01.12.2012 Views

Colloquia - British Association for Applied Linguistics

Colloquia - British Association for Applied Linguistics

Colloquia - British Association for Applied Linguistics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

BAAL Conference 2004 37 th Annual BAAL Meeting<br />

integrating a wider range of parameters than concentrating on (national) culture. The examples are<br />

taken from a corpus of data collected during project work in the area of European educational<br />

cooperation. The project participants come from different European countries and use English as a<br />

lingua franca <strong>for</strong> communication. In addition they also represent different professional backgrounds.<br />

The data were collected through participant observation, were tape-recorded and transcribed. The<br />

analysis uses the methods of discourse analysis, ethnography of communication and pragmatics with<br />

a specific focus on the analysis of framing in discourse. This paper analyses how participants frame<br />

their roles in intercultural interaction and how their differing interpretations of what roles are being<br />

inacted lead to miscommunication and negotiation processes. The focus, however, is not on why<br />

miscommunication occurs but on how people deal with problems in communication interactionally and<br />

how they manage to reach common ground.<br />

Talking Posh, Acting Posh? Masculine Identities on an Undergraduate Academic Writing<br />

Programme<br />

Siân Preece<br />

Educational Initiative Centre, University of Westminster<br />

s.preece@wmin.ac.uk<br />

As <strong>British</strong> universities engage with widening participation, the student body is becoming increasingly<br />

diverse. This is particularly the case in post-1992 urbanised universities which recruit large numbers of<br />

„non-traditional‟ students from local areas. A growing proportion of these students are „multilingual‟<br />

(Martin-Jones and Jones, 2000) in the sense that they use English and one or more „community‟<br />

languages. However, on arrival in university, some have low levels of expertise in the ‘literate English’<br />

(Wallace, 2002) and literacy practices of their disciplines and may be referred to academic writing<br />

programmes.<br />

In this paper, I explore ways in which a group of multilingual male participants on an undergraduate<br />

academic writing programme negotiate their „newcomer‟ (Lave and Wenger, 1991) identity in<br />

university. Most are <strong>British</strong>-born and aged 18-21. Through discourse analysis, I reflect on ways in<br />

which the participants per<strong>for</strong>m gender (Butler, 1990), in particular doing „being one of the lads‟. This<br />

involves a strong identification with the language and practices of their peers and a much more<br />

problematic identification with the „discoursing subjects‟ (Foucault, 1991) of higher education, and the<br />

language and literacy practices of university communities of practice. This becomes expressed in<br />

dichotomies such as „talking slang/ talking posh‟, „acting cool/ acting mature‟. I argue that attention to<br />

„face‟ (Goffman, 1972) in the peer group makes it difficult <strong>for</strong> the participants to engage fully in tasks<br />

designed to improve their expertise in „literate English‟ and university literacy practices. Many appear<br />

to be walking a tightrope between conflicting demands. While some learn to negotiate these conflicting<br />

identities, others drop out, are excluded or underachieve. This has implications <strong>for</strong> ways in which<br />

universities approach widening participation and <strong>for</strong> (language) educators working with similar cohorts<br />

of undergraduates.<br />

Collaborating on topic: the work of questions in speaking and literacy lessons<br />

Julie Rad<strong>for</strong>d<br />

School of Psychology & Human Development, Institute of Education, University of London<br />

j.rad<strong>for</strong>d@ioe.ac.uk<br />

Asymmetry in classroom discourse, typified by the teacher's frequent use of inauthentic questions,<br />

potentially constrains the oral contributions of children. The aim of this paper is to compare the<br />

interactions between teachers and pupils during three oral language tasks, where questions per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

different work.<br />

Specialist language teachers were video-taped interacting with children experiencing specific<br />

language difficulties during consecutive episodes of story-writing, speaking-book and circle-time<br />

lessons. By adopting a conversation analytic (CA) approach to the analysis, a detailed account of the<br />

structure and lexical choices within the teachers' initiations is gained. The analysis explores how<br />

these features have different implications <strong>for</strong> topical development in terms of the extent to which they<br />

foster collaboration.<br />

High use of modalisation is found in the speaking book and story-writing activities, indicating the<br />

teachers' willingness to negotiate alternative points of view. During speaking-book the teacher initiates<br />

topic with elicitations, which invite news, ideas or opinions from the child. In story-writing the teacher<br />

uses invitations, that call <strong>for</strong> children to generate ideas or suggestions. Analysis of follow-up turns<br />

demonstrates ways in which the teachers recast and re<strong>for</strong>mulate the prior turn and elicit further topical<br />

material related to the pupils' agendas. By contrast, there is limited use of modalisation or topic<br />

negotiation in the circle-time activity.<br />

King‟s College, London 9 – 11 th - 24 -<br />

September, 2004

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!