Download Full Volume - UDC Law Review

More documents

Recommendations

Info

YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR.35Table 2Bar Passage Rates, First Attempt and Law School GP ABy QuartileUDC·DCSL2003·2008QuartileBar Pass RateFirst AttemptBar Pass Rate SecondAttempt1 st 2.59 or less 25.0% 21.0%2nd 2.60-2.90 52.0% 24.7%3rd 2.91-3.15 67.1 % 21.0%4th 3.16 or higher 86.8% 7.4%Source: UDC-DCSLC. Bar Pass Rates and Law School GPA, 2007-08The UDC-DCSL bar passage rate after the first attempt increased significantlyfrom 2003-2006 to 2007-2008. As shown in Table 3 the bar pass rate on firstattempt in the data increased from 52.7% in 2003-2006 to 69.7% in 2007-2008, an18.00/0 increase. The bar passage rate for the bottom half of the class increased19.60/0, from 31.3% to 50.9%.Table 3Bar Passage Rates and Law School GP ABy 50 PercentileUDC·DCSL2003·06; 2007·082003·06All StudentsBar Pass Rate First Attempt 51.7%Bar Pass Rate26.7%Multiple AttemptsBottom Half of ClassBar Pass Rate First Attempt 31.3%Bar Pass Rate Multiple32.5%AttemptsSource: UDC-DCSL2007·08ImprovementImprovement inin OverallFirst AttemptPass Rate69.7% 18.0% 7.5%12.6%50.9% 19.6% 5.3%18.2%
36 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICr OF COLUMBIA LAW REVIEWD. Bar Review Skills Program! PTEXThe next issue, and the critical one for this article, is the impact of the barreview program on bar passage rates. Over the entire study period there was a14.7% difference between bar passage rates on the first attempts of those whoparticipated in the Bar Skills Class/PTEX practicum and those who did not participatein the bar review class (Table 4). For students in the bottom half of theclass, there was a 25.0% improvement in the bar passage rates of students whotook the Bar Skills Class/PTEX practicum versus those who did not participate inthe class.Table 4First Time Bar Passage RateBar Review Class ParticipationUDC·DCSL2003·2008Class ParticipantBar Pass RateFirst AttemptOverall 62.50/0Bottom Halfof ClassSource: UDC-DCSL46.60/0Non ParticipantBar Pass RateFirst AttemptPercentageImprovement47.8% 14.70/021.6% 25.0%The differences were less pronounced for 2007-2008. Overall the bar passagerates for students who participated in the PTEX classes were somewhat lowerthan for those students who did not participate in the class. The bar passage onfirst attempt for the bottom half of the class was larger for students taking thePTEX class, but the percentage improvement was not as significant (about 9.2%).
Page 2: University of the District of Colum
Page 6 and 7: University of the District of Colum
Page 8 and 9: 2 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRWr OF COL
Page 10 and 11: 4 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICr OF CO
Page 12 and 13: 6 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTIUcr OF CO
Page 14 and 15: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. UNIVERSIT
Page 16 and 17: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 11In resp
Page 18 and 19: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 13uated f
Page 20 and 21: YES WE CAN. PASS THE BAR.The Univer
Page 22 and 23: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 17C. Iden
Page 24 and 25: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 19The Pro
Page 26 and 27: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 21Accordi
Page 28 and 29: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 23calcula
Page 30 and 31: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 25The Ame
Page 32 and 33: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR.ing the su
Page 34 and 35: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 29writing
Page 36 and 37: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 31tion, s
Page 38 and 39: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 33activit
Page 42 and 43: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR.37Table 5B
Page 44 and 45: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR. 39(X 2 =4
Page 46 and 47: YES WE CAN, PASS THE BAR.41ApPENDIX
Page 48 and 49: 44 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICT OF C
Page 50 and 51: 46 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICr OF C
Page 52 and 53: 48 UNIVEI~SITY OF TilE DISTRICT OF
Page 54 and 55: 50 UNIVm~SITY OF TilE DISTRICr (W C
Page 56 and 57: 52 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTIUCr OF CO
Page 58 and 59: 54 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICI' OF
Page 60 and 61: 56 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRICT OF C
Page 62 and 63: 58 UNIVEI~SITY OF TilE DISTRICr OF
Page 68 and 69: 64 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CO
Page 70 and 71: 66 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICI' OF
Page 72 and 73: 68 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICr OF C
Page 74 and 75: 70 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICr OF CO
Page 76 and 77: 72 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF CO
Page 80 and 81: 76 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRICr OF C
Page 82 and 83: 78 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICI" OF
Page 84 and 85: 80 UNIVERSUY OF TIlE DISTRICT OF CO
Page 86 and 87: 82 UNIVERsrrv OF TilE DISTRICT OF C
Page 88 and 89: 84 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRICT OF C
Page 90 and 91:
86 UNIVEHSITY OF TIlE DISTHICr OF C
Page 92 and 93:
88 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE Disnucl' OF C
Page 94 and 95:
90 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICT OF C
Page 96 and 97:
92 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DIS"IlUcr OF
Page 98 and 99:
94 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRICr OF C
Page 100 and 101:
96 UNIVERSITY OF TI IE DISTRICr OF
Page 102 and 103:
98 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICr OF C
Page 104 and 105:
100 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRICr OF
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
104 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICr OF
Page 110 and 111:
106 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTIUCr OF C
Page 112 and 113:
108 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICr OF C
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
112 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICT OF C
Page 118 and 119:
A DISCUSSION ON THE DISTRICT OF COL
Page 120 and 121:
IGNORING THE LAW FOR EXPEDIENCY'S S
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
134 UNIVEI{SITY OF TilE DISTRICT OF
Page 138 and 139:
136 UNIVEI~SITY OF TIlE DISTRICT OF
Page 140 and 141:
138 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICT OF
Page 142 and 143:
140 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRIC(, OF
Page 144 and 145:
142 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICf OF
Page 146 and 147:
144 UNIVEHSITY OF TI IE DISTRICT OF
Page 148 and 149:
146 UNIVEI~SITY OF TIlE DISTRICr OF
Page 150 and 151:
Page 152 and 153:
Page 154 and 155:
152 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRICT OF
Page 156 and 157:
154 UNIVEI~SITY OF THE DlsTRlcr OF
Page 158 and 159:
Page 160 and 161:
158 UNIVEH.srrv OF THE DISTRICr OF
Page 162 and 163:
160 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTIUcr OF
Page 164 and 165:
162 UNIVERSITY OF TilE Dls'nucr OF
Page 166 and 167:
Page 168 and 169:
166 UNIVERSITY OF THE DISTRICr OF C
Page 170 and 171:
168 UNIVERSfrY OF HIE DISTRICr OF C
Page 172 and 173:
170 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICt' OF
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
174 UNIVEI{SITY OF THE DISTRICT OF
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180 and 181:
178 UNIVEltSl'l'V OF THE DISTIUCI'
Page 182 and 183:
180 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTRICT (W
Page 184 and 185:
182 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICT OF
Page 186 and 187:
Page 188 and 189:
Page 190 and 191:
188 UNIVERSITY OF TilE DISTRICt' OF
Page 192 and 193:
Page 194 and 195:
JURISPRUDENCE FOR A DIGITAL AGE: FR
Page 196 and 197:
JURISPRUDENCE FOR A DIGITAL AGE 195
Page 198 and 199:
Page 200 and 201:
Page 202 and 203:
Page 204 and 205:
Page 206 and 207:
Page 208 and 209:
Page 210 and 211:
THE CHILD ONLINE PRIVACY PROTECTION
Page 212 and 213:
Page 214 and 215:
Page 216 and 217:
Page 218 and 219:
THE CHILD ONLINE PRIVACY PROTECfION
Page 220 and 221:
Page 222 and 223:
Page 224 and 225:
Page 226 and 227:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS:A CASE A
Page 228 and 229:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS 227under
Page 230 and 231:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS 229ual,
Page 232 and 233:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS 231Day c
Page 234 and 235:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS 233who,
Page 236 and 237:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS 235sions
Page 238 and 239:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS 237Omars
Page 240 and 241:
THE RUCKUS IN THE CAUCASUS 239ment.
Page 242 and 243:
Page 244 and 245:
244 UNIVERSfl"Y OF TIlE DISTRICT OF
Page 246 and 247:
246 UNIVI ~ I(SITY 01 ' TI l E DIST
Page 248 and 249:
Page 250 and 251:
Page 252 and 253:
Page 254 and 255:
Page 256 and 257:
256 UNIVERSITY OF nlE DIS'IlUCT OF
Page 258 and 259:
258 UNIVERSITY OF TIlE DISTIUcr OF
Page 260:
show all

Download Full Volume - UDC Law Review

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?