JEWISH AFFAIRS ROSH HASHANAH <strong>2009</strong>throughout.Day One <strong>of</strong> the DRC on Monday, 20 April,started with a bang thanks to Ahmadinejad. As theonly Head <strong>of</strong> State present, the privilege <strong>of</strong> deliveringthe first <strong>of</strong> the speeches by participating countrieswas his. His address featured all the extremist anti-Israel language and antisemitic sentiment that hadmade the 2001 event so problematic. Ahmadinejadhad already acquired a well-deserved reputation as aHolocaust Denier, and now further confirmed it byaccusing Israel <strong>of</strong> occupying Palestinian territories“on the pretext <strong>of</strong> <strong>Jewish</strong> suffering”. Amongst otherincendiary statements, he further accused Israel <strong>of</strong>establishing a “cruel and repressive racist regime”over Palestinians.It was gratifying indeed to see the massive walkoutthat followed when Ahmadinejad began todemonise Israel and Zionists, resulting in a visiblyempty hall. Representatives <strong>of</strong> most EU countries, aswell as from Morocco, Jordan and even the PalestinianAuthority (almost certainly for political reasons,given Iran’s support for the rival Hamas faction,rather than as a protest over the anti-Israel sentiment)took part. The Foreign Minister <strong>of</strong> Norway stronglyrebuked the Ahmadinejad speech when it was histurn to speak and his condemnation was supportedby <strong>South</strong> <strong>African</strong> Foreign Minister Dlamini Zuma inher remarks. Other delegates and <strong>of</strong>ficials in thecourse <strong>of</strong> the next few days similarly criticizedAhmadinejad. It should be noted, however, thatwhile the walk out was effective; there were countriesthat applauded Ahmadinejad’s statements.The IJC was incensed that a man representing acountry inflicting such grotesque human rightsviolations (besides his Holocaust Denial and ‘wipeIsrael <strong>of</strong>f the map’ pronouncements) could be allowedto be one <strong>of</strong> the introductory speakers at a conferencepurporting to be further the causes <strong>of</strong> human rightsand opposing racism. That a notorious HolocaustDenier had spoken on the very eve <strong>of</strong> Yom Hashoahcompounded the outrage we all felt.Encouraging from a <strong>South</strong> <strong>African</strong> point <strong>of</strong> viewwas Foreign Affairs Minister Dr. Nkosazana DlaminiZuma’s support for the Norwegian Foreign Ministercondemnation <strong>of</strong> the Ahmadinejad speech, with hercomments that the forum was not a place for “hatredThe author and Marc Pozniak at the Yom Hashoahceremony, Geneva, <strong>2009</strong>.and finger pointing” and her mention <strong>of</strong> the Shoah.Also interesting to us as <strong>South</strong> <strong>African</strong>s was thereading <strong>of</strong> a message from Nelson Mandela about thevalues <strong>of</strong> anti- racism and the importance <strong>of</strong> thisconference. I was pleased that a senior <strong>South</strong> <strong>African</strong>government representative attended the three-hourYom Hashoah ceremony on the Monday night <strong>of</strong> theconference.The Yom Hashoah ceremony, organised by theGeneva <strong>Jewish</strong> community, with thousands gatheringin the square in front <strong>of</strong> the Palais de Nations(headquarters <strong>of</strong> the UN) for the occasion. Memorablemoments were the magnificent Yizkor loudlyproclaiming our grief outside the gates <strong>of</strong> the UN, theimpassioned speeches by Eli Wiesel, Irwin Cotlerand French philosopher Bernard Henri Levy and achildren’s choir singing the Partisans’ Song as thecrowd held up candles. It was an opportunity to focuson the real issues <strong>of</strong> human rights and to mourn a timewhen these were completely forgotten.The conference document was formally adoptedon Tuesday, Day Two <strong>of</strong> the DRC, and this wasfollowed by submissions by all the countries present.The government submissions included a long string<strong>of</strong> condemnations <strong>of</strong> Ahmadinejad’s <strong>of</strong>fensiveaddress, mainly coming from Argentina, Ukraine,the UK, France, Sweden and Spain, as well as fromAustria, Lithuania and the Holy See. The UNSecretary General and High Commissioner Pillaywere also highly critical.The last country to present their submission wasIran who, as anticipated, was quite unrepentant forits leader’s actions. Its representative heavilycriticized Norway and other countries that hadattacked Ahmadinejad, invoked ‘freedom <strong>of</strong>expression as a human right’ and called for countries31
JEWISH AFFAIRS ROSH HASHANAH <strong>2009</strong>Members <strong>of</strong> the International <strong>Jewish</strong> Caucus team inaction during the United Nations Durban ReviewConference.to cease from making ‘judgmental remarks’.In the final Declaration eventually adopted by theconference, the reference to Antisemitism wasretained (par. 12), and the reference to the Holocaustwas actually strengthened by urging all states toimplement the General Assembly resolutions callingfor Holocaust commemoration and condemningHolocaust denial (par. 66). The controversial“Defamation <strong>of</strong> Religion” clause, which was intendedby its sponsors as stifling criticism <strong>of</strong> Islam, wasexcluded. However, there was an indirect referenceto Israel in a paragraph calling for the need to addressthe problems arising from ‘foreign occupation’ (par.5), which is UN-speak for Gaza and the West Banksituation.Marc and I had two outstanding meetings onTuesday. First, we met with Advocate TselisoThipanyane, CEO <strong>of</strong> the SA Human RightsCommission, who was in Geneva to present thesubmission on behalf <strong>of</strong> similar Human Rightsadvocacy bodies from around the world. He spentconsiderable time briefing us on human rights andNGOs in <strong>South</strong> Africa, as well providing us withsome fascinating insights on the DRC itself.That evening, we met with the SA governmentdelegation for a very warm and informative session.Beulah Naidoo, a senior member <strong>of</strong> the delegationand Chairperson at the Regional Preparatory meetingfor the DRC in Abuja, gave us a full briefing on manyissues and allowed us an opportunity to ask questionsand receive clarification on issues <strong>of</strong> relevance to theIJC. We also had an opportunity to speak withMinister Dlamini Zuma and the SA Ambassador tothe UN.The Darfur protest rally, organized by theEuropean <strong>Jewish</strong> students in tandem with Darfurvictims, was one <strong>of</strong> the highlights <strong>of</strong> Day Two.Holding banners, wearing t-shirts and distributingmaterials, the protestors stood on the edge <strong>of</strong> thesquare in front <strong>of</strong> the Palais de Nations andcommunicated their messages to passing traffic andpedestrians. A lone anti-Israel protester sheepishlyleft after being confronted by the Darfuri participants.I attended a symposium in a venue next to thePlenary Hall entitled “Antisemitism and Intolerance:In the Here and Now”. Speakers included NobelLaureate Elie Wiesel, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Alan Dershowitz,the renowned actor Jon Voight, Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Steele,Father Patrick Desbois (who works with EastEuropean countries to find <strong>Jewish</strong> bodies that did notreceive a suitable burial and seeks to remedy this)and Natan Sharansky. The venue was completelycrammed, to the extent that people had to be turnedaway. I chatted with Dershowitz afterwards, tellinghim <strong>of</strong> the row his statements re Tutu had caused inSA and asking for clarification. He confirmed that hehad called Tutu a “racist and a bigot” and that he fullystood by this.Geneva woke up to Day Three <strong>of</strong> the DRC while<strong>South</strong> <strong>African</strong>s were waking up to Election Day.Once again, there was great activity in the IJC caucus<strong>of</strong>fices as we frantically set about preparing statementsfor the session. One <strong>of</strong> these was an NGO sessionwith UN High Commissioner Navi Pillay, in whichaccredited NGOs would be asking questions. One <strong>of</strong>the questions was submitted on behalf <strong>of</strong> the SAJBD.A number <strong>of</strong> interesting points came out <strong>of</strong> thissession. It was notable that no overtly anti-Israelquestions were posed, which would certainly nothave been the case in 2001. A representative from aFrench <strong>African</strong> NGO asked a lengthily question inwhich he condemned pro-Palestinian groups forhijacking the conference and detracting from thevoices <strong>of</strong> the real victims. Sitting opposite us (anddoing exceptional networking at the conference)was a trio <strong>of</strong> Neturei Karta representatives sportingPalestinian flag badges. Thanks to UN regulations,they at least had to leave their trademark sandwichboards at home.Following extensive debates (and some seriousconfusion) it was determined that approximately 150NGOs would be making two-minute submissions atthe Plenary stage. Thanks to our interaction with theSA delegation, we were able to assist the IJC withinformation enabling it to secure slots and four<strong>Jewish</strong> NGOs ultimately made submissions. Oneslot was used on behalf <strong>of</strong> the IJC, and this submissionwas presented by the co-Chair <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Jewish</strong> HumanRights Coalition (UK), Rosalind Preston.Was the DRC like Durban 1?When drafting its International <strong>Jewish</strong> Coalitionstatement, the IJC included the comment, “The WorldConference Against Racism in 2001 is rememberedfor the antisemitism on the streets <strong>of</strong> Durban. TheDurban Review in Geneva will be remembered forthe antisemitism within the Assembly hall <strong>of</strong> the UN,as clearly spelt out by Iran’s President.” It must beremembered, however, that Ahmadinejad’s speechwas followed by unequivocal condemnation by manycountries, by the Secretary General <strong>of</strong> the UN and theHRC High Commissioner.None <strong>of</strong> the violent and overt antisemitism asseen in Durban in 2001 was evident in Geneva. Theevent was monitored closely by the authorities, whoshowed a zero tolerance for any unruly behavior orviolation <strong>of</strong> the rules. As for the anti-Israel or pro-32