Levin, Henry M., and Emma Garcia. 2013. Benefit-Cost Analysis of Accelerated Study in AssociatePrograms (ASAP) of the City University of New York (CUNY). New York: Center for Benefit-Cost Studies in Education, Teachers College, Columbia University.Linderman, Donna, and Zineta Kolenovic. 2009. Early Outcomes Report for City University of NewYork (CUNY) Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP). New York: The CityUniversity of New York.Linderman, Donna, and Zineta Kolenovic. 2012. Results Thus Far and the Road Ahead: A FollowupReport on CUNY Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP). New York: The CityUniversity of New York.Linderman, Donna, Elayna Konstan, and Lan To. 2011. Graduate NYC! Catalogue of CUNYAdvisement Models/Practices. New York: The City University of New York.Long, Bridget Terry, and Angela Boatman. 2013. “The Role of Remedial and DevelopmentalCourses in Access and Persistence,” in Laura W. Perna and Anthony P. Jones (eds.), The Stateof College Access and Completion: Improving College Success for Students fromUnderrepresented Groups. New York: Routledge.Palmer, Robert T., Ryan J. Davis, James L. Moore, and Adriel A. Hilton. 2010. “A Nation at Risk:Increasing College Participation and Persistence Among African American Males to StimulateU.S. Global Competitiveness.” Journal of African American Males in Education 1, 2: 105-124.Patel, Reshma, Lashawn Richburg-Hayes, Elijah de la Campa, and Timothy Rudd. 2013. UsingFinancial Aid to Promote Student Progress: Interim Findings from the Performance-BasedScholarship Demonstration. New York: MDRC.Patel, Reshma, and Timothy Rudd. 2012. Can Scholarships Alone Help Students Succeed? Lessonsfrom Two New York City Community Colleges. New York: MDRC.Perin, Dolores. 2004. “Remediation Beyond Developmental Education: The Use of LearningAssistance Centers to Increase Academic Preparedness in Community Colleges.” CommunityCollege Journal 28, 7: 559-582.Person, Ann E., James E. Rosenbaum, and Regina Deil-Amen. 2006. “Student Planning andInformation Problems in Different College Structures.” Teachers College Record 108, 3: 374-396.Rheinheimer, David C., Beverlyn Grace-Odeleye, Germain E. Francois, and Cynthia Kusorgbor.2010. “Tutoring: A Support Strategy for At-risk Students.” Learning Assistance Review 15, 1:23-34.Robbins, Rich. 2013. “Implications of Advising Load.” in Aaron Carlstrom (eds.), 2011 NationalSurvey of Academic Advising (Monograph No. 25). Manhattan, KS: National AcademicAdvising Association.Rutschow, Elizabeth Zachry, Dan Cullinan, and Rashida Welbeck. 2012. Keeping Students onCourse: An Impact Study of a Student Success Course at Guilford Technical CommunityCollege. New York: MDRC.126
Rutschow, Elizabeth Zachry, and Emily Schneider. 2011. Unlocking the Gate: What We KnowAbout Improving Developmental Education. New York: MDRC.Scrivener, Susan, and Michael J. Weiss. 2009. More Guidance, Better Results? Three-Year Effectsof an Enhanced Student Services Program at Two Community Colleges. New York: MDRC.Scrivener, Susan, and Michael J. Weiss. 2013. More Graduates: Two-Year Results from anEvaluation of Accelerated Study in Associate Programs (ASAP) for Developmental EducationStudents. New York: MDRC.Scrivener, Susan, Michael J. Weiss, and Colleen Sommo. 2012. What Can a Multifaceted ProgramDo for Community College Students? Early Results from an Evaluation of Accelerated Study inAssociate Programs (ASAP) for Developmental Education Students. New York: MDRC.Snyder, Thomas D., and Sally A. Dillow. 2013. Digest of Education Statistics 2012. Washington,DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center forEducation.Sommo, Colleen, Melissa Boynton, Herbert Collado, John Diamond, Alissa Gardenhire, AlyssaRatledge, Timothy Rudd, Michael J. Weiss. 2014. Mapping Success: Performance-BasedScholarships, Student Services, and Developmental Math at Hillsborough Community College.New York: MDRC.Sommo, Colleen, Alexander K. Mayer, Timothy Rudd, and Dan Cullinan. 2012. CommencementDay: Six-Year Effects of a Freshman Learning Community Program at KingsboroughCommunity College. New York: MDRC.Taylor, Kathe, William S. Moore, Jean MacGregor, and Jerri Lindblad. 2003. Learning CommunityResearch and Assessment: What We Know Now. Olympia, WA: Washington Center.The Advisory Committee on Student Financial Assistance. 2001. Access Denied: RestoringtheNation’s Commitment to Equal Educational Opportunity. Washington, D.C.: U.S.Department of Education.The Institute for College Access and Success. 2009. “Quick Facts About Financial Aid andCommunity Colleges 2007-08.” Website: http://www.ticas.org/files/pub/cc_fact_sheet.pdf.U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), “NCESQuickStats.” Website: http://nces.edu.gov/datalab/quickstats.Weiss, Michael J., Mary G. Visher, Evan Weissman, and Heather Wathington. Forthcoming. “TheImpact of Learning Communities for Students in Developmental Education: A Synthesis ofFindings from Randomized Trials at Six Community Colleges.” Educational Evaluation andPolicy Analysis.Weiss, Michael J., Alexander Mayer, Dan Cullinan, Alyssa Ratledge, Colleen Sommo, and JohnDiamond. 2014. A Random Assignment Evaluation of Learning Communities at KingsboroughCommunity College: Seven Years Later. New York: MDRC.What Works Clearinghouse Reporting Guide for Study Authors. 2012. Washington, DC: Instituteof Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Website:http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_gsa_v1.pdf.127
- Page 1:
DOUBLINGGRADUATIONRATESThree-Year E
- Page 4 and 5:
The ASAP evaluation is supported by
- Page 7 and 8:
ContentsOverviewList of ExhibitsPre
- Page 9 and 10:
List of ExhibitsTableES.1 Key Diffe
- Page 11:
PrefaceCommunity colleges provide r
- Page 14 and 15:
ing students. Several ASAP staff wo
- Page 16 and 17:
• Financial supports: Students re
- Page 18 and 19:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 20 and 21:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 22 and 23:
ed. ASAP provides enhanced student
- Page 24 and 25:
public transportation. By the end o
- Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 1IntroductionPostsecondary
- Page 29 and 30:
lation and graduation rates of any
- Page 31 and 32:
The same may be said about the ASAP
- Page 33:
Finally, MDRC examined the costs of
- Page 36 and 37:
Random Assignment Process and the S
- Page 38 and 39:
CharacteristicEvaluation of Acceler
- Page 40 and 41:
tal courses, the characteristics of
- Page 42 and 43:
the program. Transcript data prior
- Page 44 and 45:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 46 and 47:
included the ASAP Assistant Directo
- Page 48 and 49:
Advisers discussed both full-time e
- Page 50 and 51:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 52 and 53:
participating in the program: conta
- Page 54 and 55:
Table 3.3 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 56 and 57:
survey respondents, 49 percent comp
- Page 58 and 59:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 60 and 61:
Other Student ServicesASAP offered
- Page 62 and 63:
equired to work with academic depar
- Page 64 and 65:
Service contrast: In general, non-A
- Page 66 and 67:
The average tuition waiver among pr
- Page 68 and 69:
Box 3.4Javier and the Value of the
- Page 70 and 71:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 72 and 73:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 74 and 75:
Looking to the Next ChapterOverall,
- Page 76 and 77:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 78 and 79:
52Enrollment rate (%)10090807060504
- Page 80 and 81:
ASAP consistently increased student
- Page 82 and 83:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 84 and 85:
Table 4.2 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 86 and 87:
(See Table 4.3 for more details.) A
- Page 88 and 89:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 90 and 91:
cohort (spring or fall). 16 A forma
- Page 92 and 93:
Table 4.5 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 94 and 95:
Table 4.6 (continued)SOURCE: MDRC c
- Page 96 and 97:
ASAP has had a dramatic effect on t
- Page 98 and 99:
$16,284 of additional investment in
- Page 100 and 101:
Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 102 and 103: • Career and employment services
- Page 104 and 105: college, which is not the case. 8 F
- Page 106 and 107: cost is equal to the average cost p
- Page 108 and 109: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 110 and 111: program group is $13,423 (11.4 perc
- Page 112 and 113: credits than control group students
- Page 114 and 115: Students in CUNY’s focus groups a
- Page 116 and 117: tion’s Finish Faster initiative,
- Page 118 and 119: least 6 percent were married. 11 AS
- Page 120 and 121: college, the results will shed ligh
- Page 123 and 124: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 125: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 129 and 130: This appendix addresses two aspects
- Page 131 and 132: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 133 and 134: and among survey respondents would
- Page 135 and 136: 2. Creation of Survey ScalesThis se
- Page 137: A scale is created as the unweighte
- Page 141 and 142: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 143 and 144: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 145 and 146: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 147 and 148: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 149 and 150: Evaluation of Accelerated Study in
- Page 151: ReferencesAdelman, Clifford. 2005.
- Page 155: About MDRCMDRC is a nonprofit, nonp