12.07.2015 Views

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

100 Years of Relativity Space-Time Structure: Einstein and Beyond ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Development <strong>of</strong> the Concepts <strong>of</strong> <strong>Space</strong>, <strong>Time</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Space</strong>-<strong>Time</strong> 19And although a time <strong>and</strong> a line are [mutually] incomparable inquantity, still there is no ratio found as existing between time <strong>and</strong>time, which is not found among lines, <strong>and</strong> vice versa. (A Treatiseon the Configuration <strong>of</strong> Qualities <strong>and</strong> Motions).It was not until 1698 that Pierre Varignon combined spatial <strong>and</strong> temporalintervals in a single diagram. He commented:<strong>Space</strong> <strong>and</strong> time being heterogeneous magnitudes, it is not reallythem that are compared together in the relation called velocity,but only the homogeneous magnitudes that express them, which are. . . either two lines or two numbers, or any two other homogeneousmagnitudes that one wishes (Mémoire <strong>of</strong> 6 July 1707).Forty years later, Jean le Rond D’Alembert was even more explicit:One cannot compare together two things <strong>of</strong> a different nature, suchas space <strong>and</strong> time; but one can compare the relation <strong>of</strong> two portions<strong>of</strong> time with that <strong>of</strong> the parts <strong>of</strong> space traversed. . . . One mayimagine a curve, the abcissae <strong>of</strong> which represent the portions <strong>of</strong>time elapsed since the beginning <strong>of</strong> the motion, the correspondingordinates designating the corresponding spaces traversed duringthese temporal portions: the equation <strong>of</strong> this curve expresses, notthe relation between times <strong>and</strong> spaces, but if one may so put it,the relation <strong>of</strong> relation that the portions <strong>of</strong> time have to their unitto that which the portions <strong>of</strong> space traversed have to theirs (Traitédu dynamique, 1743).The only twentieth-century mathematician I have found who emphasizesthe dimensional nature <strong>of</strong> physical quantities is J. A. Schouten, the eminentdifferential geometer. In Ref. 8, he distinguished between geometrical <strong>and</strong>physical quantities, pointing out (p. 126) that:quantities in physics have a property that geometrical quantitiesdo not. Their components change not only with transformations <strong>of</strong>coordinates but also with transformations <strong>of</strong> certain units.Constantly bearing in mind this difference between mathematical <strong>and</strong> physicalquantities can help avoid the fetishism <strong>of</strong> mathematics.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!