12.07.2015 Views

Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Core</strong> <strong>Avionics</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Program management and operational employment successes achieved with theARC-210 radio and other common solutions can be emulated across other coreproducts. In early phases of system design or modification efforts, PMs should assesspotential benefits and risks of developing a new system against tailored application of aknown solution. Unique solutions may appear more attractive in the near term becausethey usually have fewer dependencies and allow more direct control of resources.However, unique solutions can also present significant modernization and sustainmentchallenges over the remaining life cycle when they have to be independently funded.There are compelling cases when a unique solution is appropriate. Justifications fordecisions to proceed with unique solutions should be formally recorded for MilestoneDecision Authority (MDA) approval in Acquisition Strategy (AS) and Acquisition ProgramBaseline (APB) documents.2. Leverage established solution development momentum, maturity orlessons learned. Coordinate deliberate convergence toward common products orfamilies of systems. The DoD 5000 series directs that Doctrine, Organization,Training, Materiel, Leadership, Personnel, and Facilities (DOTMLPF) reviews will beconducted to determine if a capability gap can be addressed without a materiel solution.When a materiel solution is called for, it then directs that Commercial Off the Shelf(COTS) solutions be explored first. Similarly, existing military solutions should bereviewed for applicability before pursuing a new solution.Benefits achieved with necking down <strong>Navy</strong> helicopter TMS came not only fromeliminating several unique airframe sustainment infrastructures, but also from reductionof unique component sustainment infrastructures. The cost avoidances achieved bydeliberately converging down to a common baseline airframe freed resources to enablemore system-enabled capability integration. Additionally, even though the two remainingvariants have different mission sets, they were purposefully designed to achieveefficiencies from commonality in their core avionics systems.<strong>Navy</strong> Helicopter TMS neck-down efficiencies.<strong>Core</strong> Section CAMP 2011 10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!