01.12.2012 Views

BOOK OF ABSTRACTS - EUROSLA

BOOK OF ABSTRACTS - EUROSLA

BOOK OF ABSTRACTS - EUROSLA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4 Papers<br />

A longitudinal study of L2 oral fluency and lexical development in an<br />

instructional setting<br />

Imma Miralpeix and Natalia Fullana<br />

Universitat de Barcelona<br />

For a number of years, researchers have advocated implementing<br />

longitudinal studies as the ultimate way to assess the impact of various<br />

factors on second language (L2) acquisition (Muñoz & Singleton, 2011;<br />

Ortega & Iberri-Shea, 2005; Singleton & Ryan, 2004). While the existing<br />

longitudinal research has mostly focused on age of onset (AO), current work<br />

has evidenced a new (or renewed) interest in the factor of input in L2 speech<br />

acquisition (e.g., Piske & Young-Scholten, 2009). Additionally, the<br />

dimension of oral fluency in an L2 has received considerable attention in<br />

recent longitudinal investigations (e.g., Derwing, Munro, Thomson, &<br />

Rossiter, 2009).<br />

The present study aimed to contribute to the growing body of longitudinal<br />

investigations by looking at the development of L2 oral fluency and<br />

vocabulary in an instructional setting. The sample of the study comprised 15<br />

Catalan/Spanish learners of English, with an AO held constant at 8 years old.<br />

Participants were assessed at four data collection points over a period of 8<br />

years of foreign language instruction. Temporal measures of oral fluency as<br />

well as lexical richness measures were obtained from the learners’ oral<br />

retelling of a picture narrative. Results showed that L2 learners generally<br />

became more fluent over time, as indicated by faster speech rates and shorter<br />

pauses. A higher degree of fluency was also related to greater lexical<br />

richness, similarly to de Jong & Perfetti (2011). Despite this, learners’<br />

degree of oral fluency was lower than that of a control group of English<br />

native speakers. Moreover, learners exhibited different learning trajectories,<br />

corroborating observations from available longitudinal research (e.g.,<br />

Abrahamsson, 2003; Larsen-Freeman, 2006). Findings of this small-scale<br />

longitudinal investigation highlight the need to further typify the quality and<br />

quantity of input in instructional settings where exposure to L2 input is often<br />

limited and nonnative-like (e.g., García-Lecumberri & Gallardo, 2003).<br />

11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!