12.07.2015 Views

AUSCHWITZ: PLAIN FACTS - Holocaust Handbooks

AUSCHWITZ: PLAIN FACTS - Holocaust Handbooks

AUSCHWITZ: PLAIN FACTS - Holocaust Handbooks

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

158 Germar Rudolf (ed.), Auschwitz: Plain FactsBirkenau was 12 g/m 3 . 99 We shall later learn Pressac’s reason for this increase.– “Drahtnetzeinschiebvorrichtung” – wire mesh push-in device – does notmean “introduction devices made of wire netting” (dispositifsd’introduction en treillis de fil de fer, p. 79). The German verb “einschieben”means to insert, to slide into, to push in, for example, to insertor push a drawer into a cabinet.The alleged device for the introduction of Zyklon B in the alleged homicidalgas chambers would be called “Einwurfvorrichtung” (throw in device).Pressac himself speaks in fact of déversement, “pouring out,” ofthe Zyklon B in the alleged homicidal gas chambers (p. 89). The woodenblinds (Holzblenden, p. 79) cannot be what Pressac maintains either, i.e.wooden covers or lids of the alleged introduction devices for the ZyklonB. These devices would be called “Holzdeckel,” precisely covers, notblinds.Pressac states that the above-mentioned devices were found in “morgue1” (p. 79), that is, the alleged homicidal gas chamber. But in reality, inthe inventory of Crematory II, 100 these devices are attributed to morgue 2,the alleged changing room (for the supposed homicidal gas chamber).Did the SS want to gas the victims in the “changing room”? But that’snot all! These devices do not figure at all in the inventory of CrematoryIII. 101 Then how did the SS think they could introduce the Zyklon B intothe gas chamber? By affably asking the victims to carry in the cans ofZyklon B and open them after the gas-proof door closed behind them?Therefore, these devices could have been anything but what Jean-ClaudePressac claims.– The designation “undressing cellar” (p. 74) attributed to morgue 2 is perfectlynormal, if we assume that a temporary disinfestation gas chamberwas installed in morgue 1. 1026.7. The “Normal Gas Chamber”Jährling’s “glitch” shows once again, as if there were any more need for it,with what kind of distorted logic Pressac has fabricated his “criminal traces.”The paragrpah merits citation in its entirety. But first, it is necessary to give abrief historical introduction.Nineteen Zyklon B gas disinfestation chambers with the circulation systemwere planned for the new reception building of the main camp, where newly99 J.-C. Pressac, “Les Carences et Incoherences du ‘Rapport Leuchter,’” Jour J, 1988, p. III.100 Übergabeverhandlung of Crematory II, March 31, 1943. APMO, BW 30/43, p. 12.101 Übergabeverhandlung of Crematory III, June 24, 1943. APMO, BW 30/43, p. 24.102 See C. Mattogno, “The Morgues of the Crematoria…,” part II, op. cit. (note 86).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!