12.07.2015 Views

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Gravity, Geometry <strong>and</strong> the Quantum 357Now, most <strong>of</strong> the techniques used in the familiar, Minkowskian quantumtheories are deeply rooted in the availability <strong>of</strong> a flat back-groundmetric. In particular, it is this structure that enables one to single out thevacuum state, perform Fourier transforms to decompose fields canonicallyinto creation <strong>and</strong> annihilation parts, define masses <strong>and</strong> spins <strong>of</strong> particles <strong>and</strong>carry out regularizations <strong>of</strong> products <strong>of</strong> operators. Already when one passesto quantum field theory in curved space-times, extra work is needed toconstruct mathematical structures that can adequately capture underlyingphysics (see Ford’s article in this volume). In our case, the situation is muchmore drastic 12 : there is no background metric whatsoever! Therefore newphysical ideas <strong>and</strong> mathematical tools are now necessary. Fortunately, theywere constructed by a number <strong>of</strong> researchers in the mid-nineties <strong>and</strong> havegiven rise to a detailed quantum theory <strong>of</strong> Riemannian geometry. 24,25,38Because the situation is conceptually so novel <strong>and</strong> because there areno direct experiments to guide us, reliable results require a high degree <strong>of</strong>mathematical precision to ensure that there are no hidden infinities. Achievingthis precision has been a priority in the program. Thus, while one isinevitably motivated by heuristic, physical ideas <strong>and</strong> formal manipulations,generally the final results are mathematically rigorous. In particular, duecare is taken in constructing function spaces, defining measures <strong>and</strong> functionalintegrals, regularizing products <strong>of</strong> field operators, <strong>and</strong> calculatingeigenvectors <strong>and</strong> eigenvalues <strong>of</strong> geometric operators. Consequently, the finalresults are all free <strong>of</strong> divergences, well-defined, <strong>and</strong> respect the backgroundindependence (diffeomorphism invariance).Let us now turn to specifics. For simplicity, I will focus on the gravitationalfield; matter couplings are discussed in references [11,13,25,38].The basic gravitational configuration variable is an SU(2)-connection, A i aon a 3-manifold M representing ‘space’. As in gauge theories, the momentaare the ‘electric fields’ Ei a.d However, in the present gravitationalcontext, they also acquire a space-time meaning: they can be naturallyinterpreted as orthonormal triads (with density weight 1) <strong>and</strong> determinethe dynamical, Riemannian geometry <strong>of</strong> M. Thus, in contrast to Wheeler’sgeometrodynamics 2,3,4 , the Riemannian structures, including the positivedefinitemetric on M, is now built from momentum variables.The basic kinematic objects are: i) holonomies h e (A) <strong>of</strong> A i a , which dictatehow spinors are parallel transported along curves or edges e; <strong>and</strong>d Throughout, indices a, b, .. will refer to the tangent space <strong>of</strong> M while the ‘internal’indices i, j, ... will refer to the Lie algebra <strong>of</strong> SU(2).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!