Biography of Alvaro de Benavente OSA, China mis- sionary, Bishop ...
Biography of Alvaro de Benavente OSA, China mis- sionary, Bishop ...
Biography of Alvaro de Benavente OSA, China mis- sionary, Bishop ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Copyright c○ by Stochastikon GmbH (http://encyclopedia.stochastikon.com) 2<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essional Career:<br />
In 1680, <strong>Benavente</strong> arrived together with his confrere Nicolás <strong>de</strong> Ribera<br />
(1642-1711) in <strong>China</strong> and became the foun<strong>de</strong>r <strong>of</strong> the <strong>China</strong> <strong>mis</strong>sion <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Augustians. In the same year he was sent as Procurator <strong>of</strong> the Augustinians<br />
on the Philippines to Rome and Madrid on behalf <strong>of</strong> the Chinese Rites. He<br />
returned to the Philippines, where he stayed from 1690 till 1699, in 1695<br />
he was ma<strong>de</strong> provincial. Still during his stay on the Philippines <strong>Benavente</strong><br />
was appointed <strong>Bishop</strong> Titular <strong>of</strong> Ascalon by the Propaganda Fi<strong>de</strong> on 20th<br />
<strong>of</strong> October 1696, an on 22nd <strong>of</strong> October 1696 Vicar Apostolic <strong>of</strong> the Chinese<br />
province Jiangxi.<br />
<strong>Benavente</strong> arrived in <strong>China</strong> on January 1, 1700. He worked then for several<br />
years in Nanchang in the province <strong>of</strong> Jiangxi/<strong>China</strong>. Like most Augustians,<br />
also <strong>Benavente</strong> was an adherent <strong>of</strong> the method <strong>of</strong> accommodation <strong>of</strong> the Jesuits<br />
and therefore stood on their si<strong>de</strong> in the Rites Controversy. Especially he<br />
did not like that Charles Maigrot MEP (1652-1730) alone had started again<br />
the controversy with his Mandate <strong>of</strong> 1693, without consulting the other bishops<br />
and Vicars Apostolic in <strong>China</strong>. Maigrot had a.o. forbid<strong>de</strong>n all Chinese<br />
names for God without Tianzhu and he forba<strong>de</strong> that the Chinese Christians<br />
took part at the Rites for the ancestors and for Confucius. Therefore there<br />
was a meeting <strong>of</strong> the three Vicars Apostolic in April or May 1700: <strong>Benavente</strong>,<br />
Artus <strong>de</strong> Lionne MEP (1655-1713), Vicar Apostolic <strong>of</strong> Sichuan, and Basilio<br />
Brollo da Gemona OFM (1648-1704), Vicar Apostolic <strong>of</strong> Shaanxi. They met<br />
in Nanjing where <strong>Benavente</strong> stayed because he was consecrated there as a<br />
bishop, and they ma<strong>de</strong> spoke about how to <strong>de</strong>al with the question <strong>of</strong> the<br />
Rites. De Lionne, an adversary <strong>of</strong> accommodation and <strong>of</strong> the Rites, submitted<br />
a scripture <strong>of</strong> 92 propositions to his colleagues, which contained his objections<br />
against the Chinese religion and teachings. He wanted his colleagues<br />
to join him with their signature. Basilio Brollo approved all propositions<br />
besi<strong>de</strong>s one, whereas <strong>Benavente</strong> wanted to have half a year for consi<strong>de</strong>ration.<br />
On 28 October 1700 he said that the did no approve the propositions nor<br />
<strong>de</strong> Lionne’s attitu<strong>de</strong>. In June 1701 <strong>de</strong> Lionne and <strong>Benavente</strong> met again in<br />
Nanxiongfu/Guangdong, but came to no common conclusion.<br />
When the papal legate Charles-Thomas Maillard <strong>de</strong> Tournon (1668-1710)<br />
arrived in Canton in April 1705, <strong>Benavente</strong> as one <strong>of</strong> the Vicars Apostolic<br />
was invited by him to live with him in the house <strong>of</strong> the Augustinians there.<br />
After some days, <strong>Benavente</strong> gave his treatise on the Rites to Tournon, namely<br />
his “Analecta argumentorum...” (s. below), which was refuted by Tournon.<br />
But the emperor Kangxi, who received Tournon in three audiences, could not