716 C.P. Raptopoulou et al. / Polyhedron 24 (2005) 711–721Fig. 2. Plot of the polymeric cha<strong>in</strong>s of 1 along the ac diagonal. The <strong>in</strong>termolecular <strong>in</strong>teractions between the trimers are shown as dashed l<strong>in</strong>es.strongly <strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>g (most likely through H-bond) to thesecond coord<strong>in</strong>ated methanolic oxygen Om(2) of molecule1a [O(62)Om(2 00 ) = 2.693 Å (2 x, y, 2 z)].Thus, polymeric cha<strong>in</strong>s of alternative dimers of the...a–a–b–b... are formed along the ac diagonal ofthe unit cell. The closest FeFe <strong>in</strong>teratomic distance<strong>in</strong> the a–b part of the cha<strong>in</strong> is Fe(3)Fe(4 00 )= 5.518 Å.3.4. Structural description of [Fe 3 (l 3 -O)(O 2 CPh) 5(salox)(EtOH)(H 2 O)] Æ EtOH (2)The structure of 2 (Figure S1) is analogous to that ofcompound 1, the only difference be<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the monodendateligands complet<strong>in</strong>g the octahedral coord<strong>in</strong>ationaround the <strong>iron</strong>(<strong>III</strong>) ions (one ethanol and one watermolecules <strong>in</strong>stead of two methanols <strong>in</strong> 1). The three Fe <strong>III</strong>ions form a scalene triangle with edges 3.207, 3.277 and3.306 Å. The Fe–O oxo bond distances are <strong>in</strong> the range1.835–1.923 Å and the central [Fe 3 (l 3 -O)] 7+ moiety isplanar. Ions Fe(2) and Fe(3) have an octahedral oxygenrich coord<strong>in</strong>ation env<strong>iron</strong>ment, while Fe(1) has a distortedoctahedral O 5 N coord<strong>in</strong>ation geometry.Despite its similarities <strong>in</strong> the molecular structure withthat of 1, compound 2 presents a different latticestructure orig<strong>in</strong>ated by the existence of <strong>in</strong>termolecular<strong>in</strong>teractions between the isolated trimers. Strong <strong>in</strong>termolecular<strong>in</strong>teractions (possibly through H-bonds) betweenthe oximato oxygen atom O(1) and thecoord<strong>in</strong>ated ethanolic oxygen atom Oe(1) of a centrosymmetricallyrelated trimer [O(1)...Oe(1 0 ) = 2.674 Å( x, y, 1 z)], and between the phenolate oxygenatom O(2) and the coord<strong>in</strong>ated water molecule Ow(1)of a neighbor<strong>in</strong>g trimer [O(2)...Ow(1 00 ) = 2.967 Å(0.5 x, 0.5 + y, 0.5 z)], are responsible for the 2Dpolymeric network (parallel to the [1 0 1] crystallographicplane) <strong>in</strong> 2 (Figure S2). The closest Fe...Fe <strong>in</strong>teratomicdistances due to the H-bond<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>teractions areFe(2)...Fe(2 0 ) = 5.075 Å, and Fe(1)...Fe(3 00 ) = 5.913 Å.Compounds 1 and 2 can be considered as part of thelarge Ôbasic <strong>carboxylate</strong>sÕ family of trivalent oxo-centeredtr<strong>in</strong>uclear compounds with the general formula[M 3 (l 3 -O)(O 2 CR) 6 L 3 ] (L = term<strong>in</strong>al monodentateligand). The only difference between the Ôbasic <strong>carboxylate</strong>sÕand compounds 1 and 2 is that, one of the <strong>carboxylate</strong>sand one of the term<strong>in</strong>al ligands have beenreplaced by the oximato and phenoxy group of the salicylaldoxime,respectively. In that sense, bond distancesand angles <strong>in</strong> the coord<strong>in</strong>ation sphere are <strong>in</strong> the rangesfound for several <strong>iron</strong>(<strong>III</strong>) Ôbasic <strong>carboxylate</strong>sÕ [30–37].3.5. Mössbauer spectraFig. 3 shows Mössbauer spectra from powder samplesof 1 and 2 recorded at room temperature <strong>in</strong> theabsence of an external magnetic field. The spectra forboth compounds consist of two well resolved doublets.Solid l<strong>in</strong>es above the spectra are theoretical simulationsassum<strong>in</strong>g two <strong>iron</strong> sites at 2:1 ratio with theparameters quoted <strong>in</strong> Table 3. For both compoundsthe isomer shifts for sites I and II are typical for highsp<strong>in</strong> Fe <strong>III</strong> <strong>in</strong> an octahedral env<strong>iron</strong>ment compris<strong>in</strong>gO/N atoms.From the crystal structure of complex 1, site I whichrepresents the majority species is readily assigned to the<strong>iron</strong> sites with O 6 env<strong>iron</strong>ment whereas site II, them<strong>in</strong>ority species, is assigned to the <strong>iron</strong> site with O 5 Ncoord<strong>in</strong>ation. Site II is characterized by a significantlylarger DE Q relatively to site I. The DE Q parameter reflectsthe degree of asymmetry around the Fe ion. Thiscan be asymmetry of Fe–L bond lengths and coord<strong>in</strong>ationgeometry, or asymmetry <strong>in</strong> the nature of donoratoms (N or O). In terms of coord<strong>in</strong>ation geometry, significanttrans effects are experienced by Fe(2), Fe(3) <strong>in</strong>
C.P. Raptopoulou et al. / Polyhedron 24 (2005) 711–721 717the spectrum exhibits fairly narrow l<strong>in</strong>es suggest<strong>in</strong>g thatthe <strong>iron</strong> sites <strong>in</strong> molecules 1a and 1b are characterized bysimilar Mössbauer parameters and especially DE Q . Thesituation for complex 2 is similar and the O 5 N coord<strong>in</strong>ated<strong>iron</strong> atom [Fe(1)] with a larger DE Q is assignedto site II, despite its more symmetric octahedral coord<strong>in</strong>ationgeometry.At 4.2 K and <strong>in</strong> the absence of external magnetic fieldsa slight broaden<strong>in</strong>g of the doublets for both complexes isobserved (Fig. S3). No magnetic order<strong>in</strong>g is evidenced at4.2 K. The broaden<strong>in</strong>g can be attributed to the onset ofmagnetic relaxation effects. Alternatively, structuralchanges may occur lead<strong>in</strong>g to three dist<strong>in</strong>ct sites.Although the deconvolution of the spectra is not uniqueboth can be simulated assum<strong>in</strong>g two sites at 2:1 ratio as<strong>in</strong> the room temperature case with the parameters quoted<strong>in</strong> Table 3 (Fig. S3). The average isomer shift for bothcompounds at 4.2 K is 0.54 mm s 1 and the difference<strong>in</strong> the isomer shifts with the room temperature spectrais due to the second order Doppler effect [38].Fig. 3. Room temperature Mössbauer spectra from solid powdersamples of 1 and 2. Solid l<strong>in</strong>es are theoretical spectra assum<strong>in</strong>g twodifferent <strong>iron</strong> sites with the parameters quoted <strong>in</strong> Table 3.Table 3Mössbauer parameters for 1 and 2Complex Site Temperature(K)d a,b,cDE Qa,cC/2 a,d Area (%) d1 I 300 0.42(1) 0.56(1) 0.15 674.2 0.54(1) 0.61(1) 0.19II 300 0.41(1) 1.24(1) 0.15 334.2 0.53(1) 1.15(1) 0.192 I 300 0.42(1) 0.70(1) 0.14 674.2 0.55(1) 0.79(1) 0.19II 300 0.41(1) 1.29(1) 0.14 334.2 0.54(1) 1.31(1) 0.19a In mm s 1 .b Isomer shifts are reported relative to <strong>iron</strong> metal at roomtemperature.c Number <strong>in</strong> parentheses represent errors <strong>in</strong> the last digit.d Fixed.3.6. Magnetic behaviourFor complex 1, the v M T product at 300 K is3.94 cm 3 mol1 K(Fig. 4), significantly lower than thetheoretically expected value for three non-<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>gS = 5/2 sp<strong>in</strong>s (13.14 cm 3 mol1 K), suggest<strong>in</strong>g antiferromagnetic<strong>in</strong>teractions. Upon cool<strong>in</strong>g, the v M T productdecreases to 0.31 cm 3 mol1 K at 2 K, without extrapolat<strong>in</strong>gto zero as the temperatures tends to zero, whichagrees with the <strong>in</strong>terplay of antiferromagnetic <strong>in</strong>teractions,and a magnetic ground state.As analyzed <strong>in</strong> the description of the structures, complex1 actually consists of two <strong>in</strong>dependent molecules(1a and 1b), with two rather different geometries; isosceles(for 1a) and scalene (for 1b, see description of structures).Due to the different geometries it is expected thatmolecule 1a, and by Fe(5), Fe(6) <strong>in</strong> molecule 1b, with theshortest bond be<strong>in</strong>g the Fe–(l 3 -O 2 ) <strong>in</strong> each case. Thecorrespond<strong>in</strong>g trans effect experienced by atoms Fe(1)and Fe(4) is <strong>in</strong>significant (see Table 2). In terms of donoratoms, there are two <strong>iron</strong> atoms with asymmetric O 5 Nchromophores [Fe(1) and Fe(4)] and four atoms withmore symmetric O 6 chromophores [Fe(2), Fe(3), Fe(5)and Fe(6)]. The Mössbauer spectra, therefore, <strong>in</strong>dicatethat the O 5 N coord<strong>in</strong>ation should be considered responsiblefor the larger DE Q value of site II.The resolution of the spectrum of complex 1 does notallow us to dist<strong>in</strong>guish the two crystallographically differentmolecules 1a and 1b. We observe however thatFig. 4. v M T vs. T experimental data for complex 1, and theoreticalcurves based on the Hamiltonian of Eq. (3), us<strong>in</strong>g the parameters ofsolution A.