12.07.2015 Views

Keynes the Man.pdf - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

Keynes the Man.pdf - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

Keynes the Man.pdf - The Ludwig von Mises Institute

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Murray N. Rothbard 51could still retain “a wide field for <strong>the</strong> exercise of private initiativeand responsibility.” As Hazlitt puts it,Investment is a key decision in <strong>the</strong> operation of any economicsystem. And government investment is a form of socialism.Only confusion of thought, or deliberate duplicity, would denythis. For socialism, as any dictionary would tell <strong>the</strong> <strong>Keynes</strong>ians,means <strong>the</strong> ownership and control of <strong>the</strong> means of productionby government. Under <strong>the</strong> system proposed by <strong>Keynes</strong>, <strong>the</strong>government would control all investment in <strong>the</strong> means of productionand would own <strong>the</strong> part it had itself directly invested.It is at best mere muddleheadedness, <strong>the</strong>refore, to present <strong>the</strong><strong>Keynes</strong>ian nostrums as a free enterprise or “individualistic”alternative to socialism. (Hazlitt [1959] 1973, p. 388; cf. Brunner1987, pp. 30, 38)<strong>The</strong>re was a system that had become prominent and fashionablein Europe during <strong>the</strong> 1920s and 1930s that was preciselymarked by this desired <strong>Keynes</strong>ian feature: private ownership, subjectto comprehensive government control and planning. This was,of course, fascism.Where did <strong>Keynes</strong> stand on overt fascism? From <strong>the</strong> scatteredinformation now available, it should come as no surprise that<strong>Keynes</strong> was an enthusiastic advocate of <strong>the</strong> “enterprising spirit”of Sir Oswald Mosley, <strong>the</strong> founder and leader of British fascism,in calling for a comprehensive “national economic plan” in late1930. By 1933, Virginia Woolf was writing to a close friend thatshe feared <strong>Keynes</strong> was in <strong>the</strong> process of converting her to “a formof fascism.” In <strong>the</strong> same year, in calling for national self-sufficiencythrough state control, <strong>Keynes</strong> opined that “Mussolini, perhaps,is acquiring wisdom teeth” (<strong>Keynes</strong> 1930b, 1933, p. 766; Johnsonand Johnson 1978, p. 22; on <strong>the</strong> relationship between <strong>Keynes</strong> andMosley, see Skidelsky 1975, pp. 241, 305–6; Mosley 1968, pp. 178,207, 237–38, 253; Cross 1963, pp. 35–36).But <strong>the</strong> most convincing evidence of <strong>Keynes</strong>’s strong fascistbent was <strong>the</strong> special foreword he prepared for <strong>the</strong> German editionof <strong>The</strong> General <strong>The</strong>ory. This German translation, published in late

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!