12.07.2015 Views

Intrinsic Properties of Spatial Graphs - Denison University

Intrinsic Properties of Spatial Graphs - Denison University

Intrinsic Properties of Spatial Graphs - Denison University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> Conclusion<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>Blake MellorLoyola Marymount <strong>University</strong>The UnKnot Conference, 2012Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionIntroductionKnot theory: embeddings <strong>of</strong> a closed loop in 3-dimensionalspace.<strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>: embeddings <strong>of</strong> more complicated graphs in3-space.Question: What properties <strong>of</strong> spatial graphs are intrinsic to theabstract graph?Examples: <strong>Intrinsic</strong>ally linked, intrinsically knotted. Others?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionComplex Linking and KnottingIn the last talk, you heard about what is known about whichgraphs are intrinsically knotted and linked.We can also ask how complicated these links and knots needto be. In 2002, Flapan proved:Theorem (Flapan, 2002)For every n, there is an m such that every embedding <strong>of</strong> K m inR 3 contains a link with |lk(J, K )| ≥ n and a knot with crossingnumber at least n.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionComplex Linking and KnottingMore recently, we have:Theorem (Flapan, M, Naimi, 2008)For any n ∈ N, there’s a graph such that every embedding <strong>of</strong> itcontains a link with n knotted components each with crossingnumber ≥ n which are all pairwise linked with |lk(J, K )| ≥ n.So there are graphs such thatevery embedding contains alink at least as complicated asthe one shown to the right.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionHowever, the graphs constructed to prove this theorem areunreasonably large.QuestionWhat is the smallest m such that every embedding <strong>of</strong> K m in R 3contains a link with |lk(J, K )| ≥ 2? A knot with crossing numberat least 4?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionCounting Links and KnotsRather than asking how complicated the links and knots in aspatial graph must be, we could instead ask how many theremust be.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionCounting Links and KnotsRather than asking how complicated the links and knots in aspatial graph must be, we could instead ask how many theremust be.Conway and Gordon found an embedding <strong>of</strong> K 6 with exactlyone link, and an embedding <strong>of</strong> K 7 with exactly one (trefoil) knot.But larger graphs will be forced to contain many links and knots.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionCounting Links and KnotsRather than asking how complicated the links and knots in aspatial graph must be, we could instead ask how many theremust be.Conway and Gordon found an embedding <strong>of</strong> K 6 with exactlyone link, and an embedding <strong>of</strong> K 7 with exactly one (trefoil) knot.But larger graphs will be forced to contain many links and knots.Theorem (Blain*, Bowlin*, Foisy, Hendricks*, LaCombe*, 2007)For n > 8, every embedding <strong>of</strong> K n contains at leastknotted Hamiltonian cycles.(n − 1)!7!Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionCounting Links and Knots in Complete Partite <strong>Graphs</strong>Fleming and M (2009) gave upper and lower bounds for theminimum number <strong>of</strong> links in complete partite graphs on 7 or 8vertices.Abrams* and M (2010) extended this to counting links incomplete partite graphs on 9 vertices and knots in completepartite graphs on 8 vertices.In most cases, the bounds are not sharp, and there isconsiderable room for improvement. The table below gives afew results.graph K 7 K 3,3,1,1 K 8 K 4,4,1 K 9mnl 21 25 217 ≤ mnl ≤ 305 74 ≤ 3987mnk 1 1 15 ≤ mnk ≤ 29 ?? ??Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionA Minimal Embedding <strong>of</strong> K 8 ?Here is an embedding <strong>of</strong> K 8 with 305 links and 29 knots.Is it minimal?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionBook embeddingsIn a book embedding, a graph is embedded in a “book” <strong>of</strong> halfplanes joined along a “spine” (a line), so that the vertices are allembedded on the spine, and the edges in each page do notcross. A book embedding is minimal if it uses the smallestpossible number <strong>of</strong> pages.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionBook embeddingsIn a book embedding, a graph is embedded in a “book” <strong>of</strong> halfplanes joined along a “spine” (a line), so that the vertices are allembedded on the spine, and the edges in each page do notcross. A book embedding is minimal if it uses the smallestpossible number <strong>of</strong> pages.b 4b 3b 2Here is a book embedding forthe complete bipartite graphK 4,4 . It also realizes theminimal number <strong>of</strong> links inK 4,4 .b 1a 1a 2 a 3a 4Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionBook embeddingsMinimal book embeddings <strong>of</strong> graphs are good candidates forembeddings with the simplest possible knotting and linkingbehavior.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionBook embeddingsMinimal book embeddings <strong>of</strong> graphs are good candidates forembeddings with the simplest possible knotting and linkingbehavior.Otsuki (1996) defined a canonical book representation <strong>of</strong> acomplete graph K n , and showed that it minimized the number <strong>of</strong>pairs <strong>of</strong> linked 3-cycles and the number <strong>of</strong> knotted 7-cycles.Fleming and M (2009) showed it also minimized the number <strong>of</strong>links <strong>of</strong> a 3-cycle and a 4-cycle.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionBook embeddingsMost recently, Politano* and Rowland (2011) counted andclassified all the knots in the canonical book embeddings <strong>of</strong> K nfor n ≤ 11.graph K 7 K 8 K 9 K 10 K 11# knots 1 29 577 9991 165,102Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionBook embeddingsMost recently, Politano* and Rowland (2011) counted andclassified all the knots in the canonical book embeddings <strong>of</strong> K nfor n ≤ 11.graph K 7 K 8 K 9 K 10 K 11# knots 1 29 577 9991 165,102QuestionDoes the canonical book embedding <strong>of</strong> K n realize the minimalnumber <strong>of</strong> links and/or knots for K n ?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionStraight-edge EmbeddingsIn a straight-edge embedding, every edge is embedded as astraight line.Theorem (Negami, 1991)Given a link L, there is a number R(L) such that whenevern ≥ R(L), every straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K n contains a linkequivalent to L.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionStraight-edge EmbeddingsIn a straight-edge embedding, every edge is embedded as astraight line.Theorem (Negami, 1991)Given a link L, there is a number R(L) such that whenevern ≥ R(L), every straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K n contains a linkequivalent to L.Which links can be realized in straight-edge embeddings <strong>of</strong>particular graphs?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionStraight-edge EmbeddingsIn a straight-edge embedding, every edge is embedded as astraight line.Theorem (Negami, 1991)Given a link L, there is a number R(L) such that whenevern ≥ R(L), every straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K n contains a linkequivalent to L.Which links can be realized in straight-edge embeddings <strong>of</strong>particular graphs?Hughes* (2007) and Huh and Jeon (2008) proved that everystraight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K 6 has one or three pairs <strong>of</strong> linkedtriangles; Ludwig and Arbisi* (2010) investigated links in K 7 .Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionStraight-edge EmbeddingsRamirez Alfonsin (1999) used oriented matroids to prove thatevery straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K 7 contains a trefoil knot.This is an approach which lends itself to computerinvestigation, so it is possible to tackle larger graphs than ispossible with a geometric approach.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionStraight-edge EmbeddingsRamirez Alfonsin (1999) used oriented matroids to prove thatevery straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K 7 contains a trefoil knot.This is an approach which lends itself to computerinvestigation, so it is possible to tackle larger graphs than ispossible with a geometric approach.Recently, Naimi and Pavelescu (2012) have used orientedmatroids to prove that every straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K 9contains a link <strong>of</strong> three components, and that straight-edgeembeddings <strong>of</strong> K 3,3,1 contain 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 non-trivialtwo-component links.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionStraight-edge EmbeddingsRamirez Alfonsin (1999) used oriented matroids to prove thatevery straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K 7 contains a trefoil knot.This is an approach which lends itself to computerinvestigation, so it is possible to tackle larger graphs than ispossible with a geometric approach.Recently, Naimi and Pavelescu (2012) have used orientedmatroids to prove that every straight-edge embedding <strong>of</strong> K 9contains a link <strong>of</strong> three components, and that straight-edgeembeddings <strong>of</strong> K 3,3,1 contain 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 non-trivialtwo-component links.What are the results <strong>of</strong> extending these methods to othergraphs?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionLinking and Knotting in other ManifoldsDefinition (Flapan, Howards, Lawrence, M, 2006)An embedding <strong>of</strong> a graph G in a 3-manifold M is unknotted ifevery cycle in G bounds a disk in M, and it is unlinked if everypair <strong>of</strong> disjoint cycles in G bound disjoint disks in M.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionLinking and Knotting in other ManifoldsDefinition (Flapan, Howards, Lawrence, M, 2006)An embedding <strong>of</strong> a graph G in a 3-manifold M is unknotted ifevery cycle in G bounds a disk in M, and it is unlinked if everypair <strong>of</strong> disjoint cycles in G bound disjoint disks in M.Theorem (Flapan, Howards, Lawrence, M, 2006)For any 3-manifold M, a graph G is intrinsically linked (resp.knotted) in M if and only if it is intrinsically linked (resp. knotted)in S 3 .Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionLinking in RP 3Definition (Foisy et. al.*, 2008)An embedding <strong>of</strong> a graph G in a 3-manifold M is unlinked if forevery pair <strong>of</strong> disjoint cycles L 1 and L 2 , both cycles are unknotsand there is a 3-ball A such that L 1 ⊂ A and L 2 ⊂ A c .In particular, in RP 3 , there are two types <strong>of</strong> unknot: one ishomologically trivial, and the other is not.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionLinking in RP 3Definition (Foisy et. al.*, 2008)An embedding <strong>of</strong> a graph G in a 3-manifold M is unlinked if forevery pair <strong>of</strong> disjoint cycles L 1 and L 2 , both cycles are unknotsand there is a 3-ball A such that L 1 ⊂ A and L 2 ⊂ A c .In particular, in RP 3 , there are two types <strong>of</strong> unknot: one ishomologically trivial, and the other is not.Theorem (Foisy et. al.*, 2008)There are at least 594 minor-minimal intrinsically linked graphsin RP 3 .Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionLinking in RP 3Moreover, some graphs which are intrinsically linked in S 3 arenot intrinsically linked in RP 3 . Here is an unlinked embedding<strong>of</strong> K 6 in RP 3 .What might happen in other manifolds?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionTopological Symmetry GroupsThe topological symmetry group was introduced by Jon Simonin 1986 to study the symmetries <strong>of</strong> molecules whose structureis not rigid. It can be used to study the symmetries <strong>of</strong> any graphembedded in S 3 .DefinitionLet γ be an abstract graph with automorphism group Aut(γ).Let Γ be an embedding <strong>of</strong> γ in S 3 . The (orientation preserving)topological symmetry group <strong>of</strong> Γ, denoted TSG + (Γ), is thesubgroup <strong>of</strong> Aut(γ) induced by orientation preservinghomeomorphisms <strong>of</strong> the pair (S 3 , Γ).Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionTopological Symmetry GroupsThe topological symmetry groups <strong>of</strong> complete graphs havebeen completely classified (Flapan, M, Naimi, 2012). Forexample:Theorem (Flapan, M, Naimi, 2012)A complete graph K m with m ≥ 4 has an embedding Γ in S 3such that TSG + (Γ) = S 4 if and only if m ≡ 0, 4, 8, 12, 20(mod 24).Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionTopological Symmetry GroupsThe topological symmetry groups <strong>of</strong> complete graphs havebeen completely classified (Flapan, M, Naimi, 2012). Forexample:Theorem (Flapan, M, Naimi, 2012)A complete graph K m with m ≥ 4 has an embedding Γ in S 3such that TSG + (Γ) = S 4 if and only if m ≡ 0, 4, 8, 12, 20(mod 24).Some work has been done on topological symmetry groups <strong>of</strong>bipartite complete graphs (M, 2010; Hake*, M, Pittluck*, 2012);but many more groups are possible than with complete graphs,and there is much still to be done. Very little is known aboutother families <strong>of</strong> graphs.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionAn embedding <strong>of</strong> K 20 with TSG + = S 4Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> Conclusion<strong>Intrinsic</strong>ally composite?Given a knot K , let p(K ) be the minimal number <strong>of</strong> factors in adecomposition <strong>of</strong> the knot into a connected sum <strong>of</strong> prime knots.Are their graphs for which every embedding has a knot withlarge p(K )? No!Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> Conclusion<strong>Intrinsic</strong>ally composite?Given a knot K , let p(K ) be the minimal number <strong>of</strong> factors in adecomposition <strong>of</strong> the knot into a connected sum <strong>of</strong> prime knots.Are their graphs for which every embedding has a knot withlarge p(K )? No!Theorem (Flapan, Howards, 2009)Every graph has an embedding in which every knotted cycle isa hyperbolic knot.Since all hyperbolic knots are prime, this means every graphhas an embedding in which all knots are prime knots, withp(K ) = 1.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionColoring knotstricoloringBlake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionColoring knots0431tricoloringmod 5 coloringBlake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionColoring knots0zy431xtricoloringmod 5 coloring2z - x - y = 0 (mod p)Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionColoring graphs(<strong>Graphs</strong> must have all vertices <strong>of</strong> even degree.)023211111Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionColoring graphs(<strong>Graphs</strong> must have all vertices <strong>of</strong> even degree.)0x 1x n2321x 2x 3x n-1111x - x + x - ... - x = 01 2 3 n1Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionColoring graphs(<strong>Graphs</strong> must have all vertices <strong>of</strong> even degree.)0x 1x n2321x 2x 3x n-1111x - x + x - ... - x = 01 2 3 n1Are there graphs which are “intrinsically colorable mod p”?Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionColoring matricesSystem <strong>of</strong> linear equations: variable for each arc; equation foreach crossing and vertex.⎡ ⎤⎡⎤ x−1 2 −1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ⎡ ⎤0 −1 2 −1 0 0 0 0 0x 200 0 −1 0 2 −1 0 0 0x 300 −1 0 2 −1 0 0 0 0x 400 0 0 0 0 −1 2 −1 0x 5=0⎢ 0 0 0 2 0 0 −1 −1 0x 60⎥⎣ 0 0 0 −1 0 0 0 2 −1⎦⎢x 7⎢0⎥⎥ ⎣⎣x ⎦ 0⎦1 0 0 0 −1 0 1 0 −1 80x 9Matrix has c + e columns and c + v rows, where c, e, v are thenumbers <strong>of</strong> crossings, edges, vertices. Colorings are non-trivialsolutions where at least two colors used.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionDeterminant <strong>of</strong> a graphObservation: Any graph with e > v is intrinsically colorablewith at least e − v independent non-trivial colorings.Define the determinant <strong>of</strong> an embedded graph as the greatestcommon divisor <strong>of</strong> the determinants <strong>of</strong> all(c + v − 1) × (c + v − 1) minors.Pre-Theorem: An embedded graph has e − v + 1 independentnon-trivial colorings mod p if and only if p divides thedeterminant.We are currently working to extend this to define an Alexanderpolynomial for graphs. (Joint work with Terry Kong*, AlecLewald*, Vadim Pigrish*.)Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> Conclusion<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong>There are many other questions one could ask about intrinsicproperties <strong>of</strong> spatial graphs. One is asking which propertiesare, in fact, intrinsic: for example, the property <strong>of</strong> containingcomposite knots is not intrinsic.QuestionWhich measures <strong>of</strong> complexity for knots and/or links areintrinsically large? I.e. for any n there is a graph such that everyembedding <strong>of</strong> the graph contains a knot and/or link for whichthe measure is larger than n?For each such intrinsically large property, we can ask the samequestions we have asked about the linking number <strong>of</strong> links,crossing number <strong>of</strong> knots, etc.Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionExtrinsic <strong>Properties</strong>Theta graph 2-bouquet graph handcuff graphRather than looking at intrinsic properties <strong>of</strong> graphs, we couldask how to distinguish embeddings <strong>of</strong> a particular graph.Important examples are the θ graphs, bouquet graphs and thehandcuff graph. Various invariants, such as the Yamadapolynomial, have been developed to distinguish embeddings.Any question asked about knots can also be asked aboutspatial graphs, so the opportunities are endless!Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionReferences(Authors marked with an * worked on the research asundergraduates.)L. Abrams*, B. Mellor, L. Trott*: Counting links and knots incomplete graphs, preprint (2010)P. Blain*, G. Bowlin*, J. Foisy, J. Hendricks*, J. LaCombe*:Knotted Hamiltonian cycles in spatial embeddings <strong>of</strong>complete graphs, New York J. Math. 13 (2007) 11–16J. Bustamante*, J. Federman*, J. Foisy, K. Kozai*, K.Matthews*, K. McNamara*, E. Stark*, K. Trickey*:<strong>Intrinsic</strong>ally linked graphs in projective space, Alg. Geom.Top. 9 (2009) 1255–1274E. Flapan: <strong>Intrinsic</strong> knotting and linking <strong>of</strong> completegraphs, Alg. Geom. Top. 2 (2002) 371–380Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionReferencesE. Flapan, H. Howards, D. Lawrence, B. Mellor: <strong>Intrinsic</strong>linking and knotting <strong>of</strong> graphs in arbitrary 3-manifolds, Alg.Geom. Top. 6 (2006) 1025–1035E. Flapan, H. Howards: Every graph has an embedding inS 3 containing no non-hyperbolic knot, Proc. AMS 137(2009) 4275–4285E. Flapan, B. Mellor, R. Naimi: <strong>Intrinsic</strong> linking and knottingare arbitrarily complex, Fund. Math. 201 (2008) 131–148E. Flapan, B. Mellor, R. Naimi, M. Yoshizawa*:Classification <strong>of</strong> topological symmetry groups <strong>of</strong> K n ,preprint (2012)T. Fleming, B. Mellor: Counting links in complete graphs,Osaka J. Math. 46 (2009) 1–29Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionReferencesK. Hake*, B. Mellor, M. Pittluck*: Topological symmetrygroups <strong>of</strong> complete bipartite graphs, in preparationC. Hughes*: Linked triangle pairs in a straight edgeembedding <strong>of</strong> K 6 , Pi Mu Epsilon J. 12 (2006) 213–218Y. Huh, C.B. Jeon: Knots and links in linear embeddings <strong>of</strong>K 6 , J. Korean Math. Soc. 44 (2007) 661–671L. Ludwig, P. Arbisi*: Linking in straight-edge embeddings<strong>of</strong> K 7 , J. Knot Theory Ramif. 19 (2010) 1431–1447B. Mellor: Complete bipartite graphs whose topologicalsymmetry groups are polyhedral, preprint (2011)Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionReferencesR. Naimi, E. Pavelescu: On the number <strong>of</strong> links in a linearlyembedded K 3,3,1 , preprint (2012)R. Naimi, E. Pavelescu: Linear embeddings <strong>of</strong> K 9 are triplelinked, preprint (2012)S. Negami: Ramsey theorems for knots, links and spatialgraphs, Trans. AMS 324 (1991) 527–541A. Politano*, D. Rowland: Knots in the canonical bookrepresentation <strong>of</strong> complete graphs, preprint (2011)J.L. Ramirez Alfonsin: <strong>Spatial</strong> graphs and orientedmatroids: the trefoil, Disc. Comp. Geom 22 (1999)149–158Blake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>


Introduction Linking and Knotting Other <strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> ConclusionThank YouThank you all for coming to this talk.Thanks to Lew Ludwig and Colin Adams for organizing theconference and giving me the opportunity to speak.Any questions?bmellor@lmu.eduhttp://myweb.lmu.edu/bmellorBlake Mellor<strong>Intrinsic</strong> <strong>Properties</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Graphs</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!