[1] S. Barsov, U. Bechstedt, W. Bothe, N. Bongers, G. Borchert, W. Borgs, W. Brautigam, M. Buescher,W. Cass<strong>in</strong>g, V. Chernyshev, B. Chiladze, J. Dietrich, M. Drochner, S. Dymov, W. Erven, R. Esser,A. Franzen, E.S. Golubeva, D. Gotta, T. Grande, D. Grzonka, A. Hardt, M. Hartmann, V. Hejny, L.v.Horn,L. Jarczyk, H. Junghans, A. Kacharava, B. Kamys, A. Khoukaz, T. Kirchner, F. Klehr, W. Kle<strong>in</strong>, H.R. Koch,V.I. Komarov, L. Kondratyuk, V. Koptev, S. Kopyto, R. Krause, P. Kravtsov, V. Kruglov, P. Kulessa,A. Kulikov, N. Lang, N. Langenhagen, A. Lepges, J. Ley, R. Maier, S. Mart<strong>in</strong>, G. Macharashvili,S. Merzlyakov, K. Meyer, S. Mikirtychyants, H. Muller, P. Munhofen, A. Mussgiller, M. Nekipelov,V. Nelyub<strong>in</strong>, M. Nioradze, H. Ohm, A. Petrus, D. Prasuhn, B. Prietzschk, H.J. Probst, K. Pysz,F. Rathmann, B. Rimarzig, Z. Rudy, R. Santo, H. Paetz gen.Schieck, R. Schleichert, A. Schneider,C. Schneider, H. Schneider, U. Schwarz, H. Seyfarth, A. Sibirtsev, U. Siel<strong>in</strong>g, K. Sistemich, A. Selikov,H. Stechemesser, H.J. Ste<strong>in</strong>, A. Strzalkowski, K.H. Watzlawik, P. Wustner, S. Yashchenko, B. Zalikhanov,N. Zhuravlev, K. Zwoll, I.. Zychor, O.W.B. Schult, H. Ströher, Nucl.Instrum. Meth. A462, 364 (2001)[2] V. Koptev, M. Buescher, H. Junghans, M. Nekipelov, K. Sistemich, H. Ströher, V. Abaev, H.-H. Adam,R. Baldauf, S. Barsov, U. Bechstedt, N. Bongers, G. Borchert, W. Borgs, W. Braeutigam, W. Cass<strong>in</strong>g,V. Chernyshev, B. Chiladze, M. Debowski, J. Dietrich, M. Drochner, S. Dymov, J. Ernst, W. Erwen,R. Esser, P. Fedorets, A. Franzen, D. Gotta, T. Grande, D. Grzonka, G. Hansen, M. Hartmann, V. Hejny,L.v.Horn, L. Jarczyk, A. Kacharava, B. Kamys, A. Khoukaz, T. Kirchner, F. Klehr, H.R. Koch,V.I. Komarov, S. Kopyto, R. Krause, P. Kravtsov, V. Kruglov, P. Kulessa, A. Kulikov, V. Kurbatov,N. Lang, N. Langenhagen, I. Lehmann, A. Lepges, J. Ley, B. Lorentz, G. Macharashvili, R. Maier,S. Mart<strong>in</strong>, S. Merzliakov, K. Meyer, S. Mikirtychyants, H. Mueller, P. Munhofen, A. Mussgiller,V. Nelub<strong>in</strong>, M. Nioradze, H. Ohm, A. Petrus, D. Prasuhn, B. Prietzschk, H.J. Probst, D. Protic, K. Pysz,F. Rathmann, B. Rimarzik, Z. Rudy, R. Santo, H. Paetz gen. Schieck, R. Schleichert, A. Schneider,Chr. Schneider, H. Schneider, G. Schug, O.W.B.Schult, H. Seyfarth, A. Sibirtsev, H. Stechemesser,H.J. Ste<strong>in</strong>, A. Strzalkowski, K.H. Watzlawik, C. Wilk<strong>in</strong>, P. Wuestner, S. Yashenko, B. Zalikhanov,N. Zhuravlev, P. Zolnierczuk, K. Zwoll, I. Zychor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 022301 (2001)[3] M. Buescher, H. Junghans, V. Koptev, M. Nekipelov, K. Sistemich, H. Ströher, S. Barsov, G. Borchert,W. Borgs, M. Debowski, W. Erven, R. Esser, P. Fedorets, D. Gotta, M. Hartmann, V. Hejny, A. Kacharava,H.R. Koch, V. Komarov, P. Kulessa, A. Kulikov, G. Macharashvili, S. Merzlyakov, S. Mikirtychyants,H. Muller, A. Mussgiller, R. Nellen, M. Nioradze, H. Ohm, A. Petrus, F. Rathmann, Z. Rudy,R. Schleichert, C. Schneider, O.W.B. Schult, H.J. Ste<strong>in</strong>, I. Zychor, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A481, 378 (2002)[4] I.Zychor, Acta Phys. Polon. B33, 521 (2002)[5] V. Kleber, M. Buescher, V. Chernyshev, S. Dymov, P. Fedorets, V. Grish<strong>in</strong>a, C. Hanhart, M. Hartmann,V. Hejny, A. Khoukaz, H.R. Koch, V. Komarov, L. Kondratyuk, V. Koptev, N. Lang, S. Merzliakov,S. Mikirtychyants, M. Nekipelov, H. Ohm, A. Petrus, D. Prasuhn, R. Schleichert, A. Sibirtsev, H.J. Ste<strong>in</strong>,H. Ströher, K.H. Watzlawik, P. Wustner, S. Yaschenko, B. Zalikhanov, I. Zychor, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91,172304 (2003)[6] I. Zychor, V. Koptev, M. Buescher, A. Dzyuba, I. Keshelashvili, V. Kleber, H.R. Koch, S. Krewald,Y. Maeda, S. Mikirtychyants, M. Nekipelov, H. Ströher, C. Wilk<strong>in</strong>, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 012002 (<strong>2006</strong>)174
NONMESONIC DECAY OF Λ - HYPERON IN HEAVY HYPERNUCLEIL.Jarczyk 1 , B.Kamys 1 , P.Kulessa 1,2 , K.Pysz 1,2 , Z.Rudy 1 , A.Strzałkowski 1 , I.Zychor 31 M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, Kraków2 H. Niewodniczański Institute of Nuclear Physics PAN, Kraków3 A. Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies, WarszawaExperimental facility: Cooler Synchrotron COSY, Forschungszentrum JuelichThe nonmesonic Λ-decay Λ+N → N+Nrepresents an example for the nonleptonic weak<strong>in</strong>teraction of baryons with a change ofstrangeness (∆S = 1) and isosp<strong>in</strong> (∆I = 1/2 or 3/2).The study of the nonmesonic decay, whichproceeds via a weak <strong>in</strong>teraction only (theCoulomb and strong <strong>in</strong>teractions preserve thestrangeness) allows to study both parity violat<strong>in</strong>gand parity conserv<strong>in</strong>g amplitudes <strong>in</strong> contrast toe.g. the nucleon-nucleon weak <strong>in</strong>teraction, wherethe latter amplitudes are completely masked bystrong and Coulomb forces. The only possibilityto study nonmesonic decay of Λ-hyperon is<strong>in</strong>vestigation of hypernuclei s<strong>in</strong>ce at presentneither beams nor targets of hyperons areavailable. Heavy hypernuclei are favorized forthis purpose, because another mode of the Λ-hyperon decay, i.e. Λ→π+N, which dom<strong>in</strong>atesdecay of free hyperons is strongly Pauli blockedfor all but the lightest hypernuclei. We report hereon the <strong>in</strong>vestigations of production and decay ofheavy hypernuclei <strong>in</strong> proton <strong>in</strong>teraction with Au,Bi, and U targets [1-9]. The experiments havebeen performed on the <strong>in</strong>ternal beam of COSYaccelerator <strong>in</strong> Forschungszentrum Juelich us<strong>in</strong>gproton beams of two energies: 1 GeV, which isbelow the threshold for Λ-hyperon production,and 1.5 or 1.9 GeV at which hyperons can beproduced. The th<strong>in</strong> targets of Au, Bi or U(thickness of order of 30 µg/cm 2 ) with th<strong>in</strong> carbonback<strong>in</strong>g [5] , placed <strong>in</strong> the circulat<strong>in</strong>g beam ofCOSY accelerator were bombarded with 1 GeVand 1.5 (1.9) GeV protons <strong>in</strong> the subsequentacceleration cycles. This allowed for backgroundmeasurement (at 1 GeV) and hypernucleusproduction (at higher energies ) under identicaltarget conditions. The recoil shadow metod hasbeen applied for measurement of lifetime ofheavy hypernuclei produced <strong>in</strong> p+Bi [4], p+Au [7]and p+U [8] reactions. Details of the experimentalsetup and procedure are described <strong>in</strong> Ref. [5]whereas properties of the produced hypernucleiand the probability of their production and decaywere subject of theoretical estimations <strong>in</strong> Refs.[1,2]. The follow<strong>in</strong>g lifetimes of the Λ-hyperonhave been obta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> the reported <strong>in</strong>vestigations:130±20 ps (Au target), 161±16 ps (Bi target) and138±18 ps (U target) giv<strong>in</strong>g the average value ofthe lifetime of Λ-hyperon <strong>in</strong> heavy hypernuclei145±11 ps, <strong>in</strong> excellent agreement with results ofstudies performed with antiprotons on Bi and Utargets ( Phys.Rev. C47, 1957 (1993) ) , i.e. 143±36ps, however, much more accurate. The lifetimesobta<strong>in</strong>ed from electron <strong>in</strong>duced production ofheavy hypernuclei on Bi and U targets ( Sov. J.Nucl. Phys 43, 856 (1986); 46, 769 (1987) ) areorder of magnitude larger. Our experiments cangive estimation on cross section of such longliv<strong>in</strong>g hypernuclei to be smaller than 80nanobarns whereas cross section for production ofhypernuclei with lifetime of about 145 ps wasfound to be ~ 350 microbarns.In summary, the performed experiments havelead to the most precise value of the lifetime of Λ -hyperons <strong>in</strong> very heavy nuclei known up to now.Fig.1. The lifetimes of proton- and antiproton-produced hypernucleion Au, Bi and U targets. The horizontal bars present the statisticaland systematic errors added <strong>in</strong> quadrature. The position and width ofthe yellow vertical bar display the overall average value for thelifetime and its error, respectively. The smooth curve was evaluatedadd<strong>in</strong>g Gaussian curves represent<strong>in</strong>g results from <strong>in</strong>dividualexperiments.175
- Page 3:
NUCLEAR PHYSICSIN POLAND1996-20063
- Page 6 and 7:
Report of Polish Nuclear Physics Ne
- Page 8 and 9:
4• The isoscalar bosons in nuclea
- Page 10 and 11:
6• Application of the Mössbauer
- Page 13 and 14:
POLISH NUCLEAR PHYSICS NETWORKJerzy
- Page 15 and 16:
Fig. 4. AIC-144, K=60 light particl
- Page 17:
OVERVIEW PAPERS13
- Page 20 and 21:
A successfulstudy on the decay ofpr
- Page 22 and 23:
visible light and a CCD camera will
- Page 24 and 25:
the heavy ion cyclotron up to an en
- Page 26 and 27:
investigated by means of ALICE and
- Page 28 and 29:
and/or baryon density of the nuclea
- Page 30 and 31:
Figure 5. Top: K - /K + ratio in Ni
- Page 32 and 33:
Acknowledgements: I would like to t
- Page 34 and 35:
7%6%5%4%3%2%1%0%8%7%6%5%4%3%2%1%0%E
- Page 37 and 38:
NUCLEAR PHYSICS IN POLAND - APPLICA
- Page 39 and 40:
Funds of the European Union foresee
- Page 41 and 42:
POSSIBLE LOCATION FOR THE UNDERGROU
- Page 43 and 44:
Fig. 5. Time dependence of maximume
- Page 45:
CONTRIBUTIONS41
- Page 48 and 49:
[1] K. Pomorski, B. Nerlo-Pomorska,
- Page 50 and 51:
[1] K. Pomorski and J. Dudek, Phys.
- Page 52 and 53:
[1] J. Jastrzębski, H. Daniel, T.
- Page 54 and 55:
[1] P.Adrich, A.Klimkiewicz, M. Fal
- Page 56 and 57:
[4] J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz,
- Page 58 and 59:
[1] A. Sobiczewski, F.A. Gareev, B.
- Page 60 and 61:
[1] R. Smolańczuk, Phys. Rev. C 56
- Page 62 and 63:
[1] W.J. Świątecki, K. Siwek-Wilc
- Page 64 and 65:
[1] J. Peter, N. Alamanos, N. Amar,
- Page 66 and 67:
[1] R. Broda, J. Phys. (London) G32
- Page 68 and 69:
1. J. Styczeń, J. Chevallier, B. H
- Page 70 and 71:
[1] E. Grodner, J. Srebrny, Ch. Dro
- Page 72 and 73:
[1] C.Plettner, L.Batist, J.Doring,
- Page 74 and 75:
[1] W. Kurcewicz, Hyperfine Interac
- Page 76 and 77:
[1] M. Sugawara, Y. Toh, T.Czosnyka
- Page 78 and 79:
[1] M.Loewe, J.de Boer, H.J.Maier,
- Page 80 and 81:
[1] S.G. Rohoziński, K. Starosta,
- Page 82 and 83:
[1] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski,
- Page 84 and 85:
[1] L.Próchniak, K.Zając, K.Pomor
- Page 86 and 87:
[1] J. Dobaczewski, J. Dudek, Comp.
- Page 88 and 89:
[1] W. Nazarewicz, J. Dobaczewski,
- Page 90 and 91:
[1] L. Próchniak, P. Quentin, D. S
- Page 92 and 93:
[1] K. Zając, Acta Phys. Pol. B34,
- Page 94 and 95:
[1] L. Próchniak, K. Zając, K. Po
- Page 96 and 97:
[1] A.Maj, M.Kmiecik, F.Camera, B.H
- Page 98 and 99:
[1] M.Kicińska-Habior, K.A.Snover,
- Page 100 and 101:
[1] P.Adrich, A.Klimkiewicz, M. Fal
- Page 102 and 103:
[1] K. Czerski, H. Bucka, P. Heide
- Page 104 and 105:
[1] C.R Bingham, M.N. Tantawy, J.C.
- Page 107 and 108:
NUCLEAR OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEM MANY-BO
- Page 109 and 110:
THREE-NUCLEON FORCE EFFECTS IN NUCL
- Page 111 and 112:
RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS IN THREE-NUCLE
- Page 113 and 114:
ELECTRON AND PHOTON SCATTERING ON T
- Page 115 and 116:
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THREE-NUCLE
- Page 117 and 118:
A SEARCH FOR MAJORANA NEUTRINOExper
- Page 119 and 120:
DOUBLE BETA DECAY MATRIX ELEMENTS I
- Page 121 and 122:
NEUTRINOLESS DOUBLE BETA DECAYIN SU
- Page 123 and 124:
FUSION BARRIER DISTRIBUTIONSP.Czosn
- Page 125 and 126:
NUCLEAR OPTICAL POTENTIAL FROM LIGH
- Page 127 and 128: REACTIONS WITH LOOSELY BOUND PROJEC
- Page 129 and 130: NEUTRON-INDUCED REACTIONSJ. Andrzej
- Page 131 and 132: NUCLEAR FUSION AND FISSION IN MEAN-
- Page 133 and 134: FISSION AND FUSION OF NUCLEI WITHIN
- Page 135 and 136: ENHANCED ELECTRON SCREENING IN DEUT
- Page 137 and 138: EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO HEAVY IO
- Page 139 and 140: HEAVY ION EXPERIMENTS AT LNS CATANI
- Page 141 and 142: HEAVY ION REACTION MECHANISMS AT FE
- Page 143 and 144: HARD PHOTONS FROM NUCLEUS-NUCLEUSAN
- Page 145 and 146: NEUTRAL MESON PRODUCTION AND BARYON
- Page 147 and 148: CORRELATIONS AND FLUCTUATIONS IN HE
- Page 149 and 150: MASS AND ISOTOPIC EFFECTS IN NUCLEA
- Page 151 and 152: NUCLEAR MATTER AT THE LIQUID-GAS PH
- Page 153 and 154: HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS: GEOMETRY AND
- Page 155 and 156: MULTIFRAGMENTATION IN HEAVY-ION COL
- Page 157 and 158: ULTRA-RELATIVISTIC REACTIONS BETWEE
- Page 159 and 160: INVESTIGATION OF HADRON PROPERTIES
- Page 161 and 162: SPALLATION AND FRAGMENTATION OF ATO
- Page 163 and 164: STRANGE-PARTICLE PRODUCTION IN NUCL
- Page 165 and 166: PHASE TRANSITIONS IN HIGHLY EXCITED
- Page 167 and 168: NUCLEAR SINGLE PARTICLE SUM RULES I
- Page 169 and 170: FLUCTUATIONS AND SEARCH FOR THE CRI
- Page 171 and 172: BETWEEN NUCLEAR AND ELEMENTARY INTE
- Page 173 and 174: INVESTIGATION OF CHARGE AND ISOSPIN
- Page 175 and 176: NUCLEAR STATES OF η, K MESONS, Σ
- Page 177: HYPERON RESONANCES PRODUCED IN PROT
- Page 181 and 182: INTERACTION OF THE η AND η΄ MESO
- Page 183 and 184: INVESTIGATION OF THE HYPERON-NUCLEO
- Page 185 and 186: η AND η΄ MESONS PRODUCTION IN D-
- Page 187 and 188: K+ PRODUCTION IN PROTON-NUCLEUS REA
- Page 189 and 190: INTERACTION OF K + K - MESONSJ. Bal
- Page 191 and 192: PRODUCTION OF K+ AND K- MESONS IN H
- Page 193 and 194: AT THE BORDER BETWEEN ATOMIC AND NU
- Page 195 and 196: ATOMIC PHYSICS IN HEAVY ION - ATOM
- Page 197 and 198: PRECISION TESTS OF THE STANDARD MOD
- Page 199 and 200: SEARCH FOR TIME REVERSAL VIOLATION
- Page 201 and 202: HIGH INTENSITY ULTRA-COLD NEUTRON S
- Page 203 and 204: NUCLEAR PHYSICS WITH ULTRACOLD ATOM
- Page 205 and 206: FORWARD SPECTROMETER FOR PANDAD. Gi
- Page 207 and 208: DESIGN STUDIES OF CHARMONIUM DETECT
- Page 209 and 210: ONLINE EVENT SELECTION IN THE CBM E
- Page 211 and 212: DEVELOPMENT OF A FAST DATA READOUT
- Page 213 and 214: NEW TECHNOLOGIES OF SILICON DETECTO
- Page 215 and 216: NUCLEAR REACTIONS IN THE ACCELERATI
- Page 217 and 218: NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY STUDIES IN SO
- Page 219 and 220: APPLICATION OF THE MÖSSBAUER SPECT
- Page 221 and 222: POSITRON ANNIHILATION LIFETIME SPEC
- Page 223 and 224: VALIDATION OF NUCLEAR DATA AND MODE
- Page 225 and 226: LOOK TO THE FUTURE: NUCLEARPHYSICS
- Page 227 and 228: LONG-RANGE PLAN OF POLISH NUCLEAR P
- Page 229 and 230:
225
- Page 231 and 232:
THE OUTLINE OF BUDGET EXPENDITUREST
- Page 233 and 234:
INSTITUTION AND AUTHORINDEXES229
- Page 235 and 236:
INSTITUTION INDEXAA. Sołtan Instit
- Page 237 and 238:
Kistryn, S, 111, 157, 169, 193, 195
- Page 239 and 240:
UNITS OF POLISH NUCLEAR PHYSICSNETW
- Page 241 and 242:
POLISH NUCLEAR PHYSICS NETWORKList
- Page 243 and 244:
LIST OF ELECTRONIC ADDRESSES239
- Page 245 and 246:
Nuclear Physics community in Poland
- Page 247 and 248:
Faculty of Physics and Applied Info
- Page 249 and 250:
Kurpeta Jan jkurpeta@mimuw.edu.plMa
- Page 251 and 252:
Gil Damian damian.gil@if.uj.edu.plG
- Page 253 and 254:
Nuclear Physics community in Poland
- Page 255 and 256:
Kopeć Mariusz AGH FPACS mariusz@no
- Page 257 and 258:
Rząca-Urban Teresa IEP UW rzaca@@f
- Page 259 and 260:
Białkowska Helena IPJ Helena.Bialk
- Page 261 and 262:
Krauze Maciej IP US meszik@nuph.us.
- Page 263 and 264:
Słowiński Bronisław PhF WUT slow
- Page 265 and 266:
AGH FPACS - AGH University of Scien