12.07.2015 Views

Ecological Land Classification of Mount Revelstoke and Glacie r ...

Ecological Land Classification of Mount Revelstoke and Glacie r ...

Ecological Land Classification of Mount Revelstoke and Glacie r ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ENGELMANN SPRUCE - SUBALPINE FIR ECOREGIO NThe Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Ecoregion occurs at altitudes above the Interior Cedar-Hemloc kEcoregion <strong>and</strong> below the unforested Alpine Ecoregion . It is divided into Lower Subalpine <strong>and</strong> Uppe rSubalpine portions .Lower Subalpin eThe Lower Subalpine is characterized by closed forests dominated by Picea engelmannii <strong>and</strong> Abies lasiocarpa. Tsuga mertensiana is <strong>of</strong>ten codominant <strong>and</strong> Tsuga heterophylla occurs in the lower part <strong>of</strong>the Lower Subalpine . The Lower Subalpine occurs from 1500 to 1900 m in MRNP <strong>and</strong> 1450 to 200 0m in GNP . This range is slightly higher on warm aspects <strong>and</strong> lower on cooler aspects . Typical v .t .sinclude Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir/tall bilberry/liverwort (C21), mountain hemlock-subalpinefir/rhododendron-tall bilberry (C47), Engelmann spruce-mountain hemlock/rhododendron-tall bilberry(C48), mountain hemlock-Douglas fir-subalpine fir-Engelmann spruce/rhododendron-tall bilberry(C49) <strong>and</strong> Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir/rhododendron-tall bilberry (021) . The drier climat eeast <strong>of</strong> the Beaver River in GNP is also reflected in the vegetation <strong>of</strong> the Lower Subalpine as in th eICH Ecoregion . Pinus contorta occurs here <strong>and</strong> not further west, Tsuga mertensiana is mostly absent ,<strong>and</strong> Pachystima myrsinites is more common <strong>and</strong> widespread .The Lower Subalpine corresponds to the lower part <strong>of</strong> the Interior Subalpine Forest Section (SA.2) <strong>of</strong>Rowe (1972), although his lower boundary is about 300 m lower than recognized here . The Lowe rSubalpine west <strong>of</strong> the Beaver River corresponds to the lower part <strong>of</strong> the Wet Forested EngelmannSpruce-Subalpine Fir Subzone (ESSFb) <strong>of</strong> the biogeoclimatic classification <strong>of</strong> the Nelson Forest Region(Utzig et al. 1983) . It seems to correspond wholly with the Wet Central EngelmannSpruce-Subalpine Fir Subzone (ESSFw) <strong>of</strong> the Kamloops Forest Region, just to the west (Lloy d1983) . The Lower Subalpine east <strong>of</strong> the Beaver River comes closest to the Moist Southern ForestedEngelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Subzone (ESSFc, Utzig et al. 1983) . Since eastern GNP is clearly inthe transition between the Wet <strong>and</strong> Moist Climatic Regions, it does not fit the central concept o fESSFc fully . For example, some Tsuga heterophylla occurs in eastern GNP, although it is typicall yabsent in ESSFc .Upper SubalpineThe Upper Subalpine typically has open forests dominated by Picea engelmannii <strong>and</strong> Abies lasiocarpa .Closed Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir forests occur on warm aspects <strong>and</strong> in the lower part <strong>of</strong> th eUpper Subalpine, but characteristically contain Cassiope mertensiana, Phyllodoce empetriformis <strong>and</strong>Luetkea pectinata <strong>and</strong> lack Menziesia glabella or Oplopanax horridum . Tsuga mertensiana is alsocommon, <strong>of</strong>ten as a codominant . The Upper Subalpine occurs from 1900 to 2200 m in MRNP an d2000 to 2300 m in GNP, the boundary being lower on cool aspects <strong>and</strong> higher on warm ones . Typicalv.t .s include subalpine fir-mountain hemlock/heather-luetkea (020), subalpine fir-whitebarkpine-(Engelmann spruce)/tall bilberry-heather (022) <strong>and</strong> mountain hemlock-subalpine fir/rhododendron-tallbilberry (C47) . The Upper Subalpine east <strong>of</strong> the Beaver River is drier but the difference i snot as great as in the Lower Subalpine <strong>and</strong> Interior Cedar-Hemlock . The primary effect is a de -creased amount <strong>of</strong> Tsuga mertensiana <strong>and</strong> more <strong>of</strong> the Engelmann spruce-subalpine fir/heather (010 )v .t . Lush herb meadows (fleabane-valerian (H16)) are also typical <strong>of</strong> the Upper Subalpine .The upper part <strong>of</strong> the Interior Subalpine Forest Section (Rowe 1972) corresponds to the Upper Sub -alpine . The Upper Subalpine west <strong>of</strong> the Beaver River corresponds to the upper part <strong>of</strong> the WetForested Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir Subzone (ESSFb) <strong>and</strong> to the Wet Parkl<strong>and</strong> EngelmannSpruce-Subalpine Fir Subzone (ESSFbp) in the biogeoclimatic classification <strong>of</strong> the Nelson Forest Region(Utzig et al. 1983) . In the Kamloops Forest Region (Lloyd 1983), the Upper Subalpine fits bestthe Wet Upper Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir (ESSFu) <strong>and</strong> Wet Parkl<strong>and</strong> Engelman nSpruce .Subalpine Fir (ESSFbp) Subzones . The Upper Subalpine east <strong>of</strong> the Beaver River is closest tothé Moist Southern Parkl<strong>and</strong> Engelmann Spruce-Subalpine Fir (ESSFbp) (Utzig et al . 1983) .36

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!