- Page 3 and 4:
Authors and AcknowledgementsThis gu
- Page 5 and 6:
2.2. Br i n g i n g f o r e s t car
- Page 9 and 10:
needed credibility to the forestry
- Page 11 and 12:
This lower market share can be expl
- Page 13 and 14:
that are used include grants, prefe
- Page 15 and 16:
◆◆ ConclusionWhile forestry pro
- Page 17 and 18:
a)Gt equiv-CO 2 /year28,735,639,444
- Page 19 and 20:
1.2. The different types of forest
- Page 21 and 22:
What is a forest?The United Nations
- Page 23 and 24:
1.2.4. Projects concerning uses of
- Page 25 and 26:
organized 13 . Rapidly increasing i
- Page 27 and 28:
In national GHG inventories, Articl
- Page 29 and 30:
◆◆ Forest carbon in non-Annex I
- Page 31 and 32:
At present, CDM forest projects onl
- Page 33 and 34:
to their development no longer exis
- Page 35 and 36:
Primary CDM credits traded in 2008
- Page 37 and 38:
Main forest quality standards on th
- Page 39 and 40:
The quantities of forest credits tr
- Page 41 and 42:
several plantation sites but run by
- Page 43 and 44:
It should be remembered that the da
- Page 45 and 46:
1< 5< 10< 30> 30Projects seeking st
- Page 47 and 48:
We were able to collect data on sur
- Page 49 and 50:
1.5. ConclusionCompared to the fear
- Page 51 and 52:
2. Prospects for the forestcarbon m
- Page 53 and 54:
of GHG emissions, etc.). Moreover,
- Page 55 and 56:
For countries currently experiencin
- Page 57 and 58:
2.1.2.2. Implementing and financing
- Page 59 and 60:
With more robust data on GHG emissi
- Page 61 and 62:
system similar to the current CDM o
- Page 63 and 64:
Aside from these funds dedicated to
- Page 65 and 66:
It should be noted that a change in
- Page 67 and 68:
to boost project development. Howev
- Page 69 and 70:
Project for commercial reforestatio
- Page 71 and 72:
Investor Bank Public or philanthrop
- Page 73 and 74:
Drawing up these documents and secu
- Page 75 and 76:
Case 1:JumaCase 2: ARCorridorCase 3
- Page 77 and 78:
In order to cover these costs, the
- Page 79 and 80:
REDD project is to curb deforestati
- Page 81 and 82:
3.2.1.2. Carbon costsImplementing t
- Page 83 and 84:
3.2.1.3. Management costsManaging,
- Page 85 and 86:
Income will depend on the volume of
- Page 87 and 88:
3.2.2.6. ConclusionCalculating cost
- Page 89 and 90:
3.2.3.3. Conclusion and recommendat
- Page 91 and 92:
Titleholders (100 %)ShareholdersInv
- Page 93 and 94:
Other indicators can also give a go
- Page 95 and 96:
IRR examples for plantations and na
- Page 97 and 98:
Example of a debt-financed project:
- Page 99 and 100:
3.3.2.3. Subsidies and donationsA s
- Page 101 and 102:
(Merrill Lynch, JP Morgan, BNP Pari
- Page 103 and 104:
InitiativesBioCarbon Fund(World Ban
- Page 105 and 106:
CasestudyNo. 1:JumaNo. 2: ARCorrido
- Page 107 and 108:
Carbon standardsExperience and cred
- Page 109 and 110:
3.4.1.2. Project eligibility for th
- Page 111 and 112:
To handle the issue of permanence u
- Page 113 and 114: number of credits generated under a
- Page 115 and 116: Plan Vivo Suitable forvery small-sc
- Page 117 and 118: ◆◆ Who has rights over the tree
- Page 119 and 120: (when the transaction is effectivel
- Page 121 and 122: ◆◆ the person(s) financing the
- Page 123 and 124: 3.4.2.4. How should carbon credit o
- Page 125 and 126: A contract presupposes an agreement
- Page 127 and 128: carbon credits. It is important to
- Page 129 and 130: The parties may agree on the method
- Page 131 and 132: Annex 1: Applicable methodologiesfo
- Page 133 and 134: Methodologies for large scale affor
- Page 135 and 136: Methodologies for small-scale Affor
- Page 137 and 138: Annex 2: The CDM project cycle136
- Page 139 and 140: The table below compares the calcul
- Page 141 and 142: Case study no. 1Avoided deforestati
- Page 143 and 144: Project activities and costs are as
- Page 145 and 146: Case study no. 2Ankeniheny-Zahamena
- Page 147 and 148: Project costs: 1.8 MUS$11%8%Activit
- Page 149 and 150: Case Study no. 3Ankeniheny-Zahamena
- Page 151 and 152: Direct income from conservation act
- Page 153 and 154: Case study no. 4Commercial (re)affo
- Page 155 and 156: Project costs: 15 M€4% Activity:
- Page 157 and 158: Case study no. 5Afforestation on th
- Page 159 and 160: Project costsProject income10%5%Pla
- Page 161 and 162: GlossaryAcronym French Acronym Engl
- Page 163: teqCO 2Tonne équivalent CO 2teqCO