12.07.2015 Views

European Sports Law and Policy Bulletin THE BERNARD ... - Slpc.eu

European Sports Law and Policy Bulletin THE BERNARD ... - Slpc.eu

European Sports Law and Policy Bulletin THE BERNARD ... - Slpc.eu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

EUROPEAN SPORTS LAW AND POLICY BULLETIN 1/2010JUSTIFICATION OF TRAINING COMPENSATION IN EUROPEANFOOTBALL: BOSMAN AND <strong>BERNARD</strong> COMPAREDby Frank Hendrickx∗SUMMARY: Introduction – 1. A brief overview of the discussion in the Bernard case– 2. Training compensation from Bosman to Bernard – 2.1 Facts <strong>and</strong> setting – 2.2Historical connection – 2.3 Underlying problem – 2.4 Considerations with regardto training compensation – 2.5 Specificity of sport versus the broader labour market– 2.6 Employment law perspectives in <strong>and</strong> beyond sport – 3. Justified trainingcompensation under EU free movement law – ConclusionsIntroductionOn 16 March 2010 the <strong>European</strong> Court of Justice delivered its judgment in thecase of Olympique Lyonnais SASP v Olivier Bernard, Newcastle United FC,in short referred to as the «Bernard case». 1 This contribution aims to provide ananalysis of the Bernard case in comparison with the Bosman case. 2 The Bernardcase shows a lot of resemblance with the Bosman case, but this is not verysurprising. Both cases have quite a lot in common. In both cases, the <strong>European</strong>Court of Justice considered professional sport, more in particular football in a<strong>European</strong> context, as an economic activity. On each occasion, a violation wasfound of <strong>European</strong> Union law, as there was an irregular limitation of the freemovement of workers. Both the Bosman <strong>and</strong> the Bernard case also have relevanceoutside the world of sport. They consider a broader labour market problem, whichis the encouragement of training of talented workers <strong>and</strong> the protection of humancapital investment of the employer.The present contribution aims to go beyond a mere comparison of theBosman <strong>and</strong> Bernard cases. Taking the cases together, an attempt is made todefine the conditions under which a training compensation in professional footballcould be considered valid under <strong>European</strong> free movement law.____________________∗Professor of Labour <strong>Law</strong>, University of L<strong>eu</strong>ven, Jean Monnet Professor, ReflecT, Tilburg University.1ECJ, 16 March 2010, Olympique Lyonnais v Olivier Bernard <strong>and</strong> Newcastle United FC,C-325/08, not yet published in the ECR.2ECJ, 15 December 1995, Bosman, C-415/93, ECR I-4921.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!