12.07.2015 Views

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

496 R. Penrosecorresponding notion should be for a “power series” in ∂/∂Z α .It would appear to be probable that some insights into the appropriate“quantum twistor geometry” are to be obtained from the procedures <strong>of</strong>non-commutative geometry hh applied to the original twistor space T, sincehere we have basic “coordinates” Z α <strong>and</strong> ¯Z α which do not commute, thesebehaving formally like Z α <strong>and</strong> −∂/∂Z α I am not aware <strong>of</strong> any detailedwork in this direction, however. In the absence <strong>of</strong> this, I wish to makesome pertinent comments that seem to address this kind <strong>of</strong> issue from asomewhat different angle.There is at least one way in which the replacements¯Z α − ∂∂Z α<strong>and</strong>∂∂¯Z α Z αdo find a clear mathematical representation in important twistor expressions.This is in the (positive definite) Hermitian scalar product 〈f|g〉 betweenpositive-frequency twistor functions (1st cohomology elements) f <strong>and</strong>g, each <strong>of</strong> a given homogeneity degree r. Let us choose another such twistorfunction h, but now <strong>of</strong> homogeneity r − 1. Then we find the relations〈 ∂f∂Z α |h〉 = −〈f|Zα h〉 ,〈Z α h|f〉 = −〈h| ∂f∂Z α 〉 ,which is consistent with the above replacements, where we must bearin mind that the quantities in the “〈. . . |” actually appear in complexconjugateform <strong>and</strong> that in the first <strong>of</strong> these relations a minus sign comesabout when the action <strong>of</strong> “∂/∂¯Z α ” is transferred from leftward to rightward.To see how to ensure that these relations are satisfied, we need thegeneral form <strong>of</strong> the scalar product, but where (for the moment) I restrictattention to cases for which r > −4. We find that this scalar product takesthe form∮〈f|g〉 = c ¯f(W α )[W α Z α ] −r−4 g(Z α )d 4 W ∧ d 4 Zwhere c is some constant, independent <strong>of</strong> r, where d 4 W = 1 24 εαβρσ dW α ∧dW β ∧ dW β ∧ dW β <strong>and</strong> correspondingly for d 4 Z (which is the 4-form φabove), <strong>and</strong> where (with n > 0)so that[x] −1 = x −1[x] −n = −(−x) −n (n − 1)!<strong>and</strong>d[x] −ndx= [x] −n−1 .

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!