01.12.2012 Views

category 4 a - oasis data set forms - Missouri Department of Health ...

category 4 a - oasis data set forms - Missouri Department of Health ...

category 4 a - oasis data set forms - Missouri Department of Health ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

[Q&A ADDED 08/07; Previously CMS OCCB 05/07 Q&A #21]<br />

Q105.9. M1340. Is a PICC placed by a physician under fluoroscopy and sutured in<br />

place considered a surgical wound? It would seem that placement by this<br />

procedure is similar to other central lines and would be considered a surgical<br />

wound.<br />

A105.9. Even though the physician utilized fluoroscopy to insert the peripherally inserted<br />

central catheter (PICC) and sutured it in place, it is not a surgical wound, as PICC lines<br />

are excluded as surgical wounds for OASIS <strong>data</strong> collection purposes.<br />

[Q&A EDITED 09/09; ADDED 08/07; Previously CMS OCCB 07/07 Q&A #8]<br />

Q105.10. M1340. If a surgical wound is completely covered with steri-strips is it<br />

considered non observable?<br />

A105.10. Chapter 3 <strong>of</strong> the OASIS-C Guidance Manual states, "A [surgical] wound is<br />

considered not observable if it is covered by a dressing (or cast) which is not to be<br />

removed, per physician's order." Although unusual, if the steri-strip placement did not<br />

allow sufficient visualization <strong>of</strong> the incision, and if the physician provided specific orders<br />

for the steri-strips to not be removed, then the wound would be considered not<br />

observable. However, a surgical wound with steri-strips should be considered<br />

observable in the absence <strong>of</strong> physician orders to not remove strips for assessment, or if<br />

usual placement allows sufficient visualization <strong>of</strong> the surgical incision to allow<br />

observation <strong>of</strong> clinical features necessary to determine the surgical wound’s healing<br />

status (e.g., incisional approximation, degree <strong>of</strong> epithelialization, incisional necrosis<br />

(scab), and/or signs or symptoms <strong>of</strong> infection).<br />

[Q&A ADDED 08/07; M item number updated 09/09; Previously CMS OCCB 07/07 Q&A<br />

#9]<br />

Q105.11. M1340. Is a heart cath site (femoral) considered a surgical wound? If<br />

not, what if a stent is placed?<br />

A105.11. If a cardiac catheterization was performed via a puncture with a needle into the<br />

femoral artery, the catheter insertion site is not reported as a surgical wound for M1340.<br />

The fact that a stent was placed does not have an impact.<br />

[Q&A ADDED & EDITED 09/09; Previously CMS OCCB 10/07 Q&A #17]<br />

Q105.12. M1340. If a drain was placed post-op and removed prior to admission to<br />

home health is the drain site considered a surgical wound upon admission to<br />

home care?<br />

A105.12. A wound with a drain is reported as a surgical wound at M1340. It remains a<br />

surgical wound after the drain is pulled until re-epithelialization has been present for<br />

approximately 30 days at which time it becomes a scar.<br />

[Q&A ADDED & EDITED 09/09; Previously CMS OCCB 10/07 Q&A #19]<br />

Q105.13. M1340. A patient had a skin cancer lesion removed in a doctor's <strong>of</strong>fice<br />

with a few sutures to close the wound. Is this considered a surgical wound?<br />

A105.13. A shave, punch or excisional biopsy, utilized to remove and/or diagnose skin<br />

lesions, does result in a surgical wound. It is considered a surgical wound until re-<br />

Category 4 – OASIS Data Set – Forms and Items 09/09

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!