12.07.2015 Views

Read More DNAPrint Log Entries for Prior Year of 2005 - Kerchner

Read More DNAPrint Log Entries for Prior Year of 2005 - Kerchner

Read More DNAPrint Log Entries for Prior Year of 2005 - Kerchner

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong><strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>Copyright © <strong>2005</strong>, Charles F. <strong>Kerchner</strong>, Jr.All Rights ReservedLegend: IE=Indo-European, EA=East Asian, NA-Native American, SSAF=Sub-Saharan Africanpopulation groups.Guest: Gregory Alan GeorgeDate-Time: Monday, December 26, <strong>2005</strong> at 11:14:13 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: IE 100%My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: IE 92,NA 8%,African 0%,<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 12 August 2003Comments: I expected to see 100 Indo-European results.DnaPrint repoerted 92% Indo-European& 8% Native American.This is a surprize. I have researched numerous maternal branches in mytraditional genealogical research and they go back to Virginia,North Carolina,Pennsylvania,Maryland in the 18th century.I also have maternal branches arriving in the 19th century in NewYork.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): ggeorge14-Monday-cox.netGuest: Floyd WeldonDate-Time: Saturday, December 24, <strong>2005</strong> at 01:16:37 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 95,0,5,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 92,6,0,2<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 17 November <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Y-DNA: R1b, mtDNA: H8 I was surprised to see 0% <strong>for</strong> the Native American group. Ihad been told that my maternal great great grandmother was Native American and born on areservation in Oklahoma. The East Asian and Sub-Saharan African percentages were a little <strong>of</strong> asurprise but I suppose that the percentages are so low that it could just be noise. Even though theNA was 0%, the red bar indicated that it was 2 times less likely to be as much as 12% and <strong>for</strong> theAF group which was set at 2% had a red bar indicating that it could be at the most 8%. Why isthere a possibility <strong>of</strong> 12% variation <strong>for</strong> NA and only a 6% variation possibility <strong>for</strong> AF? I do notfeel quite sure in my interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>DNAPrint</strong>.Email address (To use delete '-Saturday-' and add @ sign in that position): fhweldon-Saturdayadelphia.netGuest: John P. BirkemoDate-Time: Thursday, December 08, <strong>2005</strong> at 08:53:17 (CST)file:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (1 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups:My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 94,6,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 205Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Nov 23. <strong>2005</strong>Comments: well I took my ancestrybydna test, most unexpected results, Ive had a feeling I wasNative American from father and grandmother, both dead, so does the EA mean Im NA, Im lost,what do I do next dig up my grandmother, Im not from asiaEmail address (To use delete '-Thursday-' and add @ sign in that position): jbirkemo-Thursdayyahoo.comGuest: Layne AlbertDate-Time: Thursday, December 08, <strong>2005</strong> at 00:35:40 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: EU, AF, EA, NAM expextationswere: 87.5, 0, 0, 12.5My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: EU, AF, EA, NAM resultswere:96, 4, 0, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Sept <strong>2005</strong>Comments: The contour lines showed in 3 <strong>of</strong> the triangles on the triangle plot. The expectedamount <strong>of</strong> NAM was shown in the "10 fold less likely" line (the yellow contour). This also showeda likely hood <strong>of</strong> EA. The bar graph showed about 8% <strong>for</strong> 2 fold less likely.Email address (To use delete '-Thursday-' and add @ sign in that position): bcronin-Thursdaycogeco.caGuest: Larry RutledgeGuest's Website: http://dna.rutledges.infoDate-Time: Tuesday, November 29, <strong>2005</strong> at 17:48:53 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 81,0.19.0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 85,9,6,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 22 July <strong>2005</strong>Comments: These results were received October 31, <strong>2005</strong>, and are an upgrade from <strong>DNAPrint</strong> ver2.0 reported May 7 2003. Ver 2.0 results were 91% IE,9% EA, 0% NA,0% SSAF. Ver 2.5 resultsshow 85% IE,9% EA, 6% NA,0% SSAF. Expected results 81% IE,0% EA,19% NA,0% SSAF The6% NA surprisingly was deducted from the IE results in the ver 2.0 test, and the EA componentremained the same (9%). I still have no indication <strong>of</strong> EA in my ancestry. The Euro 1.0 resulltswere reported as 48% Northern European, 24% Middle Eastern, 18% Southeastern European,and 10% South Asian. My Y Haplogroup was estimated as R1B, and my mtDNA is U2. There is afamily history <strong>of</strong> NA ancestry on both, the paternal and maternal sides. I have recently found thatmy maternal line traces back to Hancock Co., TN and a probable Melungeon heritage, throughthe surname <strong>of</strong> Wallen.Email address (To use delete '-Tuesday-' and add @ sign in that position): dna_log-Tuesdayfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm(2 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>rutledges.orgGuest: David A. Meeks IIDate-Time: Sunday, November 27, <strong>2005</strong> at 08:59:17 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 97,0,3,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 93,4,0,3<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 3 November <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I'm adding these results <strong>for</strong> my step-son David MeeksII. His father's results were94,6,0,0. The results are pretty much what we expected (considering <strong>of</strong> course that the 4% EAresults were probally due to NA genealogy),except we did not expect the 3% SSA. My husband didnot test positive <strong>for</strong> SSA, so we feel it's from his biological mother. We all plan to purchase theEuro 1.0 test in the future.Email address (To use delete '-Sunday-' and add @ sign in that position): bigalspal-Sunday-charter.netGuest: AMCDate-Time: Thursday, November 24, <strong>2005</strong> at 00:19:53 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 45, 0, 10, 45My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 37, 0, 3, 60<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: October <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I was slightly surprised at the results. I assumed because <strong>of</strong> my family members'general phenotypes (eye color, hair texture, and pigmentation) as well as the origins <strong>of</strong> two <strong>of</strong> mygrandfathers and a great-grandfather that my siblings I would have more IE and/or NA. I readsomewhere about a margin <strong>of</strong> error in the test being 4-8%. I don't know how accurate that is or ifthat means anything <strong>for</strong> my results. Anyway, I was sort <strong>of</strong> pleased with the results but am stillunsure <strong>of</strong> their accuracy. I would like to begin researching more and piecing my family's puzzletogether. I think I am going to have another sibling take the test as well as my mother and seewhat happens. Then I can determine how flawed I think it is, I suppose.Email address (To use delete '-Thursday-' and add @ sign in that position): gigicalloway-Thursdayaol.comGuest: CWCDate-Time: Monday, November 21, <strong>2005</strong> at 23:07:56 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 83, 9, 3, 5<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: September <strong>2005</strong>Comments: These are my mother's results. We expected 100% European and were surprised t<strong>of</strong>ind percentages in all four groups! (She was extremely surpised.) My results were 97% Europeanand 3% Native American, so I'm confused as to why my DNA doesn't show any <strong>of</strong> the East Asianfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (3 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>or Sub-Saharan African. We now want to test my father and possibly a sibling in an attempt tobetter understand all <strong>of</strong> this.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): catcoop-Mondaybellsouth.netGuest: Shoshone PegueseGuest's Website: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/nativesistergroup/Date-Time: Monday, November 21, <strong>2005</strong> at 21:35:11 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 10, 0, 4, 86My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 13, 4, 0, 83<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered:Comments: I guessed pretty close based on my family research and oral history. I get most <strong>of</strong> theEuropean and Native american(EA/Native American) from my mother. My father who is a fromthe Gullah people/Beau<strong>for</strong>d, SC are have very strong african genes and cultural affinities. Theeast Asian result were confirmed as Native American. This category overlaps and can be either orsince Native americans had East Asian Origins coming from Asia. My maternal side traces back toa full blooded Native american ancestor North Carolina. Susan/Kila Ashe??? Born 1827 probablyin Guild<strong>for</strong>d, NC. My haplogroup came back as A, confirming American Indian Maternal decent.The 13% European also comes from the Native americans intermixing with many Mulattoancestors. Many <strong>of</strong> the mulatto ancestors were <strong>of</strong> Irish origins who had children with African-American women. Shoshone (Black, White and Red)Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): nativesistergroup-Monday-yahoo.comGuest: Glendon ToddDate-Time: Friday, November 18, <strong>2005</strong> at 15:33:03 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: January <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Y-dna haplotype I (P19+) - actually the new Ix subhaplogroup (English - Norman).mtDNA haplogroup H1 (Irish). There was absolutely NO surprise in the results - and given that Iam by nature a cynic, this was in itself a bit <strong>of</strong> a surprise. I would have expected to see at least atrace <strong>of</strong> unknown admixture from somewhere, but apparently this is not the case.Email address (To use delete '-Friday-' and add @ sign in that position): glen-Friday-glentodd.netGuest: Beaugrand Jacques PierreGuest's Website: http://cerbere.caDate-Time: Monday, November 14, <strong>2005</strong> at 13:47:58 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 95, 0, 5, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 95, 0, 5, 0file:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (4 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong><strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Sep <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Y-DNA Haplogroup R1b3* per Y-SNP Testing. Results: We found you to be positiveat the following markers in the first screening panel: M168, M89, M9, M45, M207, M343. Butwere negative in this first panel: M96, M304, M175 (expected deletion) M122. Because <strong>of</strong> this, wetested you further on an additional panel. We found you to be positive at: P25 M269. But negativeat: M18, M37, M65, M126 (expected deletion) M153 SRY-2627. This would place you withinR1b3* . Tested by: DNAHeritage.com .Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): beaugrand.jacques-Monday-uqam.caGuest: J AdamsDate-Time: Saturday, November 12, <strong>2005</strong> at 19:04:43 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 95,0,5,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 87,0,13,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: June <strong>2005</strong>Comments: My 2.5 results <strong>of</strong> 13% NA were a bit higher than I thought. What really intrigued me,though, were my EuroDNA 1.0 results. I had considered that my results <strong>for</strong> the 87% Europeanportion <strong>of</strong> my results would break down as : 85% Northern European, 0% Middle Eastern, 15%Southeast European, and 0% South Asian. The actual breakdown <strong>of</strong> my 87% European scorewere: 26% Northern European, 11% Middle Eastern, 16% Southeast European, and 47% SouthAsian.Email address (To use delete '-Saturday-' and add @ sign in that position): jda74-Saturday-hotmail.comGuest: Jennie JimenezDate-Time: Sunday, October 30, <strong>2005</strong> at 20:00:21 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 79, 11, 10, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Dec 31 2003Comments: The Native American and East Asian results were a surprise to me. My prior researchindicated my ancestry was all European from Spain in the 1500s. My YDNA Result is J-2(Father's Line). My MTDna results is H-3 (Mother's Line). My Grand Father on Mother side is K-2 (YDNA). My Great-Grandfather on my Mothers side is G-2 (YDNA). My Grand Mother on myFathers side is U5b (MTDNA)Email address (To use delete '-Sunday-' and add @ sign in that position): jenniejimenez-Sunday-aol.comGuest: Melba Lambert StraigisDate-Time: Thursday, October 27, <strong>2005</strong> at 17:41:19 (CDT)file:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (5 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 68, 0, 32, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 76, 4, 20, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 25 July 2003Comments: My Haplogroup is "L1" which shows on the FamilyTreeDNA mtDNA MigrationsMap as originating in the most southern part <strong>of</strong> the African Continent 120,000 - 150,000 years ago.I have been unable to detect exactly where all <strong>of</strong> the Native American (American Indian) bloodcomes from, but since most <strong>of</strong> my 32 great grandparents were born here in the AmericanColonies, I suspect there were plenty <strong>of</strong> opportunities.Email address (To use delete '-Thursday-' and add @ sign in that position): melba-Thursday-innet.comGuest: H.LIMBDate-Time: Monday, October 24, <strong>2005</strong> at 15:49:29 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 95,1,4,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 92,8,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 4/12/05Comments: H.Limb <strong>DNAPrint</strong> test 2.5 version ordered 4/12/05 my expected results IE 95, EA 1,NA 4, SA my actual results were IE 92, EA 8, NA 0, SA 0 It wouldn't have suprised me if my testcame back 100% IE since I am 2/3 English and 1/3 German and Swedish. I've been told <strong>of</strong> verysmall NA admixture in family but have no pro<strong>of</strong> what so ever. Where does the 8% EA admixturecome from since I'm only a 1/3 German and Swedish. English people from the Isle usually don'thave any EA admixture. So the 8%EA seems a little highEmail address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): ALIMBECK-Monday-CHEMEKETA.EDU.COMGuest: Jen KingDate-Time: Friday, October 21, <strong>2005</strong> at 21:22:13 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 98, 1, 1, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 96, 0, 4, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 9 September <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Extensive genealogical research shows no specific indication <strong>of</strong> NA, but I have alwayssuspected that I might have NA ancestors due to the times and locations where they lived. Bothsides <strong>of</strong> the family are largely <strong>of</strong> colonial stock and have lived in areas with NA populations (oneancestor was adopted by the Powhatans as a child in order to learn their language). People have<strong>of</strong>ten commented that I look NA and I was even approached about a scholarship based on myappearance (<strong>of</strong> course I declined it). I will more actively seek in<strong>for</strong>mation about those ancestorswho I feel are most likely candidates to have been NA. I suspect there is more than one source, asboth sides <strong>of</strong> my family have had opportunity and express some physical characteristics whichhint at this. I am asking both my parents to test to see if we can narrow it down and rule out thefile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (6 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>possibility <strong>of</strong> error.Email address (To use delete '-Friday-' and add @ sign in that position): fenix-Friday-hawaii.rr.comGuest: Tom KingeryDate-Time: Friday, October 14, <strong>2005</strong> at 23:51:46 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 98,0,2,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 92,8,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: August 05Comments: Family is approx. 60 per cent "Black Dutch" and have at least 3 lines that claimNative American. Have traced my lineage thoroughly on all lines and there is no evidence <strong>of</strong> EastAsian anywhere. Some say the EA and NA markers are getting crossed. My results showed 11failed markers, but Gene Tree and DNA Print both refused to retest unless I paid <strong>for</strong> the entireamount again (I even <strong>of</strong>fered to pay half). They said if I would have had 15 failed markers thenthey would retest. I guess I will wait <strong>for</strong> a newer version and in the mean time do my Y test andMtDNA.Email address (To use delete '-Friday-' and add @ sign in that position): jam22960-Friday-aol.comGuest: J.WDate-Time: Friday, October 07, <strong>2005</strong> at 00:55:45 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 5,0,2,93My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 7,0,0,93<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: September <strong>2005</strong>Comments: This is the result <strong>of</strong> my sister my results are already posted and I stated in my firstpost that I had suspected that there was IE in my background but it did not show in my DNA testand my results was SA 93 and NA 3. However there was a 7% European in my sister's. She didnot show any NA. I will be doing 2 <strong>of</strong> my other sister to get a clearer picture.Email address (To use delete '-Friday-' and add @ sign in that position): annc000-Friday-sympatico.caGuest: James KingDate-Time: Tuesday, October 04, <strong>2005</strong> at 20:58:23 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 94, 0, 6, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 87, 0, 13, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: September <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Jim has an oral tradition from his mother's side <strong>of</strong> the family <strong>of</strong> Cherokee/Quakerroots in Guil<strong>for</strong>d, NC and Grayson, VA in the late 1700s-early 1800s. Many related families (COX,EDWARDS, MELTON, BEDSOLE, LEWIS) migrated west together out <strong>of</strong> this area, so thehigher degree than expected could be due to this. Also, his father's side (believed to be Welsh andGerman) is not entirely known, so some could be from that side. Family photos and some livingfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (7 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>relatives show a Native American phenotype, some members more than others. Jim is fairer andhas light eyes, unlike many <strong>of</strong> his relatives, so one would not likely say he "looks" NativeAmerican. No other family members have yet been tested but we are hoping to convince them.Email address (To use delete '-Tuesday-' and add @ sign in that position): fenix-Tuesday-hawaii.rr.comGuest: John Tyler CarlsonDate-Time: Saturday, September 24, <strong>2005</strong> at 16:32:59 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 75, 4, 21, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 30 August <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Corrected entry.Email address (To use delete '-Saturday-' and add @ sign in that position): tyler61958-Saturday-aol.comGuest: Dean MoulopoulosDate-Time: Wednesday, September 14, <strong>2005</strong> at 18:44:06 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 50 NOR(NE), 20 MED(SE), 20ME,10SAMy Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 60 NOR(NE), 20MED(SE),10ME, 10SA<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: Euro 1.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: September 2004Comments: I actually didn't have a clear estimate <strong>of</strong> results be<strong>for</strong>e I took the Euro 1.0 test. I am <strong>of</strong>Greek ancestry, and my MED(SE) result is low <strong>for</strong> Greeks. I have light pigmented and darkpigmented (relatively speaking) family members. Some <strong>of</strong> my family members look like theybelong to different subraces. I thought, perhaps, that I would have more MED(SE) and/orMIDEAS(ME) than was shown in my results. Perhaps because <strong>of</strong> mixing <strong>of</strong> different phenotypes,my family's results may be varied; we each may have different proportions <strong>of</strong> Euro 1.0 groups.We could be imperfectly mixed--each person showing different proportions <strong>of</strong> each group.Email address (To use delete '-Wednesday-' and add @ sign in that position): dmoulopoulos-Wednesday-ameritech,netGuest: LPDate-Time: Tuesday, September 13, <strong>2005</strong> at 12:00:11 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: EA 50 IE 50My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: EA 50, IE 50<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5 1Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: June <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Exactly as we suspected. British Isles European (Welsh) only <strong>for</strong> YDNA and EastAsian only <strong>for</strong> mtDNA. We have many exact dna matches in Ireland, which is weird as familyfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (8 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>history says nothing <strong>of</strong> Ireland. Either they are actually Welsh, or we are really Irish.Email address (To use delete '-Tuesday-' and add @ sign in that position): AbigailJaneMarlow-Tuesday-yahoo.comGuest: CWCDate-Time: Saturday, September 10, <strong>2005</strong> at 21:10:17 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 94, 0, 6, 0,My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 97,0, 3, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: July <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I expected a bit more Native American but was not positive since my grandmotherwas adopted. Her presumed parents were said to have been about 1/4 Native American each, butthose numbers are questionable. My maternal side appears to be 100% European within thesignificant timeframe. I had two failed markers on this test, but I don't know if these wouldchange the results. My MtDNA haplogroup is T1, and my father's is U4. I have about 25 HVR2exact matches and hundreds on the HVR1. My father, however, has no matches on either region,and I haven't found any close matches to his on the various MtDNA databases.Email address (To use delete '-Saturday-' and add @ sign in that position): catcoop-Saturdaybellsouth.netGuest: LaurieDate-Time: Wednesday, September 07, <strong>2005</strong> at 21:05:16 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 85, 15, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 95, 5, 0, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Summer <strong>2005</strong>Comments: As my father's family were from Russia/Eastern Europe, and I am <strong>of</strong>ten asked if I ampart Asian, I was not surprised about the 5% East Asian results. In view <strong>of</strong> what I look like, I didexpect it to be a little higher, like 10% or 15%.Email address (To use delete '-Wednesday-' and add @ sign in that position): webpoet1-Wednesday-aol.comGuest: Anthony PhillipsDate-Time: Monday, September 05, <strong>2005</strong> at 09:38:40 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 96, 1, 3, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5 and Euro 1.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: May <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I took the Ancestry 2.5 test along with the EURO 1.0 test. Euro results were: NOR(NE)-28, MED(SE)-45, MIDEAS(ME)-14, SA-13. My Y-DNA Haplogroup is G (M201+). Father'sfamily is from Italy. Our surname is really FILIPPELLI. My Mtdna Haplogroup is T*. Mother'sfamily is from Greece.file:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (9 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): tonyp-Monday-aspi.netGuest: MarieDate-Time: Monday, September 05, <strong>2005</strong> at 00:19:07 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups:My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100 IE<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered:Comments: I obtained a result <strong>of</strong> 100% IE with ancestry by dna. I was expecting to see a smallamount <strong>of</strong> EA affliation just based on my apperence. I have high cheekbones, tilted eyes and awide nose the 100% IE surprised me and was rather disapointing. However my confidencecontours showed the possibility <strong>of</strong> NA and EA affliation. I also obtained 8 failed Loci. Consideringthis accounts <strong>for</strong> part <strong>of</strong> my genetics I was thinking <strong>of</strong> taking the test over. I am only 16 and amnew to the world <strong>of</strong> genetics. When tests have been taken over due to failed loci, is it common toobtain a different result?I took ancestry by dna 2.5. If anyone has any info on this. Please e-mailme.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): tajmahalgirl-Mondayhotmail.comGuest: Rachel FairDate-Time: Friday, September 02, <strong>2005</strong> at 18:19:50 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 25, 0, 5, 70My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 34, 0, 13, 53<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 2 May <strong>2005</strong>Comments: mtDNA-L1 The I-E results were a bit higher than expected, but my gg-father was thechild <strong>of</strong> a slave owner and one <strong>of</strong> his slaves. In addition, my gg-father's wife was also <strong>of</strong> mixedheritage. The NA finding confirmed a previously suspected link in my paternal grandfathers'sheritage. The higher I-E also gives a clue to my father's mysterious and untalked about father inAlabama The appearance <strong>of</strong> my siblings range from a medium brown to a white coloring andeverything in between. I now have new areas to explore in my research.Email address (To use delete '-Friday-' and add @ sign in that position): raf620-Friday-aol.comGuest: WSPDate-Time: Monday, August 08, <strong>2005</strong> at 21:17:17 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 60, 0, 15, 25My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 56, 0, 2, 42<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: June <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I am 100% Puerto Rican. My guesses on my admixture were based mostly on how meand my family looks, and knowledge <strong>of</strong> the history <strong>of</strong> Puerto Rico. I also had been told by mymaternal grandmother that two <strong>of</strong> her great grandparents (husband/wife) were born as slaves onfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (10 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>some British caribbean island and at somepoint ended up free and in Puerto Rico. She didn'tknow if they had escaped, bought their freedom, been given their freedom or what. Also, I think Imight have been swayed to inflate my NA guess by Martinez-Cruzado's study showing 60% <strong>of</strong>Puerto Ricans have Native American mtDNA. I am suprised that I am more African and less NAthan I thought. I have a very light brown complection--that in Puerto Rico we call white--withfreckles, and have dark brown wavy/slightly curly kinda frizzy hair. Out <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> my cousins, meand 2 others are the only very light brown ones (in PR we call our complextion white). The other30 or so are all varied shades <strong>of</strong> medium to dark brown (we call that trigueno), including mybrother. One cousin is really dark and calls herself "la Negra." Our hair varies from bone straightto moderatly tight curls without regard to skin color. I assumed that because I have lots <strong>of</strong>medium brown skinned cousins with straight hair that I would be more NA. My dad's family isfrom Rio Piedras. My maternal grandfather is from Morovis. My maternal grandmother is fromBayamon, but her mom was from Lares and her dad was from Toa Baja. Que viva Puerto Rico!Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): wsalgado-Monday-wisc.eduGuest: Lynne YDate-Time: Monday, July 11, <strong>2005</strong> at 18:08:22 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0 , 0, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 16 June <strong>2005</strong>Comments: My father was adopted so I was interested to have some clues about his genealogy.The family lore is that is was Scandanavian. This test shows that I cannot rule out that possibility.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): lynnettebean-Mondayyahoo.comGuest: Grandmother <strong>of</strong> SLDate-Time: Wednesday, July 06, <strong>2005</strong> at 22:31:16 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 50, 0, 50, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 52, 21, 25, 2<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: May <strong>2005</strong>Comments: These are the results <strong>of</strong> my paternal Grandmother's DNA sample. (My results arebelow under Guest "SL"). The test indicating IE affiliation was almost identical to the expectedresults. However, I was expecting that the test would show up around 50% NA. Interesting thatthe test should come up 25% NA and 21% EA, instead <strong>of</strong> 50% NA (25% added to 21% is 46%,which is close to 50%). My paternal Grandmother is <strong>of</strong> known half Spanish and Portuguese andhalf Native American (Pueblo Tribes), and we have paper documentation <strong>of</strong> this side <strong>of</strong> my familygoing back to the 1700s. It is highly unlikely that she is <strong>of</strong> East Asian descent. The 21% EA is mostlikely Native American, based on the low genetic distance between Native Americans and EastAsians (as published on the AncestrybyDNA website). It also says on the website that there werefile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (11 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>later waves <strong>of</strong> migrations from Asia to the Americas, which might show up on the test as "EastAsian", but is really a later migratory wave, like the Na-Dene peoples such as the Navajo andApache. It’s possible that the 21% East Asian in my Grandmother could be evidence <strong>of</strong> Navajo orApache admixture with the Pueblo. Also interesting, is that my test was consistent with theknowledge <strong>of</strong> my Grandmother being 50% Native American (my expected NA was 12.5% and Itested <strong>for</strong> 16%). Additionally, I do have known East Asian (Filipino) descent from my paternaland maternal Grandfathers, NOT from my paternal and maternal Grandmothers. It could be thatmy results were more ‘accurate’ because I have both recent East Asian AND Native Americanancestry, and the test was better able to distinguish between the two. If my paternal Grandmotheris really 25% NA and 21% EA instead <strong>of</strong> 50% NA, it would make sense that my DNA test wouldshow up with less NA and more EA, which it did not. The test is apparently confusing NA with EAand vise versa. It seems very common, judging by the numerous other posts on this website bypeople who have known Native American descent, but come up with East Asian results. I amawaiting my Grandmother’s MtDNA results which I will post as soon as they are sent out.Email address (To use delete '-Wednesday-' and add @ sign in that position): dfc1-Wednesdayearthlink.netGuest: SLDate-Time: Wednesday, July 06, <strong>2005</strong> at 22:24:36 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 38, 50, 12, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 34, 48, 16, 2<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: November 2004Comments: Y-DNA paternal line = Haplogroup C. MtDNA maternal line = Haplogroup U5a1a.The results <strong>of</strong> the 2.5 test were very close to my expected results. I have read that people with NAor Mediterranean IE test <strong>for</strong> small amounts <strong>of</strong> SSAF, so the SSAF showing up is not that much <strong>of</strong>a surprise. The 2.5 test seemed to be accurate, as it rather accurately represented my ethnicbackground. Both my maternal and paternal grandfathers are 100% Filipino, I have a maternalgrandmother who is 100% German and a paternal grandmother who is 50% Spanish andPortuguese and 50% Native American (Pueblo Tribes). Both my parents have 'mixed' ancestry, asdo I. This made me 50% Filipino (25% from Father, 25% from Mother), 25% German (fromMother), 12.5% Spanish and Portuguese and 12.5% Native American-Pueblo Tribes (fromFather). When you add it all up (50% EA, 37.5% IE, 12.5% NA), it is very close to the results <strong>of</strong>the 2.5 test (48% EA, 34% IE, 16% NA, 2% SSAF). I had taken the 2.0 test a few months earlierand received very different results. The 2.5 test was accurate within 2%-3.5% <strong>of</strong> my expectedresults as compared to the 2.0 test which was accurate within 8%-10.5% <strong>of</strong> my expected results.Based on the results <strong>of</strong> both the 2.5 and 2.0 tests, I believe that the 2.5 is more accurate than the2.0.Email address (To use delete '-Wednesday-' and add @ sign in that position): dfc1-Wednesdayearthlink.netGuest: Patricia Newellfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (12 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>Date-Time: Wednesday, July 06, <strong>2005</strong> at 14:22:54 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100, 0, 0, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 95, 0, 5, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5 and Euro 1Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: June 1, <strong>2005</strong>Comments: On the Euro DNA 1.0 test, I tested 59 NOR(NE), 37 MED(SE), 4 MIDEAS(ME), 0 SA.I am wondering how to interpet the 37% MED(SE) and the 4% MIDEAS(ME). I was adopted atbirth by a Jewish father and a Christian mother. I was raised Christian. Could my results indicatethat I have Jewish ancestry?Email address (To use delete '-Wednesday-' and add @ sign in that position): NuHomes-Wednesday-aol.comGuest: Sue Marie MillsDate-Time: Tuesday, June 28, <strong>2005</strong> at 17:41:47 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 80,0,15,5My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100,0,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 23 May <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I was very suprised by the results in that it did not show any NA as family oral anddocumented history said that my grandmother's father was Cheorkee Indian. I was also suprisedthat there was not any SSAF as a book was recently published by Billy Higgins titled " A Strangerand a Sojourner" that states my g-g-grandfather was a black freeman from South Carolina. Thisbook has hundreds <strong>of</strong> source documents that indicate Peter Caulder was <strong>of</strong> black heritage. I wouldthink that with these source documents that the test would reflect this. Don't know what to do nextexcept maybe have test done <strong>for</strong> my brother and sisters or cousins. Any advice is appreciated.Email address (To use delete '-Tuesday-' and add @ sign in that position): kvwinery-Tuesday-aol.comGuest: Warren BoundsDate-Time: Monday, June 27, <strong>2005</strong> at 10:42:50 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 88, 0, 12, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 73, 27, 0, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 2003-2004Comments: Haplogroup= U2 I was totally surprised with the EA results! Warren Bounds is myGrandfather and the person whose markers are here. I as well as my Mother & Father took theDNA Print test also. When I received them all in the mail I opened mine first; 96%IE, 4%EA.Shocked but such a small amount I assumed this must be a mistake. Next I opened my mothers;100%IE My Dad's; 93%IE, 7%EA. I thought it could still be a mistake. My Grandfather WarrenBounds: 73%IE, 27%EA. Shocked!! But feeling it must be so. Where in the world did this comein?? Chinese, Japanese or What!!? I have been doing family research <strong>for</strong> many years, no unusualnames at all. I searched in NA records some because although no pro<strong>of</strong> yet, it must be therefile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (13 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>somewhere with all <strong>of</strong> the oral history. With names like Ross, Ward, Campbell etc. in myGrandfathers maternal line. I've never found any documents to prove NA, although I have foundwhere lines associated with his mothers people did apply <strong>for</strong> citizenship. Among these Choctaw,Cherokee, Creek and Chickasaw.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): dmodrall-Mondayvalornet.comGuest: Lesa J.Date-Time: Sunday, June 26, <strong>2005</strong> at 13:45:23 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: NOR(NE)=100, MIDEAS(ME)=0,MED(SE)=0, SA=0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: NOR(NE)=85, MIDEAS(ME)=10, MED(SE)=5, SA=0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: Euro 1.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: March <strong>2005</strong>Comments: 14 markers shown FL on the Euro-DNA test. Had no idea <strong>of</strong> the breakdown prior totesting. Oral and written family history confirms mainly Scottish, Irish, and Native Americanancestors on both my maternal and paternal sides.Email address (To use delete '-Sunday-' and add @ sign in that position): Synduhr-Sundaypost<strong>of</strong>fice.ccis.comGuest: RALDate-Time: Tuesday, June 21, <strong>2005</strong> at 22:15:33 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 80,0,0,20My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 75,2,10,13<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: March 21, <strong>2005</strong>Comments: Slightly surprised at NA results, but there is family lore about NA roots. I would liketo hear how in<strong>for</strong>mative the Euro-DNA test is.Email address (To use delete '-Tuesday-' and add @ sign in that position): andy_lien-Tuesdayhotmail.comGuest: DEJDate-Time: Sunday, May 29, <strong>2005</strong> at 01:34:22 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 60, 0, 6, 34My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 48, 9, 0, 43<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: March <strong>2005</strong>Comments: A little surprised at my 2.5 results. I expected a higher IE, since my mother is Indo-European and a native <strong>of</strong> Spain, her father being Basque and her mother an Andalusian Spaniard.I too am a native <strong>of</strong> Spain, but paternaly, my father, a native <strong>of</strong> Louisiana, is predominately black(65%) with an admixture <strong>of</strong> white (25%) and based on family lore, about 10% Choctaw. I guessfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (14 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>my biggest surprise was registering 9% EA. I have paper history on my mother's side back to themid 1600's and on my father's side to mid 1700's and there is no indication <strong>of</strong> any Asian familymembers. All I can think <strong>of</strong> is that the EA was really NA or that one <strong>of</strong> my father's gggrandfather's,who was Prussian, had an admixture <strong>of</strong> asian, although that may have been toolong ago to account <strong>for</strong> all the 9%, so maybe it was a combination <strong>of</strong> the two.Email address (To use delete '-Sunday-' and add @ sign in that position): xasd-Sunday-earthlink.netGuest: CFKGuest's Website: http://www.kerchner.com/dnaprint-euro1.0.htmDate-Time: Friday, May 27, <strong>2005</strong> at 00:33:33 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100% N EuropeMy Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 55% N Europe, 25%MidEast, 20% MED(SE) S Europe(Med)<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: Euro 1.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Mar <strong>2005</strong>Comments: My ancestry is PA Deutsch going back to colonial Pennsylvania immigrants fromGerman speaking areas in the Rhine River basin. I have no known Middle Eastern orSoutheastern European (Mediterranean) ancestry in my family oral history or in my 30 years <strong>of</strong>traditional genealogical research going back 250 to 500 years on all the various branches <strong>of</strong> myancestry chart. The sources <strong>of</strong> the Middle Eastern and Southeastern European (Mediterranean)markers must be very old or ancient.Email address (To use delete '-Friday-' and add @ sign in that position): charles-Friday-kerchner.comGuest: HeidiDate-Time: Sunday, May 22, <strong>2005</strong> at 11:22:07 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: ?,50,?,?My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 45,36,19,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: April 3rd, <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I know my mother was full-blooded Chinese, from western China, so there was verylittle chance she was mixed with anything else. The 36% EA is the first confusing thing, since Ithought it would be a sure thing to be 50 %. I don't know my birth father except that I know mymother liked euro-american men, so I expected some European. I don't know what to make <strong>of</strong> the19% NA, since I can't confirm it in any way, and I know that NA and EA are easily confused inthis test. Is 14% <strong>of</strong> the 19 really EA, making up the 50% EA? That would leave only 5% NA,which is inconclusive. Overall, I find these results are confusing and a bit disappointing. I am stillsearching <strong>for</strong> my birth father.Email address (To use delete '-Sunday-' and add @ sign in that position): blissing-Sunday-earthlink.netGuest: Cinda Meeksfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (15 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>Date-Time: Sunday, May 15, <strong>2005</strong> at 18:46:49 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: IE,EA,NA,SSAF Expectations were95, 0,5,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: IE,EA, NA, SSAF were, 99,0, 0, 1<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 26 Febuary <strong>2005</strong>Comments: I expected to be about 5% NA due to family lore, but did not expect the 1% SSAF.But, my paternal YDNA is J2, so the 1% SSAF could be Morrocan. Or, it could be noise. I do planto purchase the Euro 1.0 test in the near future.Email address (To use delete '-Sunday-' and add @ sign in that position): bigalspal-Sunday-charter.netGuest: Doug McDonaldGuest's Website: http://www.scs.uiuc.edu/~mcdonaldDate-Time: Saturday, May 07, <strong>2005</strong> at 10:05:15 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100,0,0,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 97,3,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: July 2004Comments: I expected 100 IE, or perhaps up to 5% NA or SSAF from an admixture in early 19thcentury Alabama. The 3% EA is actually meaningless, as the error contours are quite symmetricin the NA and EA directions. I'm probably actually 100% IE.Email address (To use delete '-Saturday-' and add @ sign in that position): mcdonald-Saturday-scs.uiuc.eduGuest: K.S.T.Date-Time: Monday, April 25, <strong>2005</strong> at 16:42:10 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100.0.0.0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 94,0,0,6<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: Euro-Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: march <strong>2005</strong>Comments: i was not shocked to see the SSAF as 6% as it is on the threshold <strong>of</strong> statictical noise orjust common to have 3-7% SSAF in most europeans combine that with 5 generations <strong>of</strong> photosand all the children in the families look like the fathers and 3/4 are germans and baltic germans. ican conclude its eather small percentages in most <strong>of</strong> my family or statistical noise. i really had noclue that i was 48% MED. i have a romanian great great grandmother and lappish great greatgrandfather but the rest are germans on both sides and i am a second generation american. myeurodna test said 52% NOR(NE) Northern European, 48% MED(SE) Mediterranean, 0% SASouth East Asian, O% ME middle eastern. perhaps the MED is from the baltic side mixing withrussians. though my grandfather would not be com<strong>for</strong>table with knowing i said that. he would sayit's my fathers side not your mothers. LOLfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (16 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): bloodredtop-Mondaymsn.comGuest: Lesa J.Date-Time: Monday, April 25, <strong>2005</strong> at 11:29:54 (CDT)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 80, 0, 20, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 90, 7, 0, 3<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Feb. <strong>2005</strong>Comments: My family is <strong>of</strong> European (Scottish,Irish,possibly German) and Native Americandescent. (Confirmed through genealogical and family oral history research.) I was surprised to seea negative result in the NA group. The results <strong>of</strong> 7 % EA and 3% SSAF were quite unexpected.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): Synduhr-Mondaypost<strong>of</strong>fice.ccis.comGuest: David MeeksDate-Time: Saturday, April 02, <strong>2005</strong> at 15:22:50 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 94, 0, 6, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 94, 6, 0, 0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Feb <strong>2005</strong>Comments: There was no surprise that I am 94% Indo-European. But I do question the 6% EA asI have no Asian genealogy. However, I do have NA ancestry & believe the results should read IE94%, EA 0%, NA 6%, & SSAF 0%. I will call AncestrybyDNA on Monday, & ask them toexplain.Email address (To use delete '-Saturday-' and add @ sign in that position): bigalspal-Saturdaycharter.netGuest: James V. ElliottGuest's Website: http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~gallgaedhil/elliott_border_reivers_dna.htmDate-Time: Tuesday, March 22, <strong>2005</strong> at 19:49:00 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> Northern-Europe(NOR), S-E Europe(MED), Mid-Eastern(MIDEAS),South-Asian(SA) Population Groups: 90,5,5,0My Actual Results <strong>for</strong> Northern-Europe(NOR), S-E Europe(MED), Mid-Eastern(MIDEAS),South-Asian(SA) Population Groups: 62,22,16,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: EuroDate <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: December 2004Comments: My paternal grandparents were born in Donegal <strong>of</strong> Anglo-Scottish Border stock. Mymaternal grandfather was born in London, with roots exclusively in the Northern and CentralMidlands <strong>of</strong> England. My maternal grandmother was descended from New England Puritansfrom East Anglia, New Jersey Dutchmen, Penn Dutch, and Delaware Valley Swedes. Hence, I wasfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (17 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>surprised by my <strong>DNAPrint</strong> 2.0 results, which suggested that I was 89 percent Indo-European, and11 percent East Asian. I never seriously believed I was descended from actual "East Asians" -most less from Native Americans - and assumed that this Asiatic 11 percent was <strong>of</strong> ancient CentralAsian origin - perhaps Finno-Ugrian - that had found its way into both European and East Asianpopulations thousands <strong>of</strong> years ago. When I took <strong>DNAPrint</strong> 2.5, my Indo-European ancestry wascorrected to 100 percent, which I would have expected the first time around. I took the Euro-DNA1.0 test to see how "white bread" I really was, expecting about 90 percent "Northern European".Instead, the test pegged me as only 62 percent "Northern European" - 20 to 25 percent less than<strong>for</strong> the "average" Northern European or Irishman, according to AncestryByDNA's charts. I wasalso 22 percent Southeastern European, and 16 percent Middle Eastern. This does not come as atotal surprise. My "trueborn English" grandfather had curly black hair, an aquiline nose, oliveskin, and a short, wiry build, while my Irish grandfather - according to the only photo I have <strong>of</strong>him - could have walked the streets <strong>of</strong> Kabul without attracting attention. My Y-DNA haplotype,although R1b, has a DYS393 value <strong>of</strong> 12, which is more typical <strong>of</strong> R1b in Anatolia, Syria,Armenia, Macedonia and other such places, than <strong>of</strong> R1b in the British Isles. I had recently begunto think that this geographical resemblance was simply an accident, an illusion created by a single1 step mutation. Now, considering that 38 percent <strong>of</strong> my DNA appears to come from that samegeneral area, it no longer seems infeasible that my Y-DNA could, too. Also, considering that 90percent <strong>of</strong> my "known" ancestry lies in England and Southern Scotland, my relatively highpercentages <strong>of</strong> Southeastern European and Middle Eastern DNA lend credence to my contentionthat the Anglo-Scottish Border folk (the Border Reivers, to wit) are at least partly descended fromRoman troops and settlers, many <strong>of</strong> whom came from the Mediterranean and the Middle East,and who manned Hadrian's Wall and the <strong>for</strong>tresses <strong>of</strong> North Britain at a time when that regionwas conspicuously underpopulated.Email address (To use delete '-Tuesday-' and add @ sign in that position): jvance-Tuesday-tiac.netGuest: B.J. HawesDate-Time: Tuesday, March 22, <strong>2005</strong> at 14:42:33 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> Northern-Europe(NOR), S-E Europe(MED), Mid-Eastern(MIDEAS),South-Asian(SA) Population Groups: 100,0,0,0My Actual Results <strong>for</strong> Northern-Europe(NOR), S-E Europe(MED), Mid-Eastern(MIDEAS),South-Asian(SA) Population Groups: 50,35,5,10<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: EuroDate <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Jan <strong>2005</strong>Comments: My results are a bit surprizing , I thought I would be 100% Northern-European onthe Euro 1.0 test . However , Im adopted & have very little background in<strong>for</strong>mation . Veryinteresting results.Email address (To use delete '-Tuesday-' and add @ sign in that position): jaysart-Tuesdaysympatico.caGuest: Leora J DobbsDate-Time: Monday, March 14, <strong>2005</strong> at 10:13:02 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 94,0,6,0file:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (18 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 92,0,8,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 31 December 2004Comments: Was basically interested in NA content.Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): dobbsj-Monday-ionet.netGuest: Beverly Ann Lee DuffieldDate-Time: Thursday, February 17, <strong>2005</strong> at 20:18:14 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 90, 0, 10, 0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 86, 10, 0, 4<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 12/13/2004Comments: MtDNA maternal line haplogroup I. I was very surprised to find 10% EA and a littlesurprised to find 4% SSAF and amazed that there was no NA at all. I was adopted by my paternalgrandparents and was always told that my mothers family was small and dark. I too am the"black sheep" among the blue eyes <strong>of</strong> my paternal family and was presumed to be NA in part. Iresemble the Bannock Shoshone people. Then I got these tests done and am fairly confused. I'dlike to know how far back the EA is as I also have an unknown 16474T in the HVR1 that doesn'tshow up in the Concordance. However I understand that this test "lumps" all Y and MtDNAtogether. On the paternal line the paper trail is quite thorough and goes back to the 1600's andeven further and indicates purely European. Specifically Ireland, Prussia, Germany, England andThe Netherlands. Much <strong>of</strong> the paternal family has been in America since the earliest days. Mynext step will be to have my son tested and just see what happens.Email address (To use delete '-Thursday-' and add @ sign in that position): Duffield12345-Thursday-MSN.COMGuest: CSDDate-Time: Monday, February 07, <strong>2005</strong> at 13:09:55 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 80,?,?,?My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 90,10,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: feb <strong>2005</strong>Comments: mtDNA = Haplogroup H (half the people in the world!) I expected mostly, if not allEuropean. My mother's side is English, Irish, etc. nearly all the way back. Might be a nativeamerican 5-6 generations back but no one knows <strong>for</strong> sure. Since i am adopted, I do not knowmuch about my father's side <strong>of</strong> the family, except that he was probably pretty much like mymom's side. I was surprised to see the 10% east asian as opposed to native American. Now I readthat the 2 are almost impossible to distinguish. Why do they have a separate class <strong>for</strong> NativeAmerican then? I have also read other stories about people who claim that there is no way theycan have east asian. One story where 2 (proven) full brothers tested way different. One 7% EAand the other 12% NA, or something like that. Sounds like even the 2.5 test is not all that reliable.Has anyone there had the sub-clade test <strong>for</strong> Haplogroup H or the new EURO-DNA <strong>of</strong>f thefile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (19 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>DNAprint <strong>for</strong> European sub designations?Email address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): cdonnelltx-Mondayyahoo.comGuest: Steven WilliamsonGuest's Website: http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=gen_authorDate-Time: Saturday, January 22, <strong>2005</strong> at 19:41:33 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 98,0,0,2My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 86,0,8,6<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.5Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 30 September 2004Comments: Ancestry by DNA has added another feature to their web site: Geopolitical Pr<strong>of</strong>ileMatch. I went ahead & signed up (it's free). You can put in your percentages on the 2.5 test & seewho else got these results. No big surprises. No one got the exact percentages I did, apparently, butwithin my 2x less likely range, I mostly matched Europeans. Their database promises to expand.Email address (To use delete '-Saturday-' and add @ sign in that position): w_s_arthur-Saturdayyahoo.comGuest: Roxanne PendletonDate-Time: Monday, January 17, <strong>2005</strong> at 13:54:32 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 90,0,10,0My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 100,0,0,0<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Version Number: 2.0Date <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: Feb. 2003Comments: Oral history that maternal grandmother partially Native American. Whole familyolive toned with high cheekbones. Somewhat surprised no N.A. ancestry foundEmail address (To use delete '-Monday-' and add @ sign in that position): Roxannepen-Mondayhotmail.comGuest: Steven WilliamsonGuest's Website: http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?db=gen_authorDate-Time: Sunday, January 09, <strong>2005</strong> at 08:00:41 (CST)My Expected Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 98,0,0,2My Actual <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Results <strong>for</strong> IE,EA,NA,SSAF Population Groups: 86,0,8,6<strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro Test add-on Version Number: <strong>DNAPrint</strong> 2.5 with Euro 1.0 add-on testDate <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test and/or Euro add-on Test Was Ordered: 30 September 2004Comments: This is a second follow-up to my post <strong>of</strong> November 24, 2004 (see below). Yesterday Iunexpectedly received a new Euro 1.0 CD-ROM from Ancestry by DNA, along with a letterexplaining why they had sent it. The results and graphs were identical, but they have changed thecategory name "Greek-Turkish" to "Southeastern European" <strong>for</strong> the Euro 1.0 test. I saw nochanges with the DNA Print 2.5 results, which are included on the CD-ROM with the Euro test.Email address (To use delete '-Sunday-' and add @ sign in that position): w_s_arthur-Sunday-yahoo.file:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (20 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM


<strong>2005</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> into <strong>Kerchner</strong>'s <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong>comLegend: IE=Indo-European, EA=East Asian, NA-Native American, SSAF=Sub-Saharan Africanpopulation groups.<strong>Read</strong> <strong>More</strong> <strong>DNAPrint</strong> <strong>Log</strong> <strong>Entries</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>Prior</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>of</strong> 2004Visitor <strong>Entries</strong> Last Reviewed and Edited by Webmaster: 31 Dec <strong>2005</strong>Visit My PA German, aka PA Dutch, Ethnic Group DNA Project SiteBack to <strong>DNAPrint</strong> Test Results <strong>Log</strong> Home PageCopyright © <strong>2005</strong>Charles F. <strong>Kerchner</strong>, Jr.All Rights Reservedfile:///D|/KERCHNER.COM/dnaprintlog<strong>2005</strong>.htm (21 <strong>of</strong> 21)3/8/2010 8:12:17 PM

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!