12.07.2015 Views

Adding gloss to Colgate Palmolive's packaging

Adding gloss to Colgate Palmolive's packaging

Adding gloss to Colgate Palmolive's packaging

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A mixed bag on the financial sideThe financial year that ended in February had a couple ofhighlights but these were overshadowed by aspects that didn’tperform <strong>to</strong> our expectations.4.9%1.9%37.1%3.5%VolumesNon-operationalCostsHeadline EarningsPer ShareTurnoverThe good news first: Group turnoverwas up <strong>to</strong> R2.71 billion (2010 : R2.61billion), an increase of 3.5% over lastyear, and on the volume side we had animpressive increase of almost 5%. Whenyou consider the general state of theeconomy – a highly competitive market,and slow consumer demand coupledwith declining selling prices – these weretwo very positive developments.And now for the bad news: increasingelectricity, labour, distribution anddepreciation costs all had a majorimpact on operational profitability,and while turnover was up, so were ourmanufacturing expenses. This led <strong>to</strong> analmost 12% drop in profit. (One positiveaspect was that our non-manufacturingcosts increased by a marginal 1.9%,which represents good control on theselling, administration and distributionoverhead side.)Some of the fac<strong>to</strong>rs that contributed <strong>to</strong>the less-than-stellar results were:• A protracted period of industrialaction during the last financial year atseveral of our operations, including ourbiggest single plant which, in addition<strong>to</strong> lost operational revenue, cost theGroup an additional R45 million.• A lethal cocktail of increasedcompetition with aggressive sellingprices as competi<strong>to</strong>rs strive <strong>to</strong> keepplants busy in the face of decliningconsumer demand, plus pricingpressure from cus<strong>to</strong>mers.• An environment that made itextremely difficult <strong>to</strong> timeously recoupincreased electricity and raw-materialprice increases.• Increased depreciation costs due<strong>to</strong> the delay in implementing a line ofequipment that was installed butnot fully operational.In spite of the results, the Group is stillcommitted <strong>to</strong> its capital expenditureprogramme, because it’s by investingin technology that we’ll secure ourfuture. Plastic <strong>packaging</strong> is going <strong>to</strong> bewith us for a long time <strong>to</strong> come, as itremains one of the most cost-effectiveways of protecting and presentinga wide range of products. We mustensure that we’re able <strong>to</strong> not onlymeet the needs of the future but beinnovative and set the trends.On the corporate front it was arelatively quiet year. The Groupacquired the remaining shares in thePlastech group, while at head officeGene Lapan resigned from his positionas company secretary and XolisaVabaza was appointed <strong>to</strong> the post. Seepage 5 for more on Xolisa.What of the future? You only have <strong>to</strong>listen <strong>to</strong> the radio or read a newspaper<strong>to</strong> know that there are still <strong>to</strong>ughtimes ahead. Astrapak is in it for thelong haul, however. Our commitment<strong>to</strong> new plant and equipment istestimony <strong>to</strong> that, but it will still requirea concerted effort from everyone inthe Group <strong>to</strong> help it make it happen.A machine is a machine is a machine;it’s the people who make the machineperform its wonders.2ASTRAPAK NEWS

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!