Psychology of Terrorism - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Psychology of Terrorism - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Psychology of Terrorism - National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ethnic group: he or she must also support the identity against rival claims. Thus, in order to becomepolitically effective it must organize.-Almost every ethnic terrorist group actively raises funds among its own people.-By calling attention to a group and its cause, terrorist acts fulfill another organizational goal:recruitment into the movement. Radical groups commonly vie for the same members, particularlyyoung disaffected males.-At times group maintenance becomes the primary goal <strong>of</strong> an ethnic terrorist group, subsuming evenits identity-strengthening agendas.-Impact <strong>of</strong> Rival Populations:-Ethnic terrorism creates fear among political victims. Fear serves two purposes. First, it silencestalk <strong>of</strong> compromise and accommodations by discrediting the political system and the mediationprocess. Second, it stimulates immigration and population transfers.-Ethnic violence can also undermine an incipient democracy, which might otherwise bringmultiethnic societies together.Terrorist Groups, Insurgencies, and Popular Movements:-Nonviolent mainstream groups have an ambivalent relationship with terrorist organizations.-Mainstream ethnic movements <strong>of</strong>ten capitalize on terrorist violence.-Clever moderate leaders can capitalize on extremist pressure even as they denounce extremistactivities.-The climate <strong>of</strong> fear by terrorist is particularly important for ethnic insurgencies. Even when apopulation does not support an insurgent group's cause, fear <strong>of</strong> terrorist violence can leadindividuals to cooperate.-Political movements can also act as fonts for terrorist groups.-The International Aspect <strong>of</strong> Ethnic <strong>Terrorism</strong>:-If the focus <strong>of</strong> ethnic terrorism is on local issues and identities, why might an ethnic terrorist groupstrike an international target such as the United States? Terrorists <strong>of</strong>ten justify such strikes aspunishment for foreign support <strong>of</strong> their rivals.-Tremendous publicity is generated for the group that commits an act <strong>of</strong> international terrorism.-A second attraction <strong>of</strong> international targets is that they force a state response.-More <strong>of</strong>ten than not, successful ethnic terrorist groups receive some form <strong>of</strong> aid from outsidepowers or Diaspora communities.-The usual tried-and-tested means <strong>of</strong> countering terrorism are <strong>of</strong>ten not effective in fighting ethnicterrorism. Particularly futile is the use <strong>of</strong> moral outage. Statements declaring ethnic terrorists to beoutlaws and other such legal and rhetorical tools do not work.-The ideal way to counter ethnic terrorism is through "in group" policing in which the ethnic groupas a whole identifies, ostracizes, and suppresses radicals.-Thus authorities should encourage groups to police themselves. Such self-monitoring is far moreeffective and causes less resentment in the community as a whole.-A first step toward encouraging "in group" policing is to recognize and protect the forces <strong>of</strong>moderation..-In general, crackdown against terrorists should steer on the side <strong>of</strong> caution with regard to moderatepolitical activists.-In addition to "in group" policing, governments might consider fostering an identity that competeswith that promoted by the terrorists.-Policymakers and analysts alike must recognize that ethnic terrorism <strong>of</strong>ten differs considerablyfrom other types <strong>of</strong> terrorism. Ethnic terrorism has its own goals-and its own vulnerabilities-thatanalysts should recognize when examining how to cope with this problem.-One key is the relationship that a government has with a mainstream ethnic opposition movement.-States should try to improve a mainstream movement's desire to police radicals in its owncommunity.-By giving moderate forces more influence, the state can <strong>of</strong>ten drive a wedge between moderates andradicals.-Indeed, one danger governments must avoid is being too successful against moderate ethnicopposition movements.-Governments with resistive ethnic groups <strong>of</strong>ten must choose between stopping terrorist violence orpreventing ethnic governments from achieving their particular goals.