12.07.2015 Views

Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

Core Avionics Master Plan - NAVAIR - U.S. Navy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Core</strong> <strong>Avionics</strong> <strong>Master</strong> <strong>Plan</strong>Established program modernization upgrades and capability enhancementsshould also leverage prior efforts or established solutions whenever practicable. Theroadmaps presented in this document identify what evolutionary capability steps arealready being developed in avionics enabling systems and when they are expected tobe fielded. If the timing of those advancements can meet platform mission needs andmodification schedules, existing momentum and funding can accelerate integration.3. During program baseline assessments, use the <strong>NAVAIR</strong> CommonalityOpportunity Review Process (CORP) process to analyze alternative solutionlogistics footprints, modernization costs and sustainment life cycle impactsacross the full life cycle, and to the Enterprise rather than to the individualplatform. <strong>NAVAIR</strong>INST 5000.25 (CORP) was established to maximize cost-wiseresource allocation decisions across the NAE, as well as to promote interoperability andreduce deployment logistics footprints. CORP projects are executed by <strong>NAVAIR</strong>Program Office, Program Executive Officer (PEO) staff and Competency personnelusing standardized procedures, templates and checklists that enable business caseanalyses and analysis of alternatives based upon factual data. The process enablesquantitative assessment of common versus unique system costs and benefits over thelife cycle and across the NAE. It is intended to be applied prior to requests for fiscalresources or program initiation. The CORP Handbook identifies process details,timelines, roles and responsibilities and deliverables.4. Employ Open Systems Architecture (OSA) in hardware and softwaredesigns. Adhere to collective interoperability standards and protocols in order tocontrol future modification costs. Design future platform and evolve currentplatform processing architectures toward an Open Application Interfaceconfiguration (FACE Future Airborne Capabilities Environment) that allowssystem software to be integrated without requiring full mission profile regressiontesting.SECNAVINST 5000.2D. (para.3.4.6.1. Strategy and para.7.1.4. OpenArchitecture) states: “Naval open architecture precepts shall be applied across theNaval Enterprise as an integrated technical approach and used for all systems,including support systems, when developing an acquisition strategy.”Recent executive committee and task force analyses have identified platformarchitectural and software diversity as the most significant cost driver of Naval Aviationcapability evolution. Software code modifications for single function integration, such asMode S or Mode 5, are estimated to run into the tens of millions of dollars per platform,even if the host component was previously integrated with hooks to enable growth.Although Joint Technical Architecture (JTA) mandates are being complied with, somesystems still have proprietary code or design issues that prevent leveraging upgradesdeveloped for like systems. Truly open architecture should allow open interface withnew technology, COTS products and Non-Developmental Item (NDI) solutionsirrespective of the specific provider source. Commercial personal computing andtelecommunications products have achieved this construct with operating systemsoftware and peripheral devices. <strong>NAVAIR</strong> program management can help drive thisnecessary shift in the aviation and avionics industry.<strong>Core</strong> Section CAMP 2011 12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!