preliminary soil salinity assessment - Mid Western Regional Council

More documents

Recommendations

Info

3 SITE INVESTIGATION RESULTS AND DISCUSSION3.1 Results of Laboratory AnalysisA summary of the results of the top (A horizon), upper subsoil (B horizon) and lower subsoil (Chorizon) soil sample analysis for each site is provided in Table 16: Summary of Laboratory AnalysisResults. The laboratory Certificate of Analysis with details of the soil analysis is contained inAppendix C: Laboratory Certificate of Analysis of Soil Samples.The EC 1:5 recordings within the study area were low ranging from 28 to 292 µS/cm. The topsoils wereloam and light clay type soils and the subsoils (B and C horizons) ranged from loams to heavy claysoils. Based on the soil textures for each site and corresponding conversion multiplication factors(see Table 11: Factors for Converting EC1 :5 to ECe), the EC e across the site ranged from 0.21 to 1.99dS/m. Therefore, the soils sampled at each of the four sites are considered Non-Saline based on theelectrical conductivity results and taking into account the soil texture multiplication factors. Notethat the EC e of the topsoil at Site 1 and lower subsoil at Site 4 are slightly elevated (1.99 dS/m and1.75 dS/m respectively) and close to the threshold for soils considered Slightly Saline (2-4 dS/m).Exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP %) varied across the site. The topsoils (A horizons) and uppersubsoils (B Horizons) were all found to be non-sodic. However, the lower subsoils (C horizons) at Site1 and Site 4 were highly sodic measuring 23.7 and 16.2 ESP% respectively. The lower subsoil (CHorizon) at Site 6 was also found to be slightly sodic with an ESP% of 6.3.Chloride levels in most of the soils sampled were found to be low, consistent with the EC findings.However, chlorides were slightly elevated at Site 6 measuring 320mg/kg in the topsoil (A Horizon)and 360mg/kg in the lower subsoil (C Horizon). Although this level of chloride in clay soil wouldgenerally be considered slightly elevated for agricultural production and may cause chloride toxicityon some garden plants, these chlorides did not result in elevated EC levels and according to theAustralian Standard 2159: 1995 Piling – Design and Installation, this level of chlorides would beconsidered non-aggressive for steel piles in soil. Chloride levels were also slightly elevated at Site 4(290 mg/kg) and in conjunction with the high sodium levels and slightly elevated EC e calculated forthis site, indicate that the main type of salt contributing to the slightly elevated EC e is sodiumchloride. This chloride level would also be considered non-aggressive according to AustralianStandard 2159: 1995 Piling – Design and Installation.The pH varied across the subject land with the pH of the 17 soil samples ranging from slightly acid(6.2) to slightly alkaline (8.6). According to AS 2159: 1995 Piling – Design and Installation this pHrange is considered non-aggressive.PRELIMINARY SOIL SALINITY ASSESSMENT20
TABLE 16: SUMMARY OF LABORATORY ANALYSIS RESULTSCompoundUnit Site 1TopSite 1UpperSubSite 1LowerSubSite 2TopSite 2SubSite 3TopSite 3UpperSubSite 3LowerSubSite 4TopSite 4UpperSubSite 4LowerSubSite 5TopSite 5UpperSubSite 5LowerSubSite 6TopSite 6UpperSubSite 6LowerSubEC 1:5 @ 25° µS/cm 142 97 30 90 199 93 31 46 55 28 292 71 73 81 127 72 73EC 1:5 @ 25° dS/m 0.142 0.097 0.03 0.09 0.199 0.093 0.031 0.046 0.055 0.028 0.292 0.071 0.073 0.081 0.127 0.072 0.073Soil TextureConversionFactorEC e usingconversionfactor for soiltextureSandyLoamClayLoamMedClaySandyLoamMedClaySandyLoamClayLoamLightClayLoam14 9 7 14 7 14 9 8.5 10 10 6 10 14 7 8.5 14 7dS/m 1.99 0.87 0.21 1.26 1.39 1.30 0.28 0.39 0.55 0.28 1.75 0.71 1.02 0.57 1.08 1.01 0.51Sodium meq/100g 0.1 0.3 2.2
Page 2 and 3: This report has been prepared byCon
Page 4 and 5: Table of TablesTable 1: Summary of
Page 6 and 7: Source: NSW Department of Primary I
Page 8 and 9: egional processes”. Existing and
Page 10 and 11: TABLE 2: MONTHLY RAINFALL RECORDS,
Page 12 and 13: likely to have reduced the concentr
Page 14 and 15: drainage in the floor of the livest
Page 16 and 17: Plate 5: Soil profile at Site 5 soi
Page 18 and 19: TABLE 3: DOMINANT GROUND COVER SPEC
Page 20 and 21: 2.6.3 Soil Sampling for Laboratory
Page 22 and 23: Table 12: ECe Values of Soil Salini
Page 26 and 27: This page has been intentionally le
Page 28 and 29: As discussed previously (Section 3.
Page 30 and 31: 4. Consider drainage with adequate
Page 32 and 33: Appendix ALocation MapThe land subj
Page 35 and 36: This page has been intentionally le
Page 37: This page has been intentionally le
Page 40 and 41: Appendix CLaboratory Certificate of
Page 51: This page has intentionally been le

preliminary soil salinity assessment - Mid Western Regional Council

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?