12.07.2015 Views

Gyraulus parvus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Czech Republic

Gyraulus parvus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Czech Republic

Gyraulus parvus (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Czech Republic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

character is less pronounced <strong>in</strong> Oligoaeschna Selys, 1889 (<strong>in</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r Gomphaeschna Selys, 1871species and Gomphaeschna miocenica sp. n., <strong>the</strong> most distal cross-ve<strong>in</strong> of this area is opposite<strong>the</strong> base of IR2, but <strong>the</strong>re is one more <strong>in</strong> a slightly distal position at least <strong>in</strong> Oligoaeschna pryeri(Mart<strong>in</strong>, 1909) and Oligoaeschna modigliani (Selys, 1889).With<strong>in</strong> this family, <strong>the</strong> autapomorphy of <strong>the</strong> fossil subfamily Gomphaeschnaoid<strong>in</strong>ae Bechly etal., 2001 that could be visible <strong>in</strong> G. miocenica sp. n. is absent <strong>in</strong> this taxon: its pterostigmal braceve<strong>in</strong> is not very oblique. The o<strong>the</strong>r autapomorphies of <strong>the</strong> Gomphaeschnaoid<strong>in</strong>ae are unknown <strong>in</strong>G. miocenica sp. n.: “only a s<strong>in</strong>gle secondary antenodal cross-ve<strong>in</strong> between Ax1 and Ax2 alignedlike a primary antenodal bracket” and “<strong>in</strong> forew<strong>in</strong>g, Ax2 shifted basally on level of basal angle ofdiscoidal triangle”. As G. miocenica sp. n. has a plesiomorphic state of character, it is not sufficientto exclude it from this subfamily. Also, <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r subfamily “Gomphaeschn<strong>in</strong>ae” (sensu Bechly etal. 2001) has no known autapomorphy and could be paraphyletic. Never<strong>the</strong>less, G. miocenicasp. n. is very different from all Gomphaeschnaoid<strong>in</strong>i <strong>in</strong> its pterostigmal brace not undulat<strong>in</strong>g, <strong>the</strong>absence of any basally widened cell below pterostigma, its cross-ve<strong>in</strong>s between RP2 and RP1 allsimilar, not oblique. It also differs from <strong>the</strong> unique representative of <strong>the</strong> S<strong>in</strong>ojagor<strong>in</strong>i Bechly et al.,2001 (S<strong>in</strong>ojagoria Bechly et al., 2001) <strong>in</strong> its less numerous postnodal cross-ve<strong>in</strong>s and <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> basalpart of area between RP2 and RP1 (6 aga<strong>in</strong>st 10–12). Lastly, it differs from <strong>the</strong> Lower CretaceousAnomalaeschna berndschusteri Bechly et al., 2001 <strong>in</strong> its dist<strong>in</strong>ctly longer pterostigma, cover<strong>in</strong>g 2cells <strong>in</strong>stead of only one.With<strong>in</strong> “Gomphaeschn<strong>in</strong>ae”, <strong>the</strong> recent genus L<strong>in</strong>aeschna Mart<strong>in</strong>, 1909 is very different fromG. miocenica sp. n. <strong>in</strong> its very long postnodal area with numerous cross-ve<strong>in</strong>s and its absence ofgap <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> distal part of antesubnodal area (Mart<strong>in</strong> 1909). Bechly et al. (2001) considered that thisgenus could belong to a different family of <strong>the</strong> clade Aeshnoptera. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g genera areGomphaeschna, Oligoaeschna, Alloaeschna Wighton et Wilson, 1986 and Cretalloaeschna Jarzembowskiet Nel, 1996.The Lower Cretaceous Cretalloaeschna differs from G. miocenica sp. n. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g characters:(1) presence of one row of cells between RP3/4 and MA, (2) a straight IR2, (3) only 2 rowsof cells between IR2 and RP2, (4) 4–5 rows of cells between RP2 and RP1, <strong>in</strong>stead of 3 <strong>in</strong> G.miocenica sp. n. (Bechly et al. 2001). These authors <strong>in</strong>dicated that character (1) could represent asynapomorphy of Cretalloaeschna with Gomphaeschna, Gomphaeschnoides Carle et Wighton,1990 (<strong>in</strong> Gomphaeschnaoid<strong>in</strong>i), and Alloaeschna, but some specimens attributed to Alloaeschnapaskapooensis Wighton et Wilson, 1986 have 2 rows of cells def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g a long zigzagged ve<strong>in</strong>between RP3/4 and MA. Thus, this character is at least not so important, if subject to <strong>in</strong>traspecificvariation.The Late Paleocene genus Alloaeschna (at least A. paskapooensis and maybe A. marklaeWighton et Wilson, 1986) shares <strong>the</strong> autapomorphies proposed by Bechly et al. (2001) for <strong>the</strong>Gomphaeschnaoid<strong>in</strong>i, i. e. “presence of a characteristic elongate distal paranal cell <strong>in</strong> h<strong>in</strong>dw<strong>in</strong>g,longer than wide, directly basal of <strong>the</strong> anal loop” (see Wighton & Wilson 1986: Figs 1–10). InOligoaeschna and Gomphaeschna, <strong>the</strong> correspond<strong>in</strong>g cell is quadrate or transverse, wider thanlong; “pterostigmal brace ve<strong>in</strong> somewhat undulat<strong>in</strong>g”; “basally widened cell bellow pterostigma,caused by a curvature of RP1 at pterostigmal brace”; “posterior branches of CuAa relativelyweakly def<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> h<strong>in</strong>d w<strong>in</strong>g” (at least <strong>in</strong> some specimens of Alloaeschna paskapooensis). Thus,we propose to transfer Alloaeschna to this tribe, previously only known <strong>in</strong> Lower Cretaceous. Itwould be its most recent representative <strong>in</strong> Early Cenozoic. As noted above, <strong>the</strong> preserved correspond<strong>in</strong>gcharacters of pterostigmal region are different <strong>in</strong> Gomphaeschna miocenica sp. n.It is extremely difficult to separate <strong>the</strong> two genera Gomphaeschna and Oligoaeschna on <strong>the</strong>sole basis of <strong>the</strong> w<strong>in</strong>g venation characters. Madsen & Nel (1997) proposed to use <strong>the</strong> presence of147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!