Figure 11 provides a graphical view of how the unit was able to operate at a higher netconversion range within the fractionator overhead gas handling limit in the 2007 cycle. Thisimprovement was achieved through the combination of a tailored catalyst system, state-of-artreactor internals, and new operating strategy. Previous Cycle • 2007 CycleFigure 11 – Fractionator Overhead Vapor Production Versus Net ConversionFigure 11 shows the fractionator overhead vapor production versus net conversion in the previouscycle and in the 2007 cycle. The overhead vapor production rate is on the Y axis and netconversion is on the X axis. This plot provides a graphical view of how the unit was able tooperate at a higher net conversion range within the fractionator overhead gas handling limit inthe 2007 cycle.AM-10-145Page 14
4. ConclusionsGuided by a refiner‘s short term and long term goals, Criterion/Zeolyst‘s hydrocracker catalystsystem solutions help enable refiners to increase profitability while flexibly meeting thechallenges of gasoline and diesel market volatility. The solutions involve complementary state ofthe art hydrocracking catalysts from Criterion/Zeolyst, the best in class reactor internals fromShell Global Solutions, and partnership with the refinery. <strong>Through</strong> this collaboration, evenduring a period of poor refinery margins and industry emphasis on cost reduction,Criterion/Zeolyst succeeded in enabling DPRC refinery to increase hydrocracker revenue by tensof millions of dollars by prioritizing distillate and heavy naphtha products from the hydrocrackeroperation, reinforced by reduced unit energy costs, by expanding the unit operating window,and by achieving a longer catalyst cycle. The solution for this refiner integrated a stacked bedstate-of-the-art catalyst system with Shell Global Solutions‘ ultra flat quench inter-bed internalsand high dispersion tray technology. Similar success can be anticipated for refiner‘s seekingmarket responsive, flexible hydrocracker catalytic solutions.5. References1. M. Hu, R. Anderson, R. Adarme, C. Ouwehand, and J. Smegal, ―The Era of ULSD – NewChallenges and Opportunities for Hydrocracking <strong>Process</strong>es,‖ NPRA 2006 Annual Meeting,AM-06-46.2. A. Sharpe, B. Jones, V. Hruska, G. Baumgartner, R. Anderson, R. Adarme, M. Hu, C.Ouwehand and M. Boer, ―A Success Story: Significant improvement in hydrocrackerprofitability with ULSD production through customized catalyst systems, state of the art reactorinternals and outstanding technical cooperation,‖ NPRA 2007 Annual Meeting, AM-07-67.3. R. Karlin, A. Macris, and R. Adarme, ―Dieselization in North America: Flexible Solutionsfor Diesel Production,‖ NPRA 2009 Annual Meeting, AM-09-10.4. Deactivation of Hydroprocessing Catalysts: Thermochemistry of Coke Formation, by PaulR. Robinson, presented at the Second International Symposium on Hydrotreating /Hydrocracking Technologies, American Chemical Society National Meeting, San Francisco,California, September 10, 2006.5. U.S. Energy Information Administration Short Term Outlook on diesel and motor oilprices.6. AcknowledgementsThe authors wish to thank and acknowledge the contributions of many colleagues in preparationand review of this paper:Criterion Catalysts & Technologies: Ward Koester, Mike Hu, Paul Robinson, Zoe StonebrakerShell Global Solutions: Robert Karlin, Aris Macris, Vito BavaroAM-10-145Page 15