12.07.2015 Views

Salicylaldoxime (H2salox) in iron(III) carboxylate chemistry ...

Salicylaldoxime (H2salox) in iron(III) carboxylate chemistry ...

Salicylaldoxime (H2salox) in iron(III) carboxylate chemistry ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

C.P. Raptopoulou et al. / Polyhedron 24 (2005) 711–721 717the spectrum exhibits fairly narrow l<strong>in</strong>es suggest<strong>in</strong>g thatthe <strong>iron</strong> sites <strong>in</strong> molecules 1a and 1b are characterized bysimilar Mössbauer parameters and especially DE Q . Thesituation for complex 2 is similar and the O 5 N coord<strong>in</strong>ated<strong>iron</strong> atom [Fe(1)] with a larger DE Q is assignedto site II, despite its more symmetric octahedral coord<strong>in</strong>ationgeometry.At 4.2 K and <strong>in</strong> the absence of external magnetic fieldsa slight broaden<strong>in</strong>g of the doublets for both complexes isobserved (Fig. S3). No magnetic order<strong>in</strong>g is evidenced at4.2 K. The broaden<strong>in</strong>g can be attributed to the onset ofmagnetic relaxation effects. Alternatively, structuralchanges may occur lead<strong>in</strong>g to three dist<strong>in</strong>ct sites.Although the deconvolution of the spectra is not uniqueboth can be simulated assum<strong>in</strong>g two sites at 2:1 ratio as<strong>in</strong> the room temperature case with the parameters quoted<strong>in</strong> Table 3 (Fig. S3). The average isomer shift for bothcompounds at 4.2 K is 0.54 mm s 1 and the difference<strong>in</strong> the isomer shifts with the room temperature spectrais due to the second order Doppler effect [38].Fig. 3. Room temperature Mössbauer spectra from solid powdersamples of 1 and 2. Solid l<strong>in</strong>es are theoretical spectra assum<strong>in</strong>g twodifferent <strong>iron</strong> sites with the parameters quoted <strong>in</strong> Table 3.Table 3Mössbauer parameters for 1 and 2Complex Site Temperature(K)d a,b,cDE Qa,cC/2 a,d Area (%) d1 I 300 0.42(1) 0.56(1) 0.15 674.2 0.54(1) 0.61(1) 0.19II 300 0.41(1) 1.24(1) 0.15 334.2 0.53(1) 1.15(1) 0.192 I 300 0.42(1) 0.70(1) 0.14 674.2 0.55(1) 0.79(1) 0.19II 300 0.41(1) 1.29(1) 0.14 334.2 0.54(1) 1.31(1) 0.19a In mm s 1 .b Isomer shifts are reported relative to <strong>iron</strong> metal at roomtemperature.c Number <strong>in</strong> parentheses represent errors <strong>in</strong> the last digit.d Fixed.3.6. Magnetic behaviourFor complex 1, the v M T product at 300 K is3.94 cm 3 mol1 K(Fig. 4), significantly lower than thetheoretically expected value for three non-<strong>in</strong>teract<strong>in</strong>gS = 5/2 sp<strong>in</strong>s (13.14 cm 3 mol1 K), suggest<strong>in</strong>g antiferromagnetic<strong>in</strong>teractions. Upon cool<strong>in</strong>g, the v M T productdecreases to 0.31 cm 3 mol1 K at 2 K, without extrapolat<strong>in</strong>gto zero as the temperatures tends to zero, whichagrees with the <strong>in</strong>terplay of antiferromagnetic <strong>in</strong>teractions,and a magnetic ground state.As analyzed <strong>in</strong> the description of the structures, complex1 actually consists of two <strong>in</strong>dependent molecules(1a and 1b), with two rather different geometries; isosceles(for 1a) and scalene (for 1b, see description of structures).Due to the different geometries it is expected thatmolecule 1a, and by Fe(5), Fe(6) <strong>in</strong> molecule 1b, with theshortest bond be<strong>in</strong>g the Fe–(l 3 -O 2 ) <strong>in</strong> each case. Thecorrespond<strong>in</strong>g trans effect experienced by atoms Fe(1)and Fe(4) is <strong>in</strong>significant (see Table 2). In terms of donoratoms, there are two <strong>iron</strong> atoms with asymmetric O 5 Nchromophores [Fe(1) and Fe(4)] and four atoms withmore symmetric O 6 chromophores [Fe(2), Fe(3), Fe(5)and Fe(6)]. The Mössbauer spectra, therefore, <strong>in</strong>dicatethat the O 5 N coord<strong>in</strong>ation should be considered responsiblefor the larger DE Q value of site II.The resolution of the spectrum of complex 1 does notallow us to dist<strong>in</strong>guish the two crystallographically differentmolecules 1a and 1b. We observe however thatFig. 4. v M T vs. T experimental data for complex 1, and theoreticalcurves based on the Hamiltonian of Eq. (3), us<strong>in</strong>g the parameters ofsolution A.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!