Appendix G5a â Public Comments - Coastal Protection and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Comments on Draft 2012 Louisiana Coastal Master PlanBrian Marks, PhDUniversity of ArizonaBureau of Applied Research in Anthropology (BARA)Native, resident, voter, and taxpayer in Terrebonne Parish1107 Miles StreetHouma, LA 70360
(1) Comments on project choice and budgeting in the Terrebonne basinMy comments on the CPRA’s 2012 Master Plan cover a number of topics and are based uponmy reading of the entire plan and all of its appendices, as well as attendance at a number ofpublic meetings and workshops on the plan. My statements on the plan are informed by myspending the majority of my life residing in southern Terrebonne parish as well as a decade ofprofessional work on the socio-economics of coastal communities facing major livelihood andlandscape crises in the Mississippi Delta of South Louisiana and the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.Firstly, let me speak as a Terrebonne parish resident and reiterate the advocacy of a number ofTerrebonne’s non-governmental organizations and public officials for more marsh creation,hydrologic restoration, sediment diversion, or other projects that build land and establishmultiple lines of defense in Southern Terrebonne, Eastern Terrebonne, and South Lafourche. Irefer here specifically to any or all of the following prospective projects listed in the MasterPlan’s Appendix A, pages A-21 and -22:03a.MC.03 Terrebonne Bay Rim Marsh Creation,03a.MC.05 Golden Meadow-Lake Mechant Marsh Creation,03.MC.06 Montegut Area Marsh Creation,03a.MC.08 HNC-Lake Mechant Marsh Creation,03a.MC.09 North Terrebonne Bay Marsh Creation,03a.MC.10 Dulac-Cocodrie Marsh CreationFunding sources for any or all of these projects could be drawn from unincluding the currentlyincluded Point au Fer and GIWW marsh restoration projects, removing the erroneouslycategorized‘hydrologic restoration’ HNC lock feature (considering how the parish governmentis currently constructing a barge structure that will perform the lock’s most important function,keeping storm surge from running north into Houma), and/or removing the GIWW shorelinerestoration project. These sums would make approximately $2.3 billion in the first half of theplanning period available for land building projects in South and Southeast Terrebonne withouttaking money from other planning areas or waiting decades. I also note how, despite theprotestations of CPRA planners that sediments are not available for marsh creation in SoutheastTerrebonne, Appendix B of the Plan shows that significant non-renewable offshore sedimentsand substantial renewable sediments in the HNC’s outfall exist near Terrebonne, not to mentionthe Atchafalaya with enormous quantities of renewable sediment available just to the west of theparish.(2) Environmental and budgetary scenario assumptionsTurning to areas of less immediate concern in the public debate over the plan, I have a number ofpoints to raise on the plan and its assumptions. I should begin here by saying the CPRA has donecommendable work in integrating a wide variety of data sources and modeling a maze of coastalphenomena within defensible, plausible environmental and planning scenarios utilizing peerreviewedscience and the Planning Tool which allows for the project prioritization and goalsettingwork this plan achieves. My critiques are focused not on the ecological, engineering, and
Page 2 and 3: Print Preview : Public Comment Form
Page 4 and 5: Re: Public Commenthttps://webmail.l
Page 6 and 7: HARD COPY OF MASTER PLANhttps://web
Page 9 and 10: FW: Louisiana 2012 Coastal Master P
Page 21 and 22: Thank you for the opportunity to co
Page 23: Conclusionthe Corps recently announ
Page 26 and 27: Untitled Messagehttps://webmail.la.
Page 30 and 31: geological aspects of the plan or i
Page 32 and 33: 2005 and 2008. This figure should b
Page 34 and 35: However, I am disappointed that the
Page 40: Jan 22, 2012Coastal Protection and
Page 47 and 48: Question concerning land restoratio
Page 59 and 60: sediment diversion planhttps://webm
Page 63: Jan 22, 2012Coastal Protection and
Page 67 and 68: projects selected and implemented i
Page 70 and 71: info.https://webmail.la.gov/owa/?ae
Page 73 and 74: Karim BelhadjaliCoastal ResourcesSc
Page 75 and 76: Third Delta Phase II Reconnaissance
Page 77 and 78: CLIMATE CHANGE MEANS INCREASING SEA
Page 79 and 80:
Although we understand concerns wit
Page 81 and 82:
ut most recently vehicular access b
Page 83 and 84:
the SMP acknowledges the high proba
Page 85 and 86:
inclusion for their large role in b
Page 87 and 88:
incorporated into all petrochemical
Page 89 and 90:
The SMP should work toward coordina
Page 91 and 92:
The Master Plan needs to balance pr
Page 93 and 94:
Fresh water diversion projectshttps
Page 95 and 96:
PPL22 PROJECT NOMINEE FACT SHEETJan
Page 98 and 99:
Typical IslandAverage Island = 3 Ac
Page 110 and 111:
Print Preview : Public Comment Form
Page 112:
Page 115 and 116:
CPRA Master Plan 2012 ~ Comments by
Page 117 and 118:
CPRA Master Plan 2012 ~ Comments by
Page 119 and 120:
22 February 2012Comments on Louisia
Page 121 and 122:
Louisiana Environmental Action Netw
Page 128 and 129:
16241 East Main Street, Suite B10
Page 130 and 131:
LAFOURCHEPARISH~w~ ·~- ~.---------
Page 132 and 133:
Louisiana’s 2012 Coastal Master P
Page 134 and 135:
Public Commenthttps://webmail.la.go
Page 136 and 137:
February 24, 2012Coastal Protection
Page 138 and 139:
protection of population centers in
Page 140 and 141:
Conclusion: A major strength of the
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144:
Page 151 and 152:
New Contact from Louisiana Coastal
Page 153 and 154:
Fw: Lower Plaquemines Parish, La Ma
Page 155 and 156:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Mr. William RhinehartFebruary 23, 2
Page 172 and 173:
Executive CommitteeVic BlanchardPre
Page 174 and 175:
Thetis CusimanoPresident337.962.695
Page 176 and 177:
SLFPA Overview Presentationhttps://
Page 178 and 179:
necessary funding will come from ex
Page 180 and 181:
Figure 1: Risk Reduction (Top) & La
Page 187 and 188:
Melanie SaucierFrom:Joan&Bill Herke
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191:
St. Martin Parish- Beneficial use o
Page 198 and 199:
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) is
Page 200 and 201:
equired to adopt a uniform MLUP. If
Page 202 and 203:
adequately modeled to determine the
Page 204:
Fresh water diversion.........https
Page 210 and 211:
Page 212 and 213:
vermillion corp coastal restoration
Page 214:
2/25/2012 Print Preview : Public Co
Page 221:
The North Lafourche Conservation,Le
Page 226 and 227:
Comments on Louisiana’s Comprehen
Page 228 and 229:
Page 230 and 231:
Page 232 and 233:
Page 234 and 235:
THE LEAGUEOF WOMEN VOTERSOF ST. TAM
Page 236:
Master Planhttps://webmail.la.gov/o
Page 240 and 241:
educing the risk to those valued el
Page 242 and 243:
to achieve risk reduction inherentl
Page 244 and 245:
Submission of Comments on the 2012
Page 246 and 247:
Submission of Comments on the 2012
Page 270 and 271:
Coastal Protection and Restoration
Page 272 and 273:
Page 274 and 275:
ayou binevenuehttps://webmail.la.go
Page 276 and 277:
Page 278 and 279:
Page 280 and 281:
Sean Gravolet29 Oriole St.New Orlea
Page 282 and 283:
SHELL PIPELINEhttps://webmail.la.go
Page 286 and 287:
RE: Louisiana 2012 Coastal Master P
Page 288 and 289:
RE: Louisiana 2012 Coastal Master P
Page 290 and 291:
Page 292 and 293:
Page 294 and 295:
Page 296:
Page 299 and 300:
million dollars to improve the oyst
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303:
Page 307 and 308:
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
GOAL 2.TO EDUCATE THE PUBLIC THROUG
Page 313 and 314:
State of LA Master Plan 2012 Hearin
Page 315 and 316:
2012 Master Planhttps://webmail.la.
Page 317 and 318:
Page 319 and 320:
Page 321 and 322:
Appendix A in master planhttps://we
Page 323 and 324:
Page 325 and 326:
Page 327 and 328:
September 2, 2011Thomas Thompson217
Page 329:
f) Another misconception that contr
Page 332 and 333:
The Master Plan is silent on the st
Page 334 and 335:
Page 336 and 337:
Page 338 and 339:
NEW PROJECTShttps://webmail.la.gov/
Page 340 and 341:
Page 342 and 343:
Atchafalaya BasinkeeperDean A. Wils
Page 344 and 345:
Page 346 and 347:
Page 348 and 349:
Page 351 and 352:
Page 353 and 354:
impacts will occur by continuing th
Page 355 and 356:
The safety factor for levees should
Page 357 and 358:
Coastal Forests:"Our modeling indic
Page 359 and 360:
Sea Level Rise:The CPRA Technical R
Page 361 and 362:
References:DeMarco, K., J. Mouton a
Page 363 and 364:
Page 365 and 366:
Page 367 and 368:
Page 369 and 370:
Maphttps://webmail.la.gov/owa/?ae=I
Page 371 and 372:
Post Office Box 1105. Larose, La. 7
Page 373 and 374:
Melanie SaucierFrom:Sent:To:Subject
Page 375:
Page 378 and 379:
Page 380 and 381:
Current Gap In Hurricane Master Pla
Page 408 and 409:
Page 410 and 411:
Page 422 and 423:
Page 424 and 425:
Page 426 and 427:
BISCO COMMENTS TO LOUISIANA 2012 MA
Page 428 and 429:
groups. There are five state-recogn
Page 430 and 431:
Restore the Coast, Reduce Risk, Eng
Page 432 and 433:
Page 434 and 435:
Page 447 and 448:
Vermilion Parish Resilience Planhtt
Page 449:
Page 461 and 462:
Coastal master plan for plaquemines
Page 463:
Melanie SaucierFrom:Sent:To:Cc:Subj
Page 473 and 474:
RE: Draft 2012 Coastal Master Plan
Page 475:
Gulf fishing families supply over 3
show all

Appendix G5a â Public Comments - Coastal Protection and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

Appendix G5a â Public Comments - Coastal Protection and ...