and fundamentally,‘because we believe there is grea<strong>to</strong>pportunity for technological change.’The obvious next question: is it any harder<strong>to</strong> pick suitable targets for social andenvironmental challenges? ‘Setting goalsand writing rules is hard in all cases —it’s the secret <strong>to</strong> a great prize,’ VanderArk answered. ‘The difference betweeninnovation and revolution is large scaleadoption. We attempt <strong>to</strong> create goals,rules, competitions, and public campaignsthat result in revolutionary change, notjust awards for good ideas.’Any guesses as <strong>to</strong> where all this is going<strong>to</strong> take the Foundation? ‘By next year,’ hesaid, ‘we will have launched prizes in fourareas (space, genomics/medicine,transportation/energy, and education/poverty reduction), will have full prizeteams, and well-developed shared services.By 2009, we will have developed severalrevenue engines that will make it asustainable world class prize platform.’Watch this space.