12.07.2015 Views

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Receiving Gravitational Waves 241too — particularly the requirement for the very precise control <strong>of</strong>the wavelength <strong>of</strong> the laser <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> the lengths <strong>of</strong> the cavities. Indeedwith long cavities <strong>of</strong> the high finesse desirable here exceptionalshort-term wavelength stability is required from the laser.The heart <strong>of</strong> the difficulty is that, unlike a delay line, a Fabry-Perotcavity stores light because it is in itself an interferometer — the trapping <strong>of</strong>the light for many round trips comes about only by careful adjustment <strong>of</strong> thephases <strong>of</strong> the superposed beams. This can only occur when the wavelength<strong>of</strong> the light <strong>and</strong> the length <strong>of</strong> the cavity are in resonance, that is matched sothat an integer number <strong>of</strong> waves fits into the cavity. Very near the resonancecondition, the phase <strong>of</strong> the output light varies with mirror separation in thesame way as the light that has traveled through a delay line. To achievethis condition, the light <strong>and</strong> the arm have to be locked together by a servosystem. Drever’s lecture goes on to describe the style <strong>of</strong> servo required,one that he <strong>and</strong> his group developed in conjunction with John Hall’s groupat the Joint Institute for Laboratory Astrophysics in Boulder, Colorado. 18This servo design has its roots in an analogous microwave device developedby Robert Pound. 19While the essence <strong>of</strong> the difficulty was thus solved, in practice the use<strong>of</strong> Fabry-Perot cavities has additional complications. One is due to the factthat when a cavity is not very close to resonance, the phase <strong>of</strong> the outputlight has almost no dependence at all on the separation <strong>of</strong> the mirrors,thus making it very hard to generate the sort <strong>of</strong> signal necessary to acquirethe lock on resonance in the first place. An additional level <strong>of</strong> complicationcomes when the arm cavities are assembled into a complete Michelsoninterferometer, since the interferometers within the interferometer need tobe separately controlled without degrading the function <strong>of</strong> the main instrument.Solving these sorts <strong>of</strong> problems robustly proved to be challengingwork. That it now has been done successfully in LIGO is a great engineeringtriumph.Drever goes on to show another important improvement in sensitivitythat can be achieved with Fabry-Perot technology. It starts from recognizingan opportunity in operating the interferometer so that, in the absence<strong>of</strong> a gravitational wave, no light exits the interferometer toward the outputphotodetector; instead, all <strong>of</strong> the light returns toward the laser. Weiss hadproposed this operating point as a way <strong>of</strong> minimizing excess noise in theinterferometer readout. Drever’s insight was that, given the ultra-low levels<strong>of</strong> absorption then becoming available in mirror coatings, the power in that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!