440 <strong>THE</strong> CITY FOR <strong>THE</strong> PEOPLE.We will say a word about street railways and telephones, andthen take municipal lighting and localfor a somewhat fuller treatment,control of franchiseschoosing these subjects fordetailed discussion because they represent the area of greatestmovement most rapid advance toward municipal liberty inthe last few years.In five states there are general laws empowering municipalitiesto own and operate street railways. In Minnesota, anycity or village may, on a two-third referendum vote, buy andoperate street railways. In California, the power to build orbuy, own and operate street railways is given to 6th class cities(those of less than 3,000 inhabitants). <strong>The</strong> same full poweris conferred in Indiana upon cities of 35,000 people or more,belongs to every city council in Utah, and to every incorporatedcity and town in "Washington. (See Laws of 1897, Chap.112, and Washington "Codes & Statutes," 1897, 1076.)In 11 states there are general laws authorizing municipaltelegraphs or telephones or both, and in 6 of the states thepower is commercial. Maine, Massachusetts and Vermontgive their towns a general right to put up telegraph and telephonewires for their own use. North Dakota and Utah allowcities to erect municipal fire signals.(Cities would have thisright anyway under the general police power, without anyspecific law either general or special.) 1 In Kentucky, 3d classO It is well to remember, in dealing with Table II, that the absence ofgeneral legislation does not always indicate the absence of municipal power.For example, some states have no general laws conferring on cities or townsthe right to establish fire departments, yet it is practically a universal factthat cities and towns have that, right under special provisions of theircharters or as an implied authority under the broad power to provide for thesafety and welfare of the community. (Dillon, 143.) Perhaps authority toestablish a telegraph or telephone system for the use of city police and otherofficials might also be implied under the general police power. Markets maybe established by municipalises under implied authority based on ancientusage. (23 Pick. 71, C. J. Shaw.) Power to establish cemeteries and hospitalswill doubtless be implied from the general welfare or police clauseusual in municipal charters, and I think the power to establish public parksand bath houses, which may help to make hospitals unnecessary, ought alsoto be implied from the said clause. <strong>The</strong> lighting of streets, being a measurestrongly favoring safety and morality, should fall in the same class.A municipality having power to pass ordinances respecting the police ofthe place, and to preserve health, is authorized as a sanitary and policeregulation, to procure a supply of water and may bore an artesian well ortake any other requisite steps. (Dillon. 146, 8 Mich. 458; 66 Ind. 396; 31Ala. 542.) But while the right to establish water works is within the ordinarybroad chai'tor powers and needs no express grant, yet It Is subject toarbitrary revocation by the legislature at any time. For example, the cityof Memphis spent $30,000 getting plans, etc.. for water works, then thelegislature granted a private company the exclusive right to build waterworks In Memphis. This was held to revoke the city's right, altho it hadbegun to build. (Memphis v. Memphis Water Co., 5 Heisk. 495.) For gas,electric light, street railway, telephone and other plants, for serving theinhabitants generally, there is no doubt that authority will not be implied,
HOME RULE FOR OUR <strong>CITIES</strong>. 441cities (8,000 to 20,000) may supplyinhabitants with telephoneservice. In Washington, 3d class cities (1,500 to 10,-000) and towns (all municipalities of less than "",500 inhabitants)have authority "To permit under such restrictions asthey may deem proper, the laying of railroad tracks and therunning of cars drawn by horses, steam, electricity or otherpower thereon, or the laying of gas and water pipes in thepublic streets, and to construct and maintain and to permitthe construction and maintenance of TELEGKAPH, TELE-PHONE (and electric light) lines therein." (Track and Pipeclause, Codes & Statutes, 1897, 938, 13.) Note that thegeneral charter laws for 1st class cities (those over 20,000) and2d class cities (those between 10,000 and 20,000) do not containthe above clause. 2d class cities, however, in commonwith 3d class cities and towns "may purchase, leceive, have,take, hold, lease, use and enjoy property of every name anddescription, and control and dispose of the same for the commonbenefit." One not familiar with legal ways of doingthings might think that this would cover the telephone andeverything else, and it might be so held in court. If such agrant of power stood alone it would be very broadly construed,but as it isaccompanied by a long enumeration of powers toestablish water works, hospitals, docks, etc., the courts mayconstrue the broad power in reference to the enumeration and.iold that the broad clause gives authority to acquire and holdproperty of all sorts when needful for the specific purposesnamed in the express enumeration of powers.In California, 3d class cities (15,000 to 30,000) have thesame Track & Pipe clause as in Washington except that theitalicized words and those in parenthesis are omitted 4th,5th and 6th class cities (which three classes include all municipalitiesunder 15,000 inhabitants) have the Track & Pipeclause, italicized words, and all except the parenthesis. 1stclass cities,or those over 100,000, have no "Track & Pipe"clause except this: "To permit the laying down of railroadthat special requests are apt to meet with strenuous opposition and frequentdefeat, and that no substantial liberty in these directions Is possessed bymunicipalitiesin the absence of general laws or constitutional provisions.<strong>The</strong> same thing is true in respect to the columns that deal with franchises,,local consent and power to grant.