nuclear physics in poland 1996 â 2006

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[1] K. Pomorski, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, P. Ring, G. A. Lalazissis, A. Baran. Z. Łojewski, B. Nerlo-Pomorska,M. Warda, Nucl. Phys.A 624, 349 (1997)[2] M. Warda, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, Nucl. Phys. A635, 484 (1998)[3] M. Warda. B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, Acta Phys. Polon. B 30, 755 (1999)[4] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, J. F. Berger, Acta Phys. Polon. B 32, 925 (2001)[5] Z. Łojewski, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, J. Dudek, Acta Phys. Polon. B 32, 2981 (2001)[6] K. Mazurek, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, Acta Phys. Polon. B 32, 783 (2001)[7] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, J. F. Berger, Eur. Phys. Jour. A 8, 19 (2000)[8] M. Kleban, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, J. F. Berger, J. Decharge, Acta Phys. Polon. B 32, 1119(2001)[9] M. Kleban, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, .Annales UMCS, Sect. AAA, LV/LVI, 1 (2001)[10] M. Kleban, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, J. Berger, J. Decharge, J. Girod, S. Hilaire, Phys. Rev. C 65, 024309, 1(2002)[11] M. Kleban, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, J F. Berger, J. Decharge, Acta Phys. Polon. B 33, 383(2002)[12] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Mazurek, Phys. Rev. C 66, 064305, 1 (2002)[13] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Mazurek, M. Kleban, Acta Phys. Polon. B 34, 1777, 1 (2003)[14] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, J. Sykut, Acta Phys. Polon. B 35, 1299, 1 (2004)[15] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, Physica Scripta T 125, 26 (2006)[16] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, M. Zwierzchowska, Int. Journ. of Modern Phys. E 16, 276 (2007)[17] K. Pomorski, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, Physica Scripta T 125, 21 (2006)[18] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, Int. Journ. of Modern Phys. E 16, 130 (2007)[19] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, Int. Journ. of Modern Phys. E 15, 471 (2006)[20] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski, Int. Journ. of Modern Phys. E 16, 276 (2007)[21] K. Pomorski, Phys. Rev. C 70, 044306 (2004)[22] H. Molique, J. Dudek, K. Pomorski, Int. Journ. of Modern Phys. E 14, 499 (2005)[23] K. Pomorski, J. Dudek, Phys. Rev. C 67, 044316 (2003)44
MASSES AND FISSION BARRIERS OF ATOMIC NUCLEIK. Pomorski, B. Nerlo-Pomorska, A. Dobrowolski, K. Mazurek, M. WardaInstitute of Physics, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University, LublinTheoretical estimates of the masses of nucleiwhich are not far from stability agree well withthe measured data. Nevertheless the progressmade in experimental nuclear physics over thelast years, like discovery of superheavy nuclei orisotopes close to the proton or neutron drip-lines,demands for a more careful checking of thetheoretical model predictions and may lead tosome revision of its parameters.The recently developped Lublin-StrasbourgDrop (LSD) [1] model together with the Moellermicroscopic corrections [At. Data Nucl. Data Tab.59, 185 (1995)] is very successful in describingmany features of nuclei. In addition to theclassical liquid drop model the LSD contains thecurvature term proportional to the A^1/3. Itsparameters were adjusted to the bindings energiesof presently known 2766 [Isotope chart of M.Antony, Strasbourg 2002] with proton andneutron numbers larger or equal to 8. The r.m.s.deviation of the experimental binding energiesversus those predicted by the LSD model, equal to0.698 MeV, is smaller than the ones given by othermore elaborated theories like the finite-rangedroplet, the Thomas-Fermi model or old liquiddrop model of Myers and Swiatecki [Nucl. Phys.A601, 141 (1996); Ark. Phys. 36, 343 (1967)].The LSD estimates of binding energies ofnuclei which are far from the beta stability differsignificantly from the data predicted by the othermacroscopic-microscopic or selfconsistent models[2-4]. There is a hope that new experiments withthe radioactive beams will bring suffcient sampleof data in order to decide which model describesbetter the position of the proton and neutron driplines.It turns out that the liquid drop model whichin addition to the volume, surface and Coulombenergies contains just the first order curvatureterm gives not only a very good description of themasses but also a rather satisfactory prediction ofthe fission barrier heights. It is worth emphasizingthat all the parameters of the LSD model werefitted to the nuclear masses only and thus thecorrect reproduction of the barrier heights can beseen as an additional sign of the intrinsicconsistency of the model. The mean squaredeviation of the barrier heights from experimentis 3.56 MeV, but it decreases to only 0.88 MeVwhen the four lightest nuclei are disregarded i.e.when only the nuclei with Z>70 are considered.In addition it was found in Ref. [5] that takinginto account the deformation dependence of thecongruence energy significantly approaches thetheoretical LSD-model barrier-heights to theexperimental data in the case of the light isotopeswhile the fission barriers for heavy nuclei remainnearly unchanged and agree well withexperiment.Another important effect which influences thefission barrier heights is the assumtion, made inall type microscopic-macroscopic calculations,that the proton and neutron distributions have thesame deformations. It was shown in Ref. [6] onbasis of selfconsistent HFB calculations with theGogny force that such an effect can change thebarrier height estimates even by 1 MeV. Ageneralization of the macroscopic model wasproposed in Ref. [7], where the termcorresponding to the response of the system onthe change of the relative proton to neutrondeformation was derived using the ETFapproximation to the HF hamiltonian with theSkyrme force. Similar estimates made in theYukawa folded model were performed in Refs.[8,9] where the effect of the proton and neutrondeformation difference on the fission barrierheights was studied.Recently developped in Ref. [10] new shellcorrection method obtained by averaging in theparticle number space (not by smoothing thesingle energies as in the traditional Strutinskyprescription) predicts deeper minima for spericalnuclei what can also change the estimates of thebarrier height of such isotopes.Fig. 1. Comparison of theoretical masses obtained using the LSDmodel with the experimental data for known isotopes.45
Page 3: NUCLEAR PHYSICSIN POLAND1996-20063
Page 6 and 7: Report of Polish Nuclear Physics Ne
Page 8 and 9: 4• The isoscalar bosons in nuclea
Page 10 and 11: 6• Application of the Mössbauer
Page 13 and 14: POLISH NUCLEAR PHYSICS NETWORKJerzy
Page 15 and 16: Fig. 4. AIC-144, K=60 light particl
Page 17: OVERVIEW PAPERS13
Page 20 and 21: A successfulstudy on the decay ofpr
Page 22 and 23: visible light and a CCD camera will
Page 24 and 25: the heavy ion cyclotron up to an en
Page 26 and 27: investigated by means of ALICE and
Page 28 and 29: and/or baryon density of the nuclea
Page 30 and 31: Figure 5. Top: K - /K + ratio in Ni
Page 32 and 33: Acknowledgements: I would like to t
Page 34 and 35: 7%6%5%4%3%2%1%0%8%7%6%5%4%3%2%1%0%E
Page 37 and 38: NUCLEAR PHYSICS IN POLAND - APPLICA
Page 39 and 40: Funds of the European Union foresee
Page 41 and 42: POSSIBLE LOCATION FOR THE UNDERGROU
Page 43 and 44: Fig. 5. Time dependence of maximume
Page 45: CONTRIBUTIONS41
Page 50 and 51: [1] K. Pomorski and J. Dudek, Phys.
Page 52 and 53: [1] J. Jastrzębski, H. Daniel, T.
Page 54 and 55: [1] P.Adrich, A.Klimkiewicz, M. Fal
Page 56 and 57: [4] J. Dobaczewski, W. Nazarewicz,
Page 58 and 59: [1] A. Sobiczewski, F.A. Gareev, B.
Page 60 and 61: [1] R. Smolańczuk, Phys. Rev. C 56
Page 62 and 63: [1] W.J. Świątecki, K. Siwek-Wilc
Page 64 and 65: [1] J. Peter, N. Alamanos, N. Amar,
Page 66 and 67: [1] R. Broda, J. Phys. (London) G32
Page 68 and 69: 1. J. Styczeń, J. Chevallier, B. H
Page 70 and 71: [1] E. Grodner, J. Srebrny, Ch. Dro
Page 72 and 73: [1] C.Plettner, L.Batist, J.Doring,
Page 74 and 75: [1] W. Kurcewicz, Hyperfine Interac
Page 76 and 77: [1] M. Sugawara, Y. Toh, T.Czosnyka
Page 78 and 79: [1] M.Loewe, J.de Boer, H.J.Maier,
Page 80 and 81: [1] S.G. Rohoziński, K. Starosta,
Page 82 and 83: [1] B. Nerlo-Pomorska, K. Pomorski,
Page 84 and 85: [1] L.Próchniak, K.Zając, K.Pomor
Page 86 and 87: [1] J. Dobaczewski, J. Dudek, Comp.
Page 88 and 89: [1] W. Nazarewicz, J. Dobaczewski,
Page 90 and 91: [1] L. Próchniak, P. Quentin, D. S
Page 92 and 93: [1] K. Zając, Acta Phys. Pol. B34,
Page 94 and 95: [1] L. Próchniak, K. Zając, K. Po
Page 96 and 97: [1] A.Maj, M.Kmiecik, F.Camera, B.H
Page 98 and 99:
[1] M.Kicińska-Habior, K.A.Snover,
Page 100 and 101:
[1] P.Adrich, A.Klimkiewicz, M. Fal
Page 102 and 103:
[1] K. Czerski, H. Bucka, P. Heide
Page 104 and 105:
[1] C.R Bingham, M.N. Tantawy, J.C.
Page 107 and 108:
NUCLEAR OPEN QUANTUM SYSTEM MANY-BO
Page 109 and 110:
THREE-NUCLEON FORCE EFFECTS IN NUCL
Page 111 and 112:
RELATIVISTIC EFFECTS IN THREE-NUCLE
Page 113 and 114:
ELECTRON AND PHOTON SCATTERING ON T
Page 115 and 116:
EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES OF THREE-NUCLE
Page 117 and 118:
A SEARCH FOR MAJORANA NEUTRINOExper
Page 119 and 120:
DOUBLE BETA DECAY MATRIX ELEMENTS I
Page 121 and 122:
NEUTRINOLESS DOUBLE BETA DECAYIN SU
Page 123 and 124:
FUSION BARRIER DISTRIBUTIONSP.Czosn
Page 125 and 126:
NUCLEAR OPTICAL POTENTIAL FROM LIGH
Page 127 and 128:
REACTIONS WITH LOOSELY BOUND PROJEC
Page 129 and 130:
NEUTRON-INDUCED REACTIONSJ. Andrzej
Page 131 and 132:
NUCLEAR FUSION AND FISSION IN MEAN-
Page 133 and 134:
FISSION AND FUSION OF NUCLEI WITHIN
Page 135 and 136:
ENHANCED ELECTRON SCREENING IN DEUT
Page 137 and 138:
EXPERIMENTAL APPROACHES TO HEAVY IO
Page 139 and 140:
HEAVY ION EXPERIMENTS AT LNS CATANI
Page 141 and 142:
HEAVY ION REACTION MECHANISMS AT FE
Page 143 and 144:
HARD PHOTONS FROM NUCLEUS-NUCLEUSAN
Page 145 and 146:
NEUTRAL MESON PRODUCTION AND BARYON
Page 147 and 148:
CORRELATIONS AND FLUCTUATIONS IN HE
Page 149 and 150:
MASS AND ISOTOPIC EFFECTS IN NUCLEA
Page 151 and 152:
NUCLEAR MATTER AT THE LIQUID-GAS PH
Page 153 and 154:
HEAVY-ION COLLISIONS: GEOMETRY AND
Page 155 and 156:
MULTIFRAGMENTATION IN HEAVY-ION COL
Page 157 and 158:
ULTRA-RELATIVISTIC REACTIONS BETWEE
Page 159 and 160:
INVESTIGATION OF HADRON PROPERTIES
Page 161 and 162:
SPALLATION AND FRAGMENTATION OF ATO
Page 163 and 164:
STRANGE-PARTICLE PRODUCTION IN NUCL
Page 165 and 166:
PHASE TRANSITIONS IN HIGHLY EXCITED
Page 167 and 168:
NUCLEAR SINGLE PARTICLE SUM RULES I
Page 169 and 170:
FLUCTUATIONS AND SEARCH FOR THE CRI
Page 171 and 172:
BETWEEN NUCLEAR AND ELEMENTARY INTE
Page 173 and 174:
INVESTIGATION OF CHARGE AND ISOSPIN
Page 175 and 176:
NUCLEAR STATES OF η, K MESONS, Σ
Page 177 and 178:
HYPERON RESONANCES PRODUCED IN PROT
Page 179 and 180:
NONMESONIC DECAY OF Λ - HYPERON IN
Page 181 and 182:
INTERACTION OF THE η AND η΄ MESO
Page 183 and 184:
INVESTIGATION OF THE HYPERON-NUCLEO
Page 185 and 186:
η AND η΄ MESONS PRODUCTION IN D-
Page 187 and 188:
K+ PRODUCTION IN PROTON-NUCLEUS REA
Page 189 and 190:
INTERACTION OF K + K - MESONSJ. Bal
Page 191 and 192:
PRODUCTION OF K+ AND K- MESONS IN H
Page 193 and 194:
AT THE BORDER BETWEEN ATOMIC AND NU
Page 195 and 196:
ATOMIC PHYSICS IN HEAVY ION - ATOM
Page 197 and 198:
PRECISION TESTS OF THE STANDARD MOD
Page 199 and 200:
SEARCH FOR TIME REVERSAL VIOLATION
Page 201 and 202:
HIGH INTENSITY ULTRA-COLD NEUTRON S
Page 203 and 204:
NUCLEAR PHYSICS WITH ULTRACOLD ATOM
Page 205 and 206:
FORWARD SPECTROMETER FOR PANDAD. Gi
Page 207 and 208:
DESIGN STUDIES OF CHARMONIUM DETECT
Page 209 and 210:
ONLINE EVENT SELECTION IN THE CBM E
Page 211 and 212:
DEVELOPMENT OF A FAST DATA READOUT
Page 213 and 214:
NEW TECHNOLOGIES OF SILICON DETECTO
Page 215 and 216:
NUCLEAR REACTIONS IN THE ACCELERATI
Page 217 and 218:
NATURAL RADIOACTIVITY STUDIES IN SO
Page 219 and 220:
APPLICATION OF THE MÖSSBAUER SPECT
Page 221 and 222:
POSITRON ANNIHILATION LIFETIME SPEC
Page 223 and 224:
VALIDATION OF NUCLEAR DATA AND MODE
Page 225 and 226:
LOOK TO THE FUTURE: NUCLEARPHYSICS
Page 227 and 228:
LONG-RANGE PLAN OF POLISH NUCLEAR P
Page 229 and 230:
225
Page 231 and 232:
THE OUTLINE OF BUDGET EXPENDITUREST
Page 233 and 234:
INSTITUTION AND AUTHORINDEXES229
Page 235 and 236:
INSTITUTION INDEXAA. Sołtan Instit
Page 237 and 238:
Kistryn, S, 111, 157, 169, 193, 195
Page 239 and 240:
UNITS OF POLISH NUCLEAR PHYSICSNETW
Page 241 and 242:
POLISH NUCLEAR PHYSICS NETWORKList
Page 243 and 244:
LIST OF ELECTRONIC ADDRESSES239
Page 245 and 246:
Nuclear Physics community in Poland
Page 247 and 248:
Faculty of Physics and Applied Info
Page 249 and 250:
Kurpeta Jan jkurpeta@mimuw.edu.plMa
Page 251 and 252:
Gil Damian damian.gil@if.uj.edu.plG
Page 253 and 254:
Nuclear Physics community in Poland
Page 255 and 256:
Kopeć Mariusz AGH FPACS mariusz@no
Page 257 and 258:
Rząca-Urban Teresa IEP UW rzaca@@f
Page 259 and 260:
Białkowska Helena IPJ Helena.Bialk
Page 261 and 262:
Krauze Maciej IP US meszik@nuph.us.
Page 263 and 264:
Słowiński Bronisław PhF WUT slow
Page 265 and 266:
AGH FPACS - AGH University of Scien
show all

nuclear physics in poland 1996 â 2006

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?

nuclear physics in poland 1996 â 2006