A. Frattini, S. Ferretti, A. Salvaggiothe right calyx for the <strong>per</strong>cutaneouspuncture (Endovision° procedure).The direct control of needle’s <strong>per</strong>forationof renal papilla confirmsor excludes the correct biplanarx-ray guidance and allows also ashorter X-ray exposure time duringthe construction of the <strong>per</strong>cutaneousnephrostomy access. In7/9 patients an Endovision° procedurewas successfully carriedon. LASER and ballistic probeswere used for lithotripsy. In 6cases a 12 Fr nephrostomydrainage was left in place at theend of the procedure, in 7patients a 16 Fr and in 2 patientsa 20 Fr, respectively. In 4 cases we <strong>per</strong>formed a tublessprocedure.RESULT14/15 patients were stone-free (13 pts in one time, 1 pt in2 procedures and 1 pt, with complete bilateral stones disease,in 5 endourological essions). Stone compositionwas: phosphate ammonium and magnesium in 2 cases,oxalate in 8, phosphate in 4 and phosphate-oxalate in 1patient (Figure 1). Generally, the ureteral mono-J wasremoved 24 hours poste<strong>per</strong>atively and the nephrostomytube after an average of 4,7 ± 2,7 days (range: 2-11 days).Complications were: 1 prolonged haematuria from thenephrostomy tube needing a blood transfusion, 4 casesof fever, in 1 case pain secondary to oedema of theureteral meatus that requested the application of anureteral stent.n. patients (15)Phos/Am/MgFigure 1.Stone composition.OxalateStone CompositionPhosphateOx/PhospDISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONIn adults as in children, the supine position carries severaladvantages: optimal decubitus can be assumed by theawake patient by himself, no risk of traumatisms due tobed-position (standard prone procedure); no thoraciccompression, reduced colon <strong>per</strong>foration risk; contemporaryantegrade and retrograde access to the urinary tract.Retrograde ureteroscopy and antegrade <strong>per</strong>cutaneousnephroscopy with rigid and flexible instruments (1),make clearance of stone fragments easier, even in very difficultcases and reduce also the necessity of multiple renalaccesses and secondary procedures (e.g. extracorporeallithotripsy on residual fragments). During LASERlithotripsy, the irrigation through the ureteral way allowsthe clearing of the stone fragments for gravity through thenephrostomy and maintains low intrarenal pressures duringsurgical time. When it’s possible tubless procedure ispreferred for less discomfort in posto<strong>per</strong>ative time.It’s important to consider that in children even a minorblood loss could be engaging. Nevertheless, we believethat <strong>per</strong>cutaneous nephrolithotripsy in paediatric age, ifcorrectly <strong>per</strong>formed, is a safe, effective and feasible procedure(2). And it is less invasive compared to open surgery(3).Our take home message is that we believe that theendourological approach is better than traditional opensurgery or reiterated extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsysessions which often need anaesthesia and can notguarantee a complete clearance of the stones.REFERENCES1. Frattini A, Ferretti S, Salsi PE, et al. Mini<strong>per</strong>cutaneous procedure(MIPP): a new set. Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2007;79-3(suppl. 1):43-46.2. Hogan MJ, Coley BD, Jayanthi VR, et al. PercutaneousNephrostomy in Children and Adolescents: OutpatientManagement. Radiology. 2001; 218:207-210.3. Ozden E, Sahin A, Tan B, et al. Percutaneous renal surgery inchildren with complex stones. J Pediatr Urol, 2008; 4:295-98.CorrespondenceAntonio Frattini, MDO.U. Urology - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of ParmaVia Gramsci 14 - 43100 Parma, ItalyStefania Ferretti, MDO.U. Urology - Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria of ParmaVia Gramsci 14, 43100 Parma, ItalyAntonio Salvaggio, MDO.U. Urology - Ospedale SaccoVia G.B. Grassi 74 - 20157 Milano, Italy52Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2010; 82, 1
PRESENTATIONFlexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones in children.Lorenzo Defidio, Mauro De DominicisU.O.C. di Urologia Endoscopica e “Stone Center”, Ospedale Cristo Re, Roma, Italy<strong>Summary</strong>Endoscopic evaluation and management of different pathological conditions involvingthe up<strong>per</strong> urinary tract using rigid or flexible endoscopes, is now readily feasible andhas been shown to be safe and efficacious even in the smallest children.Paediatricureteroscopic procedures are similar to their adult counterparts, so that basic endoscopicprinciples should be observed.Aims of the management should be complete clearance of stones, preservation of renal functionand prevention of stone recurrence.In order to select the most appropriate surgical treatment, location, composition, and size of thestone(s), the anatomy of the collecting system, and the presence of obstruction along with thepresence of infection of the urinary tract should be considered.Although extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) is still the most important procedurefor treating urinary stones, advances in flexible endoscopes, intracorporeal lithotripsy, andextraction instruments have led to a shift in the range of indications.According to the location of the stone the treatment can be done with the rigid or flexibleureteroscope.To obtain stone fragments is essential for biochemical analysis. The stone composition may givesignificant information to prevent the high rate of recurrence, with dietary modification andspecific therapy.Successful outcomes for the retrograde treatment of renal calculi are similar to the onesobtained in the adult population (stone free rate 91-98%).The retrograde semirigid and flexible ureteropyeloscopy, using a small calibre ureteroscope, area valuable technique for kidney stones treatment in children. With excellent technique andmeticulous attention to details, the significant complications are rare.KEY WORDS: Urinary calculi; Flexible ureteroscopy; Children.Submitted 9 May 2009; Accepted 30 June 2009Endoscopic evaluation and management of the differentpathological conditions involving the up<strong>per</strong> urinary tractusing rigid or flexible endoscopes, are now readily feasibleand has been shown to be safe and efficacious evenin the smallest children.Reduction in size of the endoscopes, improvements inelectronic imaging systems, proliferation of ancillaryequipment and improvement in endourologic skillsamong paediatric urologists make endoscopic treatmentof paediatric urolithiasis the treatment of choice.Paediatric ureteroscopic procedures are similar to theiradult counterparts, so that basic endoscopic principlesshould be observed (1).Nevertheless, children pose specific technical challengesthat require accurate planning before endoscopy and thataffect the risks and outcomes of these procedures.Aims of the management should be complete clearanceof stones, preservation of renal function and preventionof stone recurrence. In paediatric patients with urinarystones, metabolic abnormalities conditions have beendemonstrated in up to 50% of cases whereas a variety ofanatomic anomalies have been found in about 30% ofchildren with urolithiasis. For this reason in addition tostone removal procedures, treatment of paediatricurolithiasis requires a thorough metabolic and urologicalevaluation on an individual basis (2).In order to select the most appropriate surgical treatment,location, composition, and size of the stone(s), theanatomy of the collecting system, and the presence ofobstruction along with the presence of infection of theurinary tract should be considered.Improvements in technology and growing ex<strong>per</strong>iencehave resulted in greater acceptance of minimally invasivetechniques for the management of paediatric stones andArchivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia 2010; 82, 153
- Page 2 and 3:
Official Journal of the SIEUN, the
- Page 4 and 5:
ContentsHistological evaluation of
- Page 7 and 8: R. Leonardi, R. Caltabiano, S. Lanz
- Page 9 and 10: R. Leonardi, R. Caltabiano, S. Lanz
- Page 11 and 12: F. Galasso, R. Giannella, P. Bruni,
- Page 13 and 14: F. Galasso, R. Giannella, P. Bruni,
- Page 15 and 16: ORIGINAL PAPERSurgery for renal cel
- Page 17 and 18: S.D. Dyakov, G. Lucarelli, A.I. Hin
- Page 19 and 20: S.D. Dyakov, G. Lucarelli, A.I. Hin
- Page 21 and 22: M. Aza, S.S. Iqbal, M.V. Muhammad,
- Page 23 and 24: Archivio Italiano di Urologia e And
- Page 25 and 26: The Clavien classification system t
- Page 27 and 28: PRESENTATIONPercutaneous nephrolith
- Page 29 and 30: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: An ex
- Page 31 and 32: PCNL in ItalyTable 1.Number and hos
- Page 33 and 34: PCNL in ItalyFigure 3.Comparison be
- Page 35 and 36: The patient position for PNL: Does
- Page 37 and 38: PCNL: Tips and tricks in targeting,
- Page 39 and 40: Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithoto
- Page 41 and 42: PRESENTATIONHigh burden and complex
- Page 43 and 44: High burden and complex renal calcu
- Page 45 and 46: PRESENTATIONEndoscopic combined int
- Page 47 and 48: PRESENTATIONHigh burden stones: The
- Page 49 and 50: PRESENTATIONStone treatment in chil
- Page 51 and 52: Stone treatment in children: Where
- Page 53 and 54: PRESENTATIONExtracorporeal shock wa
- Page 55: PRESENTATIONPercutaneous nephrolith
- Page 59 and 60: Flexible ureteroscopy for kidney st
- Page 61 and 62: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 63 and 64: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 65 and 66: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 67 and 68: Indications, prediction of success
- Page 69 and 70: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery
- Page 71 and 72: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery
- Page 73 and 74: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery
- Page 75: Laparoscopic and open stone surgery