M. Castagnetti, W. Rigamontiwhereas ureteric stones require fluoroscopic focusing.Number of shock waves should be individualized accordingto patient weight, and stone size and composition.Differences might also be related to the shock waves generator.Paediatric series of SWL report stone-free rates 3 monthsafter treatment between 70 and 100%. High rates havebeen reported even with big stones of 20-30 mm indiameters, staghorn stones, and stones located in thelower-pole. These cases, however, might require multipletreatment sessions.Current data suggest that systematic preo<strong>per</strong>ativeureteric stents insertion is unnecessary.After SWL, complications occur in about 20% of cases.Major complications include haematuria, steinstrasse,ureteric obstruction, and urinary tract infection with orwithout fever. Steinstasse occurs in 6 to 20% of cases.Spontaneous stone clearance is common despite thesmall ureteric diameter. Therefore, expectant managementwith close follow-up is adequate. Alpha-blockers can beadded to enhance stone clearance from the distal ureter.Haematuria and haematoma formation are exceptionalafter SWL and do not require any treatment. Urinary tractinfection may follow stone fragmentation or overlap othercomplications such as steinstasse formation.The procedure does not seem to cause any damage to thesurrounding anatomical structures, such as the ovaries,during treatment of distal ureteric stones in female patients.SWL does not seem to affect long-term renal growth,ispilateral or total glomerular filtration rate, or differentialrenal function, as evaluated by dimercaptosuccinicrenal scans. Consistently, SWL in paediatric patients doesnot seem to be associated with an increased long-termrisk of hy<strong>per</strong>tension, diabetes mellitus, renal failure, orproteinuria. Intuitively, type of SWL generator, shockwave numbers and dosage, on one side, and patient age,on the other, might affect the outcome, but data are stilltoo limited to draw conclusions about these variables.DISCUSSIONThis overview supports the principle that SWL is a viableoption in the treatment of up<strong>per</strong> urinary tract stones inchildren. SWL has a nearly 100% success rate withstones < 20 mm, not located in the lower pole, and otherthan staghorn. Although SWL has been used also inthese instances, <strong>per</strong>cutaneous nephrolithotomy has beenproposed as an alternative to increase stone-free ratesand reduce complications. This approach appears to beincreasingly reasonable with miniaturization of instrumentsand after the introduction of holmium laser technology.Nevertheless, <strong>per</strong>cutaneous nephrolithotomy isalso a more invasive approach, that does not ensure a100% stone-free rate, can be associated with significantmorbidity (20% haemorrhage), and increases hospitalstay. Similar arguments apply to the use of ureteroscopythat has been recommended by some as an alternative forureteric stones > 10 mm, but may be associated with significantcomplications such as ureteric <strong>per</strong>foration andstricture.CONCLUSIONSData from current literature warrant an attempt of treatmentof urinary stones by SWL in many cases includingvery young patients, patients with big stones or stones inlower-poles, and patients with staghorn calculi. The procedureseems to be safe.REFERENCES1. Jayanthi VR, Arnold PM, Koff SA: Strategies for managing up<strong>per</strong>tract calculi in young children. J Urol 1999; 162:1234-72. Raza A, Turna B, Smith G, et al: Pediatric urolithiasis: 15 yearsof local ex<strong>per</strong>ience with minimally invasive endourological managementof pediatric calculi. J Urol 2005; 174:682-5.3. D'Addessi A, Bongiovanni L, Racioppi M, et al: Is extracorporealshock wave lithotripsy in pediatrics a safe procedure? J Pediatr Surg2008; 43:591-6.CorrespondenceMarco Castagnetti, MDSection of Paediatric Urology, Urology UnitDepatment of Oncological and Surgical SciencesUniversity Hospital of PadovaMonoblocco OspedalieroVia Giustiniani, 2 - 35100 Padua, Italymarcocastagnetti@hotmail.com50Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2010; 82, 1
PRESENTATIONPercutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) in children:Ex<strong>per</strong>ience of Parma.Antonio Frattini 1 , Stefania Ferretti 1 , Antonio Salvaggio 21 O.U. Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of Parma, Italy;2 O.U. Urology, Ospedale Sacco, Milano, Italy<strong>Summary</strong>19 Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy procedures were done in 15 children aged from 8months to 16 years with complex renal stones and/or extracorporeal shock wavelithotripsy refractory stones. The <strong>per</strong>cutaneous techniques were done with the instrumentand position (prone and supine) used in adults. 14/15 patients were stone-free(13 pts in one time, 1 pt in 2 procedures and 1 pt, with complex bilateral stones disease,in 5 endourological sessions). No relevant complications developed: 1 patient need a bloodtransfusion and 1 a temporary indwelling catheter for colic pain due to oedema. We believe thatin children the endourological approach is better than traditional open surgery or reiteratedextracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy sessions which often need anaesthesia and can not guaranteea complete clearance of the stones.KEY WORDS: Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy; Children; Supine position.Submitted 9 May 2009; Accepted 30 June 2009INTRODUCTIONPaediatric <strong>per</strong>cutaneous nephrolithotripsy is a not frequentprocedure due to the low incidence of stone diseasein this age, but the endourological procedure(ureterolithotripsy/<strong>per</strong>cutaneous approach) are consideredas the first choice for several stone diseases whenESWL is not effective or contraindicated, bearing alsoin mind that these patients are exposed to an high incidenceof lithiasic recurrences and surgical treatments.Nowadays, the improvement of mini-instruments andnew lithotripsy sources (e.g. LASER) allows a less invasiveprocedure, less X-ray exposure with an excellentstone-free rate patients.We report our ex<strong>per</strong>ience on <strong>per</strong>cutaneous procedures inpaediatric age.1 had a complete duplicity of the up<strong>per</strong> urinary tract; 1had an horsekidney, 1 was affected by spinal cord diseaseand had been previously o<strong>per</strong>ated of enterocistoplastyand bilateral ureteral reimplantations; 1 presented withnephrocalcinosis (Fanconi’s syndrome); and 2 cases afterunsuccessful extracorporeal renal lithotripsy.In 10 procedures a 14 Fr renal access was <strong>per</strong>formed,in 7 cases a 20 Fr and in 2 cases a 30 Fr, respectively. Thefirst 10 <strong>per</strong>cutaneous approaches were <strong>per</strong>formed inprone position, subsequently we changed our <strong>per</strong>cutaneoussurgical standard (4/2004) using the supine position(9), both in adult and children. In children olderthan 2 years the supine <strong>per</strong>cutaneous position allows frequentlythe contemporaneous use of flexible uretheroscopy(positioning as first step) for the selection ofMATERIAL AND METHODSFrom 2001 to June 2008, we <strong>per</strong>formed 19<strong>per</strong>cutaneous approaches in 15 pts (10female and 5 male); age-range: 8 months-16 years, with a mean age of 8,3 ± 4,9 yrs.The mean stone burden was 31 ± 10,3 mm(range: 18-45 mm) (Table 1). Two patientspresented with bilateral complex lithiasis;Table 1.Stone Distribution.Complex Lithiasis (2) Single Lithiasis (6) Multiple Lithiasis (7)2 Pielic (4) Pielic/Calix (4)(1 bilateral) UPJ (2) Pielic/Calix/Ureteral (3)Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2010; 82, 151
- Page 2 and 3:
Official Journal of the SIEUN, the
- Page 4 and 5: ContentsHistological evaluation of
- Page 7 and 8: R. Leonardi, R. Caltabiano, S. Lanz
- Page 9 and 10: R. Leonardi, R. Caltabiano, S. Lanz
- Page 11 and 12: F. Galasso, R. Giannella, P. Bruni,
- Page 13 and 14: F. Galasso, R. Giannella, P. Bruni,
- Page 15 and 16: ORIGINAL PAPERSurgery for renal cel
- Page 17 and 18: S.D. Dyakov, G. Lucarelli, A.I. Hin
- Page 19 and 20: S.D. Dyakov, G. Lucarelli, A.I. Hin
- Page 21 and 22: M. Aza, S.S. Iqbal, M.V. Muhammad,
- Page 23 and 24: Archivio Italiano di Urologia e And
- Page 25 and 26: The Clavien classification system t
- Page 27 and 28: PRESENTATIONPercutaneous nephrolith
- Page 29 and 30: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An ex
- Page 31 and 32: PCNL in ItalyTable 1.Number and hos
- Page 33 and 34: PCNL in ItalyFigure 3.Comparison be
- Page 35 and 36: The patient position for PNL: Does
- Page 37 and 38: PCNL: Tips and tricks in targeting,
- Page 39 and 40: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithoto
- Page 41 and 42: PRESENTATIONHigh burden and complex
- Page 43 and 44: High burden and complex renal calcu
- Page 45 and 46: PRESENTATIONEndoscopic combined int
- Page 47 and 48: PRESENTATIONHigh burden stones: The
- Page 49 and 50: PRESENTATIONStone treatment in chil
- Page 51 and 52: Stone treatment in children: Where
- Page 53: PRESENTATIONExtracorporeal shock wa
- Page 57 and 58: PRESENTATIONFlexible ureteroscopy f
- Page 59 and 60: Flexible ureteroscopy for kidney st
- Page 61 and 62: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 63 and 64: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 65 and 66: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 67 and 68: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 69 and 70: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery
- Page 71 and 72: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery
- Page 73 and 74: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery
- Page 75: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery